An intelligent person, with no other positive character traits, like diligence, hard working, et cetera, will be a worthless fuck.
Science has proven God exists...
- Thread starter BigNBushy
- Start date
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Why would an "intelligent person" lack diligence and a work ethic?
Why would an intelligent person say that a person who lacks diligence and a work ethic would be intelligent?
Maybe you don't get out much.
I've met lots of smart people who were completely useless.
I mean, shit, I'm a pretty good example of it. I graduated undergrad with honors, scored really well on the LSAT, never got a bad grade in law school, even made deans list twice.
Then I wound up on heroin after yet another knee surgery and a huge bottle of percocet.
Intelligence is important, but with nothing more, it is useless.
Fuck Obama is super smart, but he can't get shit done. Why? Because he has poor leadership qualities. No one wants to follow him. He couldn't even get his super majority to do much with him his first two years.
I saw it in law school. Almost without fail, the hardest working students did the best, and they weren't always the smartest.
Last edited:
That's true, but they are pretty close to the same thing.
I would say smart involves more application.
While intelligence is the ability to comprehend.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
You are talking about things you know nothing about, again
Intelligence encompases all aspects of a person. It has nothing to do with "anything more"
If you're not intelligent, you are useless
Obama "can't get shit done" because your expectation of how politics works is wrong
Interesting anecdote, tell it to someone who cares
You mean his party didn't hold both houses of Congress the first two years of his reign, and he got more than a health care law without a public option?
killemsoftly
Well-Known Member
I agree.
Smart people do well.
Brilliant people not so well often.
Mensa types are often fucked.
Our IQ testing looks for certain things.
Emotional intelligence is not one of them. This is a critical skill set in life.
Lacking it is fatal.
Go to mensa. You'll see.
The worst thing you can do to someone under 30 is tell them their IQ.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Like I said, you don't understand how politics works
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
IQ testing is fundamentally flawed, its just ANOTHER method the overlords have of suppressing the sheeple.
Wake up, bro.
killemsoftly
Well-Known Member
I tested at 58. So I figured the psychologist was an Illuminati. I followed him home from work one day so I knew where he lived. Burned that motherfucking house to the cinders bro. But first I entertained him with a blowtorch. Now I'm working those bastards from the INSIDE!
You seem sympathetic to our cause. Could we use your basement as a safehouse? We're running an op out of Ireland. Our target involves several Illumaniti posing as royals as well as 2-4 Bilderbergs. I promise we won't bother the ladies.
just give it a thought. I'll pm you my tor info. We'll talk bro.
ever hear of the old testament?
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
They need a middle testicle...
Its weird that God turned from a Pirate to a Puppydog from the old to the new testicle...I wana know why he changed his mind?
Doer
Well-Known Member
Close but after a lifetime (since my 20s, now 62) of guru meditation, I understand there is much more to self than we grasp, day to day.
So, man is not God, but to me the higher aspects of SELF are universal and very powerfully GOOD.
i just add another letter. Man is GOOD.
That is what we all want. And it has not an ounce of woo-woo, or any stricture.
God is Mans highest SELF. Very real and not just hope for faith and belief in old stories, is how I see. So, even the religions are not wrong,
They look in the wrong direction, like the story of Plato's Cave.
The Universe is our Father, but not necessarily our Creator. And since I can imagine the imagine impinging me, endless and boundless SELF without even Identity, I can understand that the Universe needs no Creator.
In fact in Quantum Physics, it is looking like we create it all by observing. It is called Continuous Creation Model, as the only explanation so far the fact that we cannot find NOW in science,
Is one googleplex of a second, NOW, or is it 1/2 of that? See what I mean? It is already gone but it is still NOW.
You cannot define NOW with math.
We create REALITY, as we go?
(this is the opposite of Ayn Rand Objectivity-Illusion)
We may be creating it all by force of SELF WILL so as to know GOOD in all its aspects.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Plenty of old people think that they know shit just because they are old. Granted, you have had more time to learn and experience but you have also had more time to get filled with horse shit that seems like good ideas.
Just because you're old doesn't mean everything you say is correct.
Just because you're old doesn't mean everything you say is correct.
killemsoftly
Well-Known Member
There is no creation
Just sublimation
I like that. I think I'll trademark that.
It's not as good as the Nuremburg Defense but hey