Teacher fired for breaking up fight.

[ginwilly]

It is possible to delete posts and it would be difficult to find such a post so your little challenge is pointless. I remember having this discussion with you, this is not the first time that you have changed your stance while swearing you never thought differently. You liked kynes post where he described welfare programs as essential during austerity after stating clearly your opposition to them.

The challenge is pointless and your credibility is gone.

You really aren't that bright are you.

Welfare is essential but we are doing it wrong. How is that different than anything you've heard out of me.

Yes, I want the racist exposed, you want him hidden and protected. Not sure why that's racist in your mind, but there's lots of things about your thought process that makes no sense

No way I'm going back and deleting old posts, that would be easy enough to find out if I did. Take the challenge you puss.. I remember awhile back when my firefox and RIU were arguing and some strange things were happening. It showed me liking the same post three times and I had a double post show up minutes later. buck kept repeating that it wasn't a double post and it said something completely different until a mod got involved, he shut up about it after that. That's the only time I've deleted a post here, easy enough to find out.

Take the challenge.

 

[abandonconflict]

At any rate I applaud you for changing your views. That shit you used to argue, like Africans having evolved differently from the neck up, was really bigoted, just like your old views on the civil rights act. Glad you changed your mind.

 

[ginwilly]

At any rate I applaud you for changing your views. That shit you used to argue, like Africans having evolved differently from the neck up, was really bigoted, just like your old views on the civil rights act. Glad you changed your mind.

Show where my views have changed on civil rights or gtfo with your lies. Show where I mentioned blacks about evolution or gtfo. I explicitly said region, and explicitly stated that there are physical characteristics on continents within the same skin color so assuming there couldn't possibly be cognitive differences was ignorant and PC driven. I did also state that I had no idea who was more advanced or not and Nordics and Mediterraneans most likely had differing developments. Stop being a bucktard.

 

[UncleBuck]

If you can show a post of mine saying I'm against civil rights bring it out and I'll leave for a month?

"WHY DO WE NEED CIVIL RIGHT!?!" - ginwilly

"what about the racist food spitters?" - ginwilly

 

[ginwilly]

"WHY DO WE NEED CIVIL RIGHT!?!" - ginwilly

"what about the racist food spitters?" - ginwilly

wow, I can do that too

"blacks need help that other races don't" - UncleBuck
" I lie when I have no way to debate my idiotic points" - UncleBuck

 

[UncleBuck]

Show where I mentioned blacks about evolution or gtfo

https://www.rollitup.org/t/white-people-are-so-stupid.739104/page-6#post-9717830

It's odd, stating that one geographic location produces taller people, or longevity differences from differing regions, but unless you believe evolution is only from the neck down you must be racist. Pointing out that Asian kids score higher that white kids in both Asian countries and America is not racist, but pointing out anyone scoring LESS is? PC people are the nut low.

General differences in height, build, life expectancy, skin color, hair color, eye color, bone structure, digestion, etc.. but not intelligence? Seems impossible to NOT have differences when compared to other genetics.

it's obvious to most that there are genetic differences among geographical locations brought about by evolution. I don't understand why evolution can only be possible from the neck down is all.

"geographical locations"

 

[UncleBuck]

"blacks need help that other races don't" - UncleBuck

i never said that. you did ask repeatedly why we need civil rights, and said that civil rights was a bad idea because of racist food spitters.

want me to get the quotes, unlike you?

 

[ginwilly]

i never said that. you did ask repeatedly why we need civil rights, and said that civil rights was a bad idea because of racist food spitters.

want me to get the quotes, unlike you?

Yes I actually do. I've been asking for them every since you welched on the bet that you had them. Your obsession with me is obvious so I know you have my posts in a file. Bring them out.
Is this where you quote me asking you why YOU think we need title II and claim that it means I'm against civil rights? Didn't work then, won't work now.

 

[UncleBuck]

Yes I actually do. I've been asking for them every since you welched on the bet that you had them. Your obsession with me is obvious so I know you have my posts in a file. Bring them out.
Is this where you quote me asking you why YOU think we need title II and claim that it means I'm against civil rights? Didn't work then, won't work now.

WHY DO WE NEED SEATBELT LAWS!?!

also, i am in favor of seatbelt laws.

totally legit, right?

you are deluding no one.

anyhoo, since it is not in dispute that you asked repeatedly about WHY DO WE NEED CIVIL RIGHTS?!?, i'll post here where you argued against civil rights because racist food spitters.

Would you rather force him to feed people he hates while spitting or doing who knows what to their food out of resentment all while the targets are unaware of the owners feelings?

clearly your stance is that blacks should not be allowed in certain stores because of racist food spitters. there's no way to spin that remark. clearly you think blacks are incapable of handling freedom or discerning between friendly businesses and those with racist food spitters.

by the way, bignbushy and donalejandro, two prominent racists, share your exact same sentiment on this one.

it's the company you keep, limp dick.

 

[abandonconflict]

Lulz

Pivot much ginwilly?

 

[abandonconflict]

I agree with the sentiment, but my point is, it's obvious to most that there are genetic differences among geographical locations brought about by evolution. I don't understand why evolution can only be possible from the neck down is all.

 

[ginwilly]

WHY DO WE NEED SEATBELT LAWS!?!

also, i am in favor of seatbelt laws.

totally legit, right?

you are deluding no one.

anyhoo, since it is not in dispute that you asked repeatedly about WHY DO WE NEED CIVIL RIGHTS?!?, i'll post here where you argued against civil rights because racist food spitters.



clearly your stance is that blacks should not be allowed in certain stores because of racist food spitters. there's no way to spin that remark. clearly you think blacks are incapable of handling freedom or discerning between friendly businesses and those with racist food spitters.

by the way, bignbushy and donalejandro, two prominent racists, share your exact same sentiment on this one.

it's the company you keep, limp dick.

It's you who assumed the black/white angle, like you always do. If a local Mexican or Chinese restaurant didn't want to serve Sicilians but were forced to anyway. I'd rather not give those people my money. What is racist about not wanting to associate with racists? I want to expose racists, you want to hide and protect them. Logic would dictate you are the racist one here. Why do you want to protect racists?

Lulz

Pivot much ginwilly?

LOL, again, you must be going off of UB's interpretation and not what I said.

I'll ask again, prove it or leave.

 

[abandonconflict]

It's you who assumed the black/white

I don't have to assume anything. It doesn't matter to which ethnicity you may or may not have alluded. It is indictment enough upon your views that you think any race may have evolved with differing cognitive capacity.

 

[ginwilly]

I don't have to assume anything. It doesn't matter to which ethnicity you may or may not have alluded. It is indictment enough upon your views that you think any race may have evolved with differing cognitive capacity.

FFS dude, NOT RACE. I never mentioned race. The fact you keep harping on that is telling.

Do you believe that different physical traits were developed by region based on survival? Do you believe that different cognitive traits were developed by region based on survival?

Anyone want to bet me AC doesn't answer these two questions?

 

[sheskunk]

It is possible to delete posts and it would be difficult to find such a post so your little challenge is pointless. I remember having this discussion with you, this is not the first time that you have changed your stance while swearing you never thought differently. You liked kynes post where he described welfare programs as essential during austerity after stating clearly your opposition to them.

The challenge is pointless and your credibility is gone.

Just like the private messages you sent me asking for more pictures of myself?

 

[ginwilly]

WHY DO WE NEED SEATBELT LAWS!?!.

We don't, people will wear them for safety or not and pay the price. This is an insurance law as well as mandated insurance for all drivers.

also, i am in favor of seatbelt laws..

Of course you are, you love forcing your views on others "for their own good"

totally legit, right?

no, not at all. It started with "we won't pull you over for it, just ticket you if you get pulled for something else you'll pay a small fine" to " we'll pull you over and collect our tax"

you are deluding no one..

Thanks I guess, I wasn't trying to delude to you.....

 

[abandonconflict]

FFS dude, NOT RACE. I never mentioned race. The fact you keep harping on that is telling.

Do you believe that different physical traits were developed by region based on survival? Do you believe that different cognitive traits were developed by region based on survival?

Anyone want to bet me AC doesn't answer these two questions?

Yes, race. It is the only thing that can be gleaned from your speculation. That the indigenous inhabitants of one region (race) might evolve differently from those of another is synonymous with the concept of racism. There is no other way to explicate your argument.

I agree with the sentiment, but my point is, it's obvious to most that there are genetic differences among geographical locations brought about by evolution. I don't understand why evolution can only be possible from the neck down is all.

As for your questions, they are stupid questions which belie your lack of grasp of evolution by the assumptions you make.

The development of different physical traits is the result of particular phenotypic attributes being more prevalent because they are advantageous. These traits continue in the genome even if they are not advantageous. This means that you could take a thousand (a decent sized sample to include the full range in a population) let's say Swedes, and move them to an equatorial island and in several thousand years they will look a lot like equatorial people. You can then take a thousand of those descendants back to the Arctic Circle and in several thousand years they will look like Swedes again.

We're all Africans. The indigenous inhabitants of every continent have the same capacity to produce every phenotypic specimens.

 

[abandonconflict]

Just like the private messages you sent me asking for more pictures of myself?

Are you seriously this desperate? Get a life.

 

[ginwilly]

Yes, race. It is the only thing that can be gleaned from your speculation. That the indigenous inhabitants of one region (race) might evolve differently from those of another is synonymous with the concept of racism. There is no other way to explicate your argument..

These differences occur within the same races you dolt. It's not about race no matter how much you want it to be.

As for your questions, they are stupid questions which belie your lack of grasp of evolution by the assumptions you make.

The development of different physical traits is the result of particular phenotypic attributes being more prevalent because they are advantageous. These traits continue in the genome even if they are not advantageous. This means that you could take a thousand (a decent sized sample to include the full range in a population) let's say Swedes, and move them to an equatorial island and in several thousand years they will look a lot like equatorial people. You can then take a thousand of those descendants back to the Arctic Circle and in several thousand years they will look like Swedes again.

We're all Africans. The indigenous inhabitants of every continent have the same capacity to produce every phenotypic specimens.

So... what about cognitive difference developing because they are advantageous to the region? You conveniently skipped this. Is it impossible?

 

[sheskunk]

Are you seriously this desperate? Get a life.

It was you who private messaged me. I think the desperation lies on your end.