Teacher fired for breaking up fight.

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I respect property rights. Property rights would include your justly acquired property as well as your body.....but not the gerbil in YOUR body.
do property rights include the right to cause harm to others?

do property rights include the right to open a private club and exclude all the black people you want to?
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
No. You have drawn a conclusion that I am not going to defend, because that is not my belief. Race is irrelevant. All people have the right of self determination.

It's wrong to MAKE any person of any color serve another. You think it is okay to make people serve others. You are advocating force, I am not.
You keep ignoring the fact that you don't have to serve certain people if you don't want. All you have to do is deem your "club" private. You can then discriminate all you want..Oh be sure to charge a membership.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Wherefore doth thine non-aggression principal reconcile upon exclusive deed regarding innate wherewithal?
Was the wherewithal occupied? Was it being used?

You still haven't told me what you think a person can and cannot own.

Apparently based on your responses, you find it permisable for a coercive government to set those rules.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Was the wherewithal occupied? Was it being used?

You still haven't told me what you think a person can and cannot own.

Apparently based on your responses, you find it permisable for a coercive government to set those rules.
do you also hate property taxes
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
You keep ignoring the fact that you don't have to serve certain people if you don't want. All you have to do is deem your "club" private. You can then discriminate all you want..Oh be sure to charge a membership.

....and you keep ignoring the fact that your partner in initiating aggression against another is coercive government.

How do they get to decide? Aren't people free to own things and decide the use of it?
 
Last edited:

londonfog

Well-Known Member
....and you keep ignoring the fact that your partner in initiating aggression against another is coercive government.

How do they get to decide? Aren't people free to one things and decide the use of it?
LOL..initiating aggression because I just want a bite to eat at a public restaurant. WOW and WTF
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Was the wherewithal occupied? Was it being used?

You still haven't told me what you think a person can and cannot own.

Apparently based on your responses, you find it permisable for a coercive government to set those rules.
Gov't exists to serve the ruling class and protect private property.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
you know NODRAMA likes to create MODRAMA.
He has never been the same since his wife left him..damn farmer
throwing TVs at him as she went.

at least he has his farmer welfare to fall back to. and all his gold and guns. that'll keep him nice and warm on cold nights.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
you know NODRAMA likes to create MODRAMA.
He has never been the same since his wife left him..damn farmer
My wife never left me, you must be thinking of someone else. Thanks for the payment you and your wife made to me this week, I appreciate it. keep up the good work.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Certainly not based on skin color if ANY color is acceptable, therefore cannot be racist and IS a strawman.
"it's wrong to make any person of any color serve another"

how is that not based on skin color?

you realize this whole argument started due to robroy's opposition to civil rights, ya know?

that didn;t happen to have any skin colors associated with it, right?
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
throwing TVs at him as she went.

at least he has his farmer welfare to fall back to. and all his gold and guns. that'll keep him nice and warm on cold nights.
It was a small monitor, she only weighed 110 lbs at 5'6", unlike your porker that cannot be weighed due to the shearing force exerted on the devices. Safety is paramount.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
"it's wrong to make any person of any color serve another"

how is that not based on skin color?

you realize this whole argument started due to robroy's opposition to civil rights, ya know?

that didn;t happen to have any skin colors associated with it, right?
Do you think it would be better to make cigarettes illegal or keep educating people about the dangers of tobacco use and let them decide?
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Certainly not based on skin color if ANY color is acceptable, therefore cannot be racist and IS a strawman.
lets just get you on the record for this on going conversation. Do you think it's in the right of a business owner to tell someone to get out of his/her store based on color, religion, or weight ( I add weight because fat people makes me sad )
 
Top