• Here is a link to the full explanation: https://rollitup.org/t/welcome-back-did-you-try-turning-it-off-and-on-again.1104810/

Can coverups be covered up, legally?

ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
killemsoftly said:
Are these the same guys who tried to impeach another president for getting his knob gobbled then gave another pres a pass on how he was gonna fund 2 foreign wars?
Click to expand...
Is that what your history class taught you Clinton was impeached for?

I refuse to justify wars in the middle east whether funded or unfunded, so that dog won't hunt.

I wonder why the lie was told to us in the beginning, why the lies are being lied about now, and would like to see things like that stopped or at least have people held accountable for doing it. I don't understand why people are against finding the truth.
 
Wavels

Wavels

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
Is that what your history class taught you Clinton was impeached for?

I refuse to justify wars in the middle east whether funded or unfunded, so that dog won't hunt.

I wonder why the lie was told to us in the beginning, why the lies are being lied about now, and would like to see things like that stopped or at least have people held accountable for doing it. I don't understand why people are against finding the truth.
Click to expand...

Yes ginwilly, you have exposed the truth, in that, Clinton was impeached for lying about having his knob gobbled, and certainly not the act itself.
Very simple.
He attempted to cover it up, and in doing so, exposed himself to impeachment.
If, he had told the truth, things would have played out differently.
 
Wavels

Wavels

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i have already cited quite clearly within this very thread WTFIATA.

in the "47%" tapes, romney clearly says he will attempt his best to exploit any kind of foreign policy crisis that comes up.

recall post #30

in the Jimmy Carter election, the fact that we have hostages in Iran, I mean, that was all we talked about. And we had the two helicopters crash in the desert, I mean that's—that was—that was the focus, and so him solving that made all the difference in the world. I'm afraid today if you said, "We got Iran to agree to stand down a nuclear weapon," they'd go hold on. It's really a, but…by the way, if something of that nature presents itself, I will work to find a way to take advantage of the opportunity.


so the manufacture of this non-scnadal was premeditated. it was then pushed heavily for months by the republican media arm, the liars and propagandists over at FOX news.

but it went beyond that. the GOP got caught trying to lie and alter emails in order to strengthen what little non-scandal they had to work with.

recall post #29:




so the manufacture was premeditated from the very top, pushed hard by the top propaganda mill of the republican party, and lies and deceptions were pushed by the GOP as well (maliciously) since they had no case in this manufactured non-scandal.

as far as burying the voting record, you were warned about that well ahead of the attack.

recall post #22:



so there ya go. that is WTFIATA.

this was premeditated, manufactured by propagandists, pushed by liars, attempted to be made worse by deception, and the voting record is being buried. lying, altering emails, deceiving, manufacturing.

it's all BULLSHIT. and if you had eyes for anything other than this non-scandal that you have been duped into believing in, you wouldn't have even had to ask me to explain it since i have posted it all already in this very thread.

fucking republicans.
Click to expand...
Your Benghazi defense is stale, it is obsolete, that was then, this is now.
Please attempt to deal with current news.
Dear Buck you are so predictably ignorant of current political news that it renders your post to be nothing less than a parody of liberal blissful ignorance!
 
Canna Sylvan

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
Wavels said:
Your Benghazi defense is stale, it is obsolete, that was then, this is now.
Please attempt to deal with current news.
Dear Buck you are so predictably ignorant of current political news that it renders your post to be nothing less than a parody of liberal blissful ignorance!
Click to expand...
I think Buck is actually Iraqwarwrong.

http://iraqwarwrong.blogspot.com/2004/06/note-on-terminology.html

iraqwarwrong said:
I was watching Three Kings (good flick, but not enough action!) and I realized that something can cause confusion so I decided to clear up it.

When I say The Iraq War I mean the one we just fought, with George W. Bush as President. (The one that was wrong)

Yes (don't write letters!), I am aware there was another, different war involving Iraq once, when George H.W. Bush was President. But the name of that war isThe Gulf War, and probably it was wrong too, but that's beyond the scope of this blog.

Which, to remind, is about The Iraq War. Being wrong.

P.S. Someone can feel free to create a sister blog about The Gulf War being wrong and I'd be happy to link to it. I like to stay focused here though.
Click to expand...
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Wavels said:
Please attempt to deal with current news.
Click to expand...
ok, i will not focus on the premeditated nature of this non-scandal, the lies and altered emails that you idiots got busted trying to do, and the voting record which shows the GOP was warned about the danger of their votes to cut embassy security.

let's focus on something more recent then.




woops, no one cares.
 
Wavels

Wavels

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
ok, i will not focus on the premeditated nature of this non-scandal, the lies and altered emails that you idiots got busted trying to do, and the voting record which shows the GOP was warned about the danger of their votes to cut embassy security.

let's focus on something more recent then.




woops, no one cares.
Click to expand...
Maybe you should look at the fact that the recently judicially compelled release of e-mails (almost two years later), at the very least, indicates that the Administration was less than forthright in it's initial response to Congressional inquiries.
Your best defense is truly and only, that no one cares?
The public is apathetic and you guys will easily skate on this.

Keep it up, it should all work out.
It is all about the now obvious attempted cover-up.
Best of luck maintaining this ruse for very much longer.
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
I am not sure his talking point is going very far.

- I don't think anyone has made up anything

- I have watched it in detail

- I have seen a lot of smug disrespect for the process

- a Committee has been formed to collate all this

- of course it is politics

- the noose was self placeed the night they didn't even try
 
Bugeye

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
There's about as much chance of the Repubs dropping this as there would be of the Dems dropping evidence that Christie lied about Bridgegate.

Taking out your political adversaries is an old game. Why not root around for more documents that could take Hillary out of the game?
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
It the allegations are just all made up, why the tap dance? Why lie to UN? Why tell the world for 2 weeks, a death dealing LIE to incite riots and try to steal an election already won... like.... Nixon?

I'll tell you what is going on.

THIS IS JEOPARDY!
I'll take Politics for $200.

If there are witches

Daryl?

When is a witch hunt, necessary?

CORRECT!!!!
 
Last edited:
tip top toker

tip top toker

Well-Known Member
what coverups? The government never lies to you. you clearly just hate america for thinking such things, you should move to a different country.
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Most are too young....not you Rollie, to remember Watergate.

And if you do remember, and were not-partisan, as I was, you have a front row seat for this.

A cover up to get elected is not cool.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top