twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Don't forget john galt denial, inflation is in check and limited rights from unlimited gubberment>unlimited rights and limited gubberment.
More Global Warming
- Thread starter kelly4
- Start date
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
Are you suggesting the former NASA employees are working for Breibart now? Getting cash from the CATO institute? Or, is it you got nothing, so you spray your bile at any target you can conjure? Your ass is showing.too embarrassed to attribute your little article, eh?
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/03/08/Earth-is-safe-from-global-warming-say-the-men-who-put-man-on-the-moon
yep, breitbart. they of the shirley sherrod debacle. some credible mother fuckers.
replete with links to wattsupwiththtat (dumbass) and the CATO institute (but i bet you guys hate politicization of this, eh?).
all this followed by a vigorous circle jerk amongst the flat earth society, the same folks who bought into the skewed polls nonsense (seriously, do you guys ever embarrassed? have you no shame?).
monumentally stupid stuff here guys.
Are you also suggesting "the war on women" attack is just a figment of my imagination? It's not something that has been hammered time and time again BY LIBERALS? Do tell us how it fits in with conspiracy theories.
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
Here ya go, I got the "little" report without the Breitbart link, since the fact they wrote a piece about the report somehow tarnishes it in advanced delusional schizophrenia with involuntary raging OCD land.
http://therightclimatestuff.com/BoundingClimateSensitivityForRegDecisions.pdf
http://therightclimatestuff.com/BoundingClimateSensitivityForRegDecisions.pdf
Wavels
Well-Known Member
That's interesting because the "flat earthers" were the "consensus" believers of their day, it was widely held by "scientists" then that the world was flat.
"Consensus" said then that this was so.
Wow it turned out they were wrong.
Who would've thought that claims of consensus could ever ever be bogus.
They were proven to be incorrect
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
global warming is a jewish illuminati collectivist UN agenda 21 scheme.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i'd call you a historical revisionist, but that doesn't quite encompass what you do to history here.
this is more like shitting on history, raping it, and setting it on fire.
you should probably brush up on historical facts before opening your mouth and removing all doubt.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
common core, 1984, agenda 21, collectivism, war on women.
yet somehow i'm sputtering and apoplectic.
project much?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
None of those former NASA employees have conducted any climate science research
The project seems to be headed by H. Leighton Steward, a 77-year-old former oil and gas executive. The press release also links the NASA group to his website, "co2isgreen", which also has an extensive history of receiving fossil fuel industry funding.
you dumbasses fell for this simple appeal to authority, even thought the authorities have no expertise in climate science whatsoever.
keep removing all doubt, this is quite fun.
agenda 21. common core. 1984. war on women. small houses. collectivism. gay communist fluoride babies. ayn rand. liberty. constitution. i have won the debate.
Doer
Well-Known Member
I see? How can I have a stoke like that?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you don't need to go that far, just attend a circle jerk at your local flat-earth society. there's one a few posts back.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
In April of 2012, 49 former NASA employees sent a letter to the current NASA administrator requesting that he effectively muzzle the climate scientists at NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS). None of those former NASA employees have conducted any climate science research, but based on their own lack of understanding of the subject, they objected to the conclusions drawn by the climate experts at NASA GISS. This letter drew media attention because folks who have worked at NASA are well-respected (and rightly so), but there was really no substance to it, or any particular reason to lend it credence. Astronauts and engineers are not climate experts.
Now in January of 2013, a group of 20 "Apollo era NASA retirees" has put together a rudimentary climate "report" and issued a press release declaring that they have decided human-caused global warming is not "settled" and is nothing to worry about. This time around they have not listed the 20 individuals who contributed to this project, but have simply described the group as being:
"...comprised of renowned space scientists with formal educational and decades career involvement in engineering, physics, chemistry, astrophysics, geophysics, geology and meteorology. Many of these scientists have Ph.Ds"
The project seems to be headed by H. Leighton Steward, a 77-year-old former oil and gas executive. The press release also links the NASA group to his website, "co2isgreen", which also has an extensive history of receiving fossil fuel industry funding.
(In 2009, the group launched a website, www.co2isgreen.net to promote its agenda and encourage public participation. The site links to Plants Need CO2, a group whose named principal is H. Leighton Steward, who is the Chairman of the Board of The Institute for the Study of Earth and Man at Southern Methodist University. The Institute funded by Exxon Mobil, Shell Oil, Hunt Oil, Lyco Energy Corporation, and Five States Energy Corporation.) http://sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Co2_is_Green
This story can be summed up very simply: a group of retired NASA scientists with no climate science research experience listened to a few climate scientists and a few fossil fuel-funded contrarian scientists, read a few climate blogs, asked a few relatively simple questions, decided that those questions cannot be answered (though we will answer them in this post), put together a very rudimentary report, and now expect people to listen to them because they used to work at NASA. It's purely an appeal to authority, except that the participants have no authority or expertise in climate science.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/NASA-retirees-letter2.html
You're misunderstanding "no scientific consensus" for "scientific consensus" ---> Before modern science, there was no scientific consensus on the shape of the Earth, after experiments were conducted and science was utilized, it was discovered the Earth was round, then the scientific consensus accepted it as fact after peer review
Red1966
Well-Known Member
You seem to have your own world history. Also your own definitions for "consensus", "science", and "peer review". You're quite amusing.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
yet you dare not elaborate why because it would just make you look foolish.
stop withholding my amusement.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
kill it with fire.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Hahahahahahahaha so funny you want him to see that shit soooooooo bad but no-one cares about your hateful bullshit.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
not sure if your asshurt binge is meth or alcohol induced.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Red does not give a shit dude give it up, it is amusing watching you try time after time but its getting a little sad.
I will post this song as your tribute to him so that he may hear its message:
[youtube]CVS5rS_da9E[/youtube]
I will post this song as your tribute to him so that he may hear its message:
[youtube]CVS5rS_da9E[/youtube]