I don't know why so many cannabis proponents seize on studies that are promising without reading the entire journal entries or understanding the limitations. (Love having JSTOR and a bunch of other journal access portals!)
Cannabis is great medicine, no doubt. It's safe, being practically nontoxic, and can alleviate pain, muscle spasticity, seizures, nausea and nerve pain because of our natural endocannabinoid receptors.
The cancer claims are interesting and I find the apoptosis of cancerous cells in the presence of THC to be worth further investigation. But does it stack up to modern treatment? Not at this point. Would it be ethical to run studies providing people with cancer only cannabis derived medication in lieu of proper treatment? No, not based on the current effectiveness of what we have.
Hey brobeans, ever study telomeres? Always found the idea of stopping cancerous division by way of telomeres interesting. So if the damaged cells don't have proper telomere length of marked locations, a cell would no longer divide. I'm a soft sciences guy but have always had a love for the hard sciences. What's your dissertation on? I'm trying to finish up my thesis but I've been loathing my topic as of late.