Dr.Pecker
Well-Known Member
What did I say can't be fake?
ALIEN TECH
- Thread starter Dr.Pecker
- Start date
Doer
Well-Known Member
Oh, don't worry, I will be commenting in this thread, for years to come, so you may as well get used to it.
Doer
Well-Known Member
That is certainly a helicopter.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Now these are the most fascinating ones to me. There are some very un-explainable light streaks occuring in otherwise very innocuous video. Or are they un-explained? These are called the Rods. And they are quite fake.
That is some girl's tooth being ejected in a Cheer leading accident.
http://www.amsky.com/ufos/rods/
This One's Not a Bug
In this frame, from a scene on The Worlds Most Amazing Videos, we see the aftermath of an accident at a cheerleading competition. During a throwing maneuver one girl's elbow hit another in the mouth. This "rod" is a tooth belonging to the girl on the receiving end of the elbow (she finished the competition, her team placed third and she has fully recovered).
This photograph plainly shows that, contrary to Jose Escamilla's assertion, fast-moving objects do elongate on video frames.
--------------------------------
This all started with bugs flying across a cave entrance. It is an artifact of focal distance and lens effects.
As the author states:
Another factor plainly visible in the videos is, if you take the images of a rod from frame to frame and superimpose them on a single frame, the images from successive frames appear to line up end-to-end except for a short gap attributable to vertical blanking and scan delay. The only exception is that images of very-slow-moving "rods" overlap due to blur. This is also consistent with lengthening due to movement across the field during the exposure of the photograph.
I will answer your personal attacks with the following two challenges:
I challenge anyone to demonstrate that the majority of the legitimate scientific community* believes that "rods" are anything other than photographic artifacts.
I also challenge anyone to prove that "rods" are not artifacts of the photographic process (this proof must be capable of withstanding peer review in the legitimate scientific community).
Dr.Pecker
Well-Known Member
I know what rods are. A bug a bird flying by the camera, but in that video it flies faster than bugs or birds. Rods were my first thought, watch it again. It goes behind the arch you should be a better judge of speed and distance than what you suggesting. It may have the rod effect to a degree but it changes direction look closer at the video.Now these are the most fascinating ones to me. There are some very un-explainable light streaks occuring in otherwise very innocuous video. Or are they un-explained? These are called the Rods. And they are quite fake.
That is some girl's tooth being ejected in a Cheer leading accident.
http://www.amsky.com/ufos/rods/
This One's Not a Bug
In this frame, from a scene on The Worlds Most Amazing Videos, we see the aftermath of an accident at a cheerleading competition. During a throwing maneuver one girl's elbow hit another in the mouth. This "rod" is a tooth belonging to the girl on the receiving end of the elbow (she finished the competition, her team placed third and she has fully recovered).
This photograph plainly shows that, contrary to Jose Escamilla's assertion, fast-moving objects do elongate on video frames.
--------------------------------
This all started with bugs flying across a cave entrance. It is an artifact of focal distance and lens effects.
As the author states:
Another factor plainly visible in the videos is, if you take the images of a rod from frame to frame and superimpose them on a single frame, the images from successive frames appear to line up end-to-end except for a short gap attributable to vertical blanking and scan delay. The only exception is that images of very-slow-moving "rods" overlap due to blur. This is also consistent with lengthening due to movement across the field during the exposure of the photograph.
I will answer your personal attacks with the following two challenges:
I challenge anyone to demonstrate that the majority of the legitimate scientific community* believes that "rods" are anything other than photographic artifacts.
I also challenge anyone to prove that "rods" are not artifacts of the photographic process (this proof must be capable of withstanding peer review in the legitimate scientific community).
Dr.Pecker
Well-Known Member
You cant have the yin without the yang.Oh, don't worry, I will be commenting in this thread, for years to come, so you may as well get used to it.
Dr.Pecker
Well-Known Member
Is that guy saying hay look at the helicopter?
Doer
Well-Known Member
Well, our humble readers, my not know about Rods. I'll look again as you so friendly suggest.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Well, if it was Bulgarian it would be,
Kheĭ , vizh , che khelikopter!!!
Doer
Well-Known Member
Well, it would be hard to describe a rod effect that first passed in front of and then behind the Arch. So, no doubt, a lens/focal length artifact can be ruled out. It cannot a close, fast flying white moth or something.
And the size of it is as large as a bird, but at that distance it is flying a lot faster than a bird. Since we know the UFO and the Bridge are in the same focal plane, we can calculate the speed if we know the size of the bridge.
If we can rule out any doctoring...not so sure about that, then this is a very interesting not-rod.
And the size of it is as large as a bird, but at that distance it is flying a lot faster than a bird. Since we know the UFO and the Bridge are in the same focal plane, we can calculate the speed if we know the size of the bridge.
If we can rule out any doctoring...not so sure about that, then this is a very interesting not-rod.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Streak against clouds - Photoshop
Blurred and grainy UFO - Photoshop
When will they tell us???? I say, when will all these fakers, SDSTFU?
I used to totally believe in Crop Circles, and creepy things. But, now I know there are Monsters.
Youtube is a modern day Monster.
Doer
Well-Known Member
As you see, I am pretty well versed in all this, and I don't dis-believe it. I simply don't believe most of the examples. Most of it is intentional bunk. Why? P.T Barnum said, "there is a sucker born every minute." And that is why.
However, there is certainly room in Quantum Science for ANYTHING. When anything can happen, regardless of the "rules" of nature, that is a big field of probability.
However, there is certainly room in Quantum Science for ANYTHING. When anything can happen, regardless of the "rules" of nature, that is a big field of probability.
Dr.Pecker
Well-Known Member
I have to admit I was drinking a little bit when I posted those last few. Usually I look for the pixel outline around the object, and find that most of the shiny metallic ufos are fake. I'm also skeptical of any video pointed out a window when driving or flying that shows a ufo and nobody is freaking out. I see no reason to even be filming in some situations. I do know what it's like to see something amazing and let me tell you I was freaking out to the point of physically shaking.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Well the interesting thing about the metallic blimp video is the edit, or so called cut. Always look for the cut away.
The object is not superimposed, so it has no edit line. It is a still shot of a prop, highly lighted
that has been blurred. And it has the usual, corny, conspiracy tag line.
But, still there is some weird stuff.
Unusual lights have been reported here since 1940s or earlier. Especially high activity of Hessdalen lights took place from December 1981 until the summer of 1984 when lights were observed 15–20 times per week. The frequency of the lights caused a gathering of numerous tourists staying there overnight to see the phenomenon.[1] Since then, the activity has decreased and now the lights are observed some 10–20 times per year. The Hessdalen light most often is a bright, white or yellow light of unknown origin standing or floating above the ground level. Sometimes the light can be seen for more than one hour. There are several other types of unexplained lights observed in the Hessdalen valley.
(notice how the stars are not blurred)
This one is very hard to fathom. Way before photoshop, this was a known oddity.
(The guy on the right has a modern camera. !!!)
People believe that this photograph, taken in 1941 at the re-opening of the South Forks Bridge in Gold Bridge, Canada, is depicting a man in seemingly modern dress and style, with a camera that is advanced well beyond its time. The circle on the left illustrates a man with a camera typical to the time-period
Black Knight Satellite mystery
Legend has it that in orbit around the Earth is a mysterious, dark object which dates back perhaps 13 000 years. Its origin and purpose are inscrutable, dubbed the “Black Knight” this elusive satellite has allegedly been beaming signals towards the Earth and inspected by NASA astronauts yet only a few on Earth officially know of its existence. The origin of the ominous name is part of the enigma; it is impossible to discover who first called it this or indeed why. Humans have only in the last 60 years had the technology to launch a man-made object into space so what is the logical explanation of tales of an alien intruder on our doorstep?
The Madonna with Saint Giovannino and a UFO
This painting is called “The Madonna with Saint Giovannino”. It was painted in the 15th century by Domenico Ghirlandaio (1449-1494) and hangs as part of the Loeser collection in the Palazzo Vecchio. Above Mary’s right shoulder is a disk shaped object. Below is a blow up of this section and a man and his dog can clearly be seen looking up at the object.
Falcon Lake Incident
The Falcon Lake Incident is a reported unidentified flying object (UFO) encounter near Falcon Lake, Manitoba, Canada claimed to have occurred on May 20, 1967 by Stefan Michalak. He had had taken a short vacation in Whiteshell Provincial Park to prospect veins of quartz near Falcon Lake when he spotted two cigar-shaped objects descending, one of which landed near him. Michelak says he saw a door open and heard voices from inside the object, after which he tried to make contact in English and other languages but got no response. He claims to have burned his hand while attempting to examine “colourful glass” found around the object and seen a grid-like exhaust vent that expelled gas that burned his clothing.
Last edited:
Doer
Well-Known Member
Yeah, I have Gimp.... free photoshop like. Have you ever used a photo editor? I think we also need to understand another point. Sure there is a sucker born every minute. But, there is a P.T. Barnum born every minute just to take advantage.
I almost got scammed the other day, and come to think of it maybe she was a space alien.