Satellite data proves Earth has not been warming the past 18 years - it's stable

[killemsoftly]

And thus I clothe my naked villainy
With old odd ends, stol'n forth of holy writ;
And seem a saint, when most I play the devil.

Yeah man, that EXACTLY what I mean, brillaint post to use the Skakespear to drive my point home even further.

We could hit the 'reset' button. You would have to apologize. Unless the Tourette's got the better of you. In which case, no apology needed.
I was dismissive but we both know you insulted me extensively the day before, never apologized and then wanted me to be your buddy.
We can start over. Show me I should bother.

 

[UncleBuck]

attempting to refute "Natural News" with "Skeptical Science"

it's like watching two retards pummel each other with pillowcases full of shit and doorknobs.

hilarious.

nice rebuttal.

"nuh uh! that's bullshit!" isn't really as effective as you seem to think it is.

 

[Dr Kynes]

nice rebuttal.

"nuh uh! that's bullshit!" isn't really as effective as you seem to think it is.

when both arguments are from BULLSHIT sources, how can the result not be hilarious.

 

[killemsoftly]

when both arguments are from BULLSHIT sources, how can the result not be hilarious.

 

[heckler73]

I won this by answering a Pinworm riddle...

 

[UncleBuck]

when both arguments are from BULLSHIT sources, how can the result not be hilarious.

reiterating "nuh uh! BULLSHIT!" is not a great form of rebuttal either.

maybe try it a third time and it'll work. we'll see.

 

[Padawanbater2]

attempting to refute "Natural News" with "Skeptical Science"

it's like watching two retards pummel each other with pillowcases full of shit and doorknobs.

hilarious.

Skeptical Science is a credible source. The only criticisms I've seen come from politically or financially (or both) motivated individuals or organizations, like Anthony Watts & the Heartland Institute.

Can you provide any criticisms from anyone not affiliated with such individuals or organizations?

 

[UncleBuck]

Skeptical Science is a credible source. The only criticisms I've seen come from politically or financially (or both) motivated individuals or organizations, like Anthony Watts & the Heartland Institute.

Can you provide any criticisms from anyone not affiliated with such individuals or organizations?

nuh uh! BULLSHIT.

 

[NoDrama]

now all you guys need is the science to prove you right.

good luck with that.

I don't need anything to prove me right, I haven't made any claims.

 

[Pinworm]

it's like watching two retards pummel each other with pillowcases full of shit and doorknobs.

hilarious.

Shuttup asshole. You're an asshole.

 

[heckler73]

Shuttup asshole. You're an asshole.

Just go to 1:24 if it doesn't start there.

 

[Pinworm]

Just go to 1:24 if it doesn't start there...

He called him Brian like 37 times.

 

[heckler73]

He called him Brian like 37 times.

Well, you gotta remember what we're doing here. We're building a better country. This is a gReAt NaTi0n, BrIaN, iT's A fAnTa$tIc CoUnTrY...

 

[Pinworm]

 

[Harrekin]

Just read this from MIT technical review.

http://www.technologyreview.com/news/526896/storing-greenhouse-gases-by-petrifying-them/

If this is the case with CO2 containing water pumped into geothermal wells, wouldn't the oceans be able to achieve the same result with all the dissolved CO2 they're supposedly absorbing?

 

[Ra$p0tin]

reiterating "nuh uh! BULLSHIT!" is not a great form of rebuttal either.

maybe try it a third time and it'll work. we'll see.

No more so then yours.

 

[killemsoftly]

^^^^
@##^+++--
mofo
ssol
smbb
gfya
emtea
negev

 

[Rob Roy]

^^^^
@##^+++--
mofo
ssol
smbb
gfya
emtea
negev

If you think about it, shoudn't it be "mofu" ? Just saying.

 

[killemsoftly]

If you think about it, shoudn't it be "mofu" ? Just saying.

I believe it's become a convention though i agree with your parse.
Dare I eat a peach?
Shall we dance the night away?
Care for a bevvy?

ukiah ufom!

 

[Doer]

I've repeatedly asked you a question so that I can understand your point of view: How is it that a computer scientist feels qualified to question climatologists? As in, most scientists and medical practitioners stick to an area.
You won't answer. So far. I could probably learn from you but you seem content not to answer and were quick to insult me.

Nevertheless: I take it back. Your not a phony. I apologize. What I should have said is: would it not be phony to opine on another area in science, blah, blah, blah.

Drama does seem sad to me. And angry. He is quick to insult and does not apolgize for insults when it's brought to his attention. To me insults mean you've lost, are weak and don't have self-control. It's an observation and I stand by it.
Perhaps I am not accounting for the fact that we are on the internet and norms are different here. Regardless, I believe in civility. If you feel or think I have crossed a line please bring it to my attention and I will address it.

Have a good day Doer.
You as well NoDrama.

peace

I had a guy at work the other day, like you, troll.

He says, (like Alex Baldwin) I asked you a QUESTION!

I said, taking a half step in, "I gave you NO ANSWER. (flat stare)"
He gulps, blinks and turns away.

(I would love to have a go with Baldwin, the coward)

Petty bullies.