Blacks Patrolling neighborhoods with guns

In order to "Give back" the land, the government will have to first give permission. Just like you had to ask them for permission to start your laundromat and buy your first home.
Nope just let Rob Roy call the news media and make an announcement of his plans and the reason why. He would make history.
images.jpg images.jpg index.jpg
 
I like how you searched the net far and wide to come up with images that declare this my zone, that was nice of you to go to all that work just for me. Just don't let your man crush turn into Stalking, and by stalking I mean being behind me and going the same way.
No worries on the stalking...not really worth my time
 
How did this become about me ? You are the one saying you hate the way the government forces people. I say to you be a MAN of your word and believes. If you think this government is about force, you can make a start and give back the land that was taken from a certain group of people. Lead by example. Show us that you truly believe that force is wrong. Give back your land. You sir will make history


If you AREN'T the one saying the government forces people, how come you can't come up with ONE thing they do that doesn't rely on force?

Answer the question or admit your were in error....be a man. Lol.
 
It seems like we might agree on something, that taking things that aren't ours or given to us on a consenting basis is wrong.

Would you agree with that statement?
So you never answered my question.
If I dam up the stream that provides your water on my property.
Have I aggressed against you?
 
So you never answered my question.
If I dam up the stream that provides your water on my property.
Have I aggressed against you?

It depends. Who owns what must first be established to determine if somebody needs restituting.

I was hoping you would get there from my previous post.
 
It depends. Who owns what must first be established to determine if somebody needs restituting.

I was hoping you would get there from my previous post.
Never hope that cheesy will be able to make a logical connection, it aint gonna happen.
 
It depends. Who owns what must first be established to determine if somebody needs restituting.

I was hoping you would get there from my previous post.
No your previous post is like this one.
You dancing around.
my property
a stream you are down stream of
I dam it
you have no water
 
Last edited:
No your previous post is like this one.
You dancing around.

No, you are failing to comprehend.

If I own the right to that water you are aggressing. If I don't own the right to that water and you do, you are not aggressing.

That is all....grasshopper.
 
No, you are failing to comprehend.

If I own the right to that water you are aggressing. If I don't own the right to that water and you do, you are not aggressing.

That is all....grasshopper.
You only own the right to the water on your property
dance
dance
dance
 
No, you are failing to comprehend.

If I own the right to that water you are aggressing. If I don't own the right to that water and you do, you are not aggressing.

That is all....grasshopper.
So now your property is worthless
your crops are dead
and your family is starving
 
So now your property is worthless
your crops are dead
and your family is starving

Sounds like the government just stepped in.


Okay, my property is worthless or stolen? Which pieces of my property or rights were violated by the dam builder is the first thing that must be established, if any were violated at all.
 
Sounds like the government just stepped in.


Okay, my property is worthless or stolen? Which pieces of my property or rights were violated by the dam builder is the first thing that must be established, if any were violated at all.
Not stolen at all. It's still your property. It's just worthless now. Just like your non aggression principal
 
Back
Top