US college professor demands imprisonment for climate-change deniers

Status
Not open for further replies.

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
When there is data that all confirms the same hypothesis, it's a consensus based on facts and observations.

A right wing think tank fueled by big oil companies that ignores the overwhelming evidence (see above) for climate change, is not legit.
Wrong answer.

Consensus is NEVER scientific.

BTW most people believe humans influence the climate, I'm just opposed to the 90+℅ figure as it has been shown that climate is in a constant state of change, that atmospheric CO2 concentrations have been much higher in the past without human activity and that climate change is a HUGE money business with monied influence and agenda on both sides.

That said, I believe we should take better care of this rock we live on and would encourage rather than penalising companies for producing carbon that we encourage science that will advance us past fossil fuels rather than stalling our advance beyond them with a lack of logistics, etc.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
I haven't seen evidence of this
Look back outside the cherrypicked data ranges the IPCC uses.

Just like the markets, you cant judge the quality of a stock by looking at a graph for only today.

I love science, but the IPCC do not go about it correctly and all the pseudo studies in the world won't change my mind.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
Look back outside the cherrypicked data ranges the IPCC uses.

Just like the markets, you cant judge the quality of a stock by looking at a graph for only today.

I love science, but the IPCC do not go about it correctly and all the pseudo studies in the world won't change my mind.
I think Paddy became an evangelical global alarmist. Time doesn't start until we first did temperature measurements. Those core ice samples are from the debil Big Oil to fool us! Shame on you. What can we expect from a ginger who can't count to potato.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
I think Paddy became an evangelical global alarmist. Time doesn't start until we first did temperature measurements. Those core ice samples are from the debil Big Oil to fool us! Shame on you. What can we expect from a ginger who can't count to potato.
And that's why so many of your companies come here to produce their products, even though we're uncompetitive in the cost of labour?

Keep telling yourself the US is no 1....

Theres people in Syria, Crimea, etc that would currently strongly disagree.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member

Pinworm

Well-Known Member
I didn't get to read the paper and honestly won't have time to or evaluate the sources for it.

However it seems to be a pseudo study which immediately pisses me off, regardless of content.
IDK. Heckler is definitely NOT known for posting faulty references. In fact, quite the opposite. I'd push a little further to say that he's one of the one's that still plays by the "actual rules". Yes, it's a subjective yadda blah..blah..fart.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
IDK. Heckler is definitely NOT known for posting faulty references. In fact, quite the opposite. I'd push a little further to say that he's one of the one's that still plays by the "actual rules". Yes, it's a subjective yadda blah..blah..fart.
From just a cursory glance, I'm pretty sure he's trying to set a trap for me tbh.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
Do you think climate means weather? lol
That sir, is about the most funny thing you have ever said.... without actually calling a name or stooping to debate. :)

Do you think it does not? So now, climate and weather are no longer synonyms?

Anything is possible, I guess.... In Crazy Town.

cli·mate
ˈklīmit/
noun
noun: climate; plural noun: climates
  1. 1.​
    the weather conditions prevailing in an area in general or over a long period.
    "our cold, wet climate"
    synonyms:weather conditions, weather; More
    atmospheric conditions
    "the mild climate"
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Look back outside the cherrypicked data ranges the IPCC uses.

Just like the markets, you cant judge the quality of a stock by looking at a graph for only today.

I love science, but the IPCC do not go about it correctly and all the pseudo studies in the world won't change my mind.
Look.. The IPCC is the best resource we have for studying the climate. The only reason it has come into question is because conservatives who disagree with its findings for political reasons. Not scientific ones. This has been demonstrated, and any time any of the information that comes out of the IPCC is questioned it's later exonerated. These conclusions are seemingly dismissed while the trials are the only thing that matters. This guy was questioned so he must be full of bullshit! Not science.

I say again, anyone who has questioned the IPCC report does so with little/no evidence of any wrongdoing and has an agenda to fulfill. This, again, is completely demonstrable, and those that choose not to see it are only harming themselves in the long run.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top