i've called out more than three lies from you today, why should i be interested in your errors?
by the way, it's a scientific poll which measures opinion.
just thought you needed further correction and thought that might stick, but you are pretty fucking hopeless.
so what you are saying is, you cant find the glaring error i made in a previous citation, which you COULD have spotted readily if you had checked my sources, but you were to busy declaring my sources to be "right wing think tanks" to bother actually examining the material presented...
you could have just said you were too intellectually lazy to bother with reading citations, and i could have simply not provided them. naturally i would have provided them anyhow, cuz i like to be certain of my facts when i make an assertion
now, as to your claims of "calling me out on more than three lies" well thats a matter of OPINION.
your opinion is, anything i say is a lie if it disagrees with your established doctrines
MY opinion is, facts are facts, and your refusal to believe in them doesnt change their value or accuracy.
since i have backed up my assertions with a delightful melange' of factual assertions, scholarly citations, some pretty cool math, and some excruciatingly painful (for you) graphical representations of that data, i can see why your butthurt is so intense, and i understand why you wish to retreat to the safe and warm hugbox of opinion polls.
however, as deeply ensconced in that hugbox as you are, the facts still remain as trenchant as ever, and when you finally emerge from your echochamber chrysalis to infest another thread with the exact same assertions that have failed in this one, you will still be (at least) as wrong (who knows you may find a new way to be wrong tonight, your odds are good) as you are right now.
retreating from discussion when you are in error doesnt help a bit if the next time you surge forward, you maintain the same level of wrongness you display today.
so, in brief:
termites DO produce more co2 than humans (by a substantial margin)
heat DOES play more of a role in Co2 concentrations than human emissions (by a similarly large margin)
water vaour IS at least 500x more powerful in the greenhouse system than Co2
lefties STILL cant seem to do math
Ad Hominem attacks against a scientist's credibility without actually refuting his assertions STILL mean less than nothing
the three factual errors i made in this thread were found by ME, and two were corrected while the third (which is non-substantive) remains outstanding as a challenge to your professed expertise
you STILL cant argue a position without making baseless personal attacks against the opponent
AGW is STILL an unproven theory (and it's getting shakier every day)
and finally...
clowns fucking is STILL funny.