AZ GOP: make church attendance mandatory

WeedFreak78

WeedFreak78

Well-Known Member
I don't get how christian fundamentalists don't realize the rules they want to implement on others are no different than what extreme Islamists want.. rule based on religion, but because htey don't call for the death of infidels it's justified??? F-tards.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
WeedFreak78 said:
I don't get how christian fundamentalists don't realize the rules they want to implement on others are no different than what extreme Islamists want.. rule based on religion, but because htey don't call for the death of infidels it's justified??? F-tards.
Click to expand...
Don't stop there, add the politically correct crybabies who want laws based on feelings getting hurt.

Moral majority and political correctness both rely on the thought that everyone must act and think in approved ways and legislation needs to be passed to ensure it happens.

Collectivism is the nut low.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Forcing other people to do things they prefer not to seems to be the root cause of many problems.

Government puts legs to this means and many people think the end results can be separated from the means, those people are wrong.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
WeedFreak78 said:
I don't get how christian fundamentalists don't realize the rules they want to implement on others are no different than what extreme Islamists want.. rule based on religion, but because htey don't call for the death of infidels it's justified??? F-tards.
Click to expand...
they do call for the deaths of 'infidels' though.

people like scott lively, who helped uganda write their "kill the gays" bill (funded in part by chic fil A), or people who murder doctors or blow up gay night clubs.

hell, the KKK has amassed nearly 5000 lynchings and the body count amassed by right wing religious extremists in america since 9/11 far exceeds that of jihadists.

there was manifest destiny, and now we are finding out that the eugenics programs in the south were not just limited to a couple states, virginia has apparently come forward now too and others will too, undoubtedly.

yet folks like ginwilly and desert dude will root these people on every step of the way in their quest for christian sharia law in america, while going completely off the wall about the "threat" posed by the 0.8% of americans who are muslim rather than the 70%+ of americans who are christians.

let's not forget the cruel effects that this christian sharia law has on women in this nation, too.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
Don't stop there, add the politically correct crybabies who want laws based on feelings getting hurt.

Moral majority and political correctness both rely on the thought that everyone must act and think in approved ways and legislation needs to be passed to ensure it happens.

Collectivism is the nut low.
Click to expand...
lol, a white supremacist crying about political correctness.

as if the unacceptability of certain words is anywhere near on par with the complete platform of intolerance that you cheer and root for, things like allowing store owners to refuse service to gays, or letting EMTs refuse life saving treatment to gays, both policies which you have stated support for.

you end it all by bemoaning "collectivism", as if the nanny state collectivism that your hero rawn pawl espuses somehow magically doesn't qualify.

go ahead and complain about the moral majority while supporting a candidate who wants to outlaw gay marriage and abortion, ya two face hypocrite POS loser.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top