rand paul gets an ally!

ElfoodStampo

Well-Known Member
affirmative action was used to even the playing field after 300 years of bullshit you snitch
Why does the playing field need evening? Are you implying that without a law dictating, black are not equal to whites or anyone else? You don't need laws, were all equal.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
By the mere fact he defends someone who wants to deny service base on race is sick. Bottom line !!!!!!
Do you defend the KKK's right to exist? New Black Panthers? Westboro Church? NAACP? Is this the same as defending their position? Would you think someone an idiot who claimed that were a supporter of KKK because they disagree with you that shouldn't be allowed to exist?

Most people understand that RR's position has nothing to do with race yet yours has everything to do with race. You call him racist....
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I'm not a white supremacy dick wadd.
then why do you call the president by racial slurs and want to make it legal to deny service to black people on the basis that they are black?

sounds kinda like something white supremacist would do.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
RR has never ever even once said he wouldn't serve blacks.
either rob roy would serve blacks or he is being "coerced" into serving blacks, an being "forced" into doing something he "wouldn't ordinarily" do.

you and rob roy and desert dude (who joined a white supremacy group) spend so much time aligning yourselves with people like david duke (former grandwizard of the KKK) in your opposition to civil rights, but then you turn around and try to tell us racism is dead and of course you would serve black people.

it makes no sense and we see right through it for the white supremacy it is.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I think you are confused. I support people being free to chose their associations, all people of every persuasion, you do not.

My opinion is that it is wrong to make people associate that do not want to and it is also wrong to prevent people from associating if both parties want to.

You think making people associate is acceptable even if one or both don't want to. How is that NOT a form of enslaving somebody?

Your friend Uncle Buck tries very hard to put lipstick on his coercive methods by pointing to the outcome and ignoring the method will you do the same and ignore the points I make above? I think you will.
and there it is again.

rob roy feels that he is enslaved, coerced, and made to serve blacks.

hence why no one believes him when he says he would serve blacks, save the few people that ally with him in opposition to civil rights.

that puts robroy, desert dude, ginwilly, and many other on this forum in ideological unity with the KKK, neo-nazis, david duke, and other white supremacists.

but of course, racism is dead.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
What does the term "owner" mean to you?
do you truly own the restaurant if the government says you may not defecate into the potato salad?

do you truly own the gas station if the government says your pumps must be monitored to ensure they actually dispense the correct amount of gas that the customer paid for?

do you truly own the hotel if the government says you can not go tell those darkies to pound sand?

you are such a persecuted slave, robby.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Do you defend the KKK's right to exist? New Black Panthers? Westboro Church? NAACP? Is this the same as defending their position? Would you think someone an idiot who claimed that were a supporter of KKK because they disagree with you that shouldn't be allowed to exist?

Most people understand that RR's position has nothing to do with race yet yours has everything to do with race. You call him racist....
wow, ginwilly just compared the NAACP to the KKK and WBC.

but folks, he is totally not racist. he just happens to share an opposition to civil rights with rend pawl, david duke, and resident white supremacist desert dude.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
One thing about this site, It lets me know we still have some real fucked up people in this world.
tell me about it.

there are some real sick fucks that actually want to take steps towards racial parity with programs like affirmative action (RACIST!) while denying white racists the FREEDOM to deny service to blacks, gays, hispanics, and whoever else we deem unworthy (TOTALLY NOT RACIST!).

i mean, what kind of person wants to live in a world where store owners are not allowed to kick you out because of your skin color, and minorities get a fair shake at upward mobility?
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Do you defend the KKK's right to exist? New Black Panthers? Westboro Church? NAACP? Is this the same as defending their position? Would you think someone an idiot who claimed that were a supporter of KKK because they disagree with you that shouldn't be allowed to exist?

Most people understand that RR's position has nothing to do with race yet yours has everything to do with race. You call him racist....
The KKK wants to see discrimination and spreads hatred. The NAACP does the opposite. Hell even you can join the NAACP. I can't ( and wouldn't ) join the KKK. I hope you were not serious trying to compare the two.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
tell me about it.

there are some real sick fucks that actually want to take steps towards racial parity with programs like affirmative action (RACIST!) while denying white racists the FREEDOM to deny service to blacks, gays, hispanics, and whoever else we deem unworthy (TOTALLY NOT RACIST!).

i mean, what kind of person wants to live in a world where store owners are not allowed to kick you out because of your skin color, and minorities get a fair shake at upward mobility?
absolutely mind-boggling,but very telling
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Amen. Let's be racist to end racism!
a law that works towards racial parity without mandating it is not racist. that is what affirmative action does.

what you advocate is racism for the sake of racism. denying service based on skin color takes freedom away from people, it does not give anyone more freedom.

yet for some reason, you are a leading advocate of denying service to people on the basis of their skin color.

what a piece of shit you are. why do you want to see a return to denial of service based on skin color?
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
a law that works towards racial parity without mandating it is not racist. that is what affirmative action does.

what you advocate is racism for the sake of racism. denying service based on skin color takes freedom away from people, it does not give anyone more freedom.

yet for some reason, you are a leading advocate of denying service to people on the basis of their skin color.

what a piece of shit you are. why do you want to see a return to denial of service based on skin color?
Like Martin Luther King, I dream of the day that "“my three children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”

Me and Martin are that sort of shit.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Like Martin Luther King, I dream of the day that "“my three children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”

Me and Martin are that sort of shit.
you are nothing like King. You would tell King that he could not eat at a restaurant due to the color of his skin.
 
Top