Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
who preferred not to associate? the white racists. that's who you are defending.
the black customers wanted to associate.
the government stepped in to end the harm that the white racists were causing. association was a byproduct of ending the harm that the white racists caused.
you defend segregation, white separatism, and causing harm to blacks.
if the racists want to be left alone, they should not open a store to the public.
What do we call it when a boy wants to associate with a girl that doesn't? Oh yeah....rape.
Not wanting to associate with somebody is not the crime. Forcing an association is the crime.
The government has no place stepping in to "correct" a persons wishing to be left alone and replace it with a forced association.
You are essentially saying the girl that wouldn't let you in her pants is responsible for your blueballs.
What if the racist owned the store for a very long time? Did they willingly relinquish a portion of their ownership to your coercive government or was it taken from them by force or threats of force?