Liberal censorship - We know you can burn a book, but can you light a kindle?

[OGEvilgenius]

Nailed it​//////////////

And look up the financiers and founders of Greenpeace. Greenpeace was the first organization to come out against the GCC. Greenpeace receives a lot of money from Oil Magnates by the name of the Rockefellers, amongst others.

 

[Padawanbater2]

And look up the financiers and founders of Greenpeace. Greenpeace was the first organization to come out against the GCC. Greenpeace receives a lot of money from Oil Magnates by the name of the Rockefellers, amongst others.

Like I said before, the idea that the valid science requires the person who came up with it or the number one proponent of it is a logical fallacy

Charles Darwin could have come out and said the theory of evolution was bullshit on his deathbed, it would not have weakened the strength of the theory of evolution because the science backs it up regardless of what Charles Darwin might have personally believed (he wholeheartedly accepted the theory of evolution up to his death, this is just an example)

Greenpeace, PETA, Obama, the entirety of the G8 could come out and publicly denounce ACC tomorrow, it wouldn't mean shit regarding the valid science that supports it

Get another talking point and learn how science works

 

[OGEvilgenius]

Like I said before, the idea that the valid science requires the person who came up with it or the number one proponent of it is a logical fallacy

Charles Darwin could have come out and said the theory of evolution was bullshit on his deathbed, it would not have weakened the strength of the theory of evolution because the science backs it up regardless of what Charles Darwin might have personally believed (he wholeheartedly accepted the theory of evolution up to his death, this is just an example)

Greenpeace, PETA, Obama, the entirety of the G8 could come out and publicly denounce ACC tomorrow, it wouldn't mean shit regarding the valid science that supports it

Get another talking point and learn how science works

You're the guy who was whole heartedly endorsing another guy who was claiming all those whose science doesn't confirm receive money from Oil Interests. Guess what? All those who do confirm receive money from the same people.

You might want to stop being emotional (ie: This entire post above in which you seem to forget that you were the one actually doing the thing you claimed I was doing - I wasn't, I was just throwing that bullshit in your face because it's bullshit).

You might want to examine what's happening on other planets in our solar system and come up with explanations for that behavior as well. Because they are also experiencing similar things.

 

[kpmarine]

You're the guy who was whole heartedly endorsing another guy who was claiming all those whose science doesn't confirm receive money from Oil Interests. Guess what? All those who do confirm receive money from the same people.

You might want to stop being emotional (ie: This entire post above in which you seem to forget that you were the one actually doing the thing you claimed I was doing - I wasn't, I was just throwing that bullshit in your face because it's bullshit).

You might want to examine what's happening on other planets in our solar system and come up with explanations for that behavior as well. Because they are also experiencing similar things.

Care to provide a source?

 

[Padawanbater2]

You're the retard who was claiming all those whose science doesn't confirm receive money from Oil Interests. Guess what? All those who do confirm receive money from the same people.

You might want to stop being emotional (ie: This entire post above in which you seem to forget that you were the one actually doing the thing you claimed I was doing - I wasn't, I was just throwing that bullshit in your face because it's bullshit).

Another dummy who doesn't understand the scientific process of peer review

Canndo already addressed this earlier

 

[NLXSK1]

Another dummy who doesn't understand the scientific process of peer review

Canndo already addressed this earlier

The earth hasnt been warming for 17 years. You might want to take your own advice.

 

[Padawanbater2]

The earth hasnt been warming for 17 years. You might want to take your own advice.

2011 North American heat wave

The 2011 North American heat wave was a deadly summer 2011 heat wave that affected the Southern Plains, Midwestern United States, Eastern Canada, Northeastern United States, and much of the Eastern Seaboard, and had temperatures reaching upwards of 131 °F (55 °C) on the Heat index/Humidex ratings. On a national basis, the heat wave was the hottest in 75 years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_North_American_heat_wave#Record_heat

2010–13 Southern United States drought

The 2010–2013 Southern United States drought is a severe to extreme ongoing drought plaguing the US South, including parts of Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina. The worst effects have been in Texas, where near-record drought has parched the state since January 2011. Texas suffered an estimated $7.62 billion in crop and livestock losses, surpassing its record loss of $4.1 billion in 2006. In Texas, combined with the rest of the South, at least $10 billion in agricultural losses were recorded in 2011. In 2010-11, Texas experienced its driest August–July (12-month) period on record.

The 2011 drought was the worst one-year drought in Texas since 1895. The U.S. Drought Monitor reports that Lubbock, Texas has experienced the nation’s worst average level of drought since the beginning of 2011. McAllen, Harlingen, Brownsville and Corpus Christi also ranked among the nine U.S. cities most affected by extreme drought.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010–2012_Southern_United_States_drought

NOAA: Past Decade Warmest on Record According to Scientists in 48 Countries

http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/20100728_stateoftheclimate.html

https://www.skepticalscience.com/global-cooling.htm

https://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-stopped-in-1998.htm

 

[UncleBuck]

The earth hasnt been warming for 17 years.

then why has it been warming over the last 17 years, and why does no scientist at all back you up on that claim?



is this kinda like the romney lead in the polls you kept imagining existed, but which never actually existed at any point ever?

 

[heckler73]

I have completed phase II of my study.

Over the last week, I came across a recent paper that suggested the HADCRUT4 data may have potential errors in it.
I'll spare the details, but this forced me to consider using the GISS data instead for the monthly analysis.

I've spent the better part of the last 6 hours figuring out a shitload of new techniques and functions in IGOR, so I could present this colourful picture of evidence for the purposes of debate.

Hooray for you all.


The black line is the first instance where I could say the slope was flat. Yes, it still had a b-value of 0.005 or so, but at that scale, a butterfly's fart could change the temperature. The purple line is the 17 year regression, with the coefficient values (don't forget the scale modifier on the left axis).
Now if "deniers" want to call that flat, I could accept that withing error bounds. But is it anything to get excited over?



Would you look at that? I MEAN WOULD YOU JUST LOOK AT THAT?!?!?!

Look at that slope for the 307 month period. That's as flat as the temperature change gets when the butterfly HOLDS its fart in!

In conclusion, there is an argument for those that say the rate of change has stalled, but it's still not conclusive evidence the trend has reversed when compared with precedent.
Therefore, I need more funding for 10 years to collect more data.
Give it to me now. Someone, let me borrow your Obamaphone so I can call up the president and get this settled!
$1.5Mn will be enough, thanks.
But if you call in the next 20 minutes--because you know we can't do this all day--you can get my research for only $150k !
That's a savings of a gajillion percent!!!
But wait, order now and you'll get a FREE LED!
Genuine 3W of quality Chinese craftsmanship.

Handjobs and Bitcoin not accepted.

 

[heckler73]

Global Warming is being caused by all the hot air spewed by RIU libtards.

That's all the raw data you need.

I can't say that would be adequate. For one, politicians spew the most hot-air per capita, therefore it is unlikely "libtards" on RIU are responsible (unless there are secret members of Congress or Parliament on here...maybe Justin Trudeau?)
Of course, one could use quantum computing arguments for heat generation due to rampant edits. Deleting information has a work value associated with it, eh.
However, that subject is beyond my ken and not of great interest to me.
I'd rather blame plasma. It's my favourite anti-hero, of the moment.

HANNES ALFVEN and RALPH JUERGENS FTW!

 

[Harrekin]

I can't say that would be adequate. For one, politicians spew the most hot-air per capita, therefore it is unlikely "libtards" on RIU are responsible (unless there are secret members of Congress or Parliament on here...maybe Justin Trudeau?)
Of course, one could use quantum computing arguments for heat generation due to rampant edits. Deleting information has a work value associated with it, eh.
However, that subject is beyond my ken and not of great interest to me.
I'd rather blame plasma. It's my favourite anti-hero, of the moment.

HANNES ALFVEN and RALPH JUERGENS FTW!

You don't believe in Stellar Fusion?

 

[heckler73]

You don't believe in Stellar Fusion?

In what sense? Gravity-fed reactions of limitless hydrogen supplies (whose varying mass has no effect on orbits)? I have a couple issues with that.
I like the idea of a greater role for electromagnetism in stellar activity. Gravity carries too much weight in the standard model (there is a pun in there, yes).

 

[Harrekin]

In what sense? Gravity-fed reactions of limitless hydrogen supplies (whose varying mass has no effect on orbits)? I have a couple issues with that.
I like the idea of a greater role for electromagnetism in stellar activity. Gravity carries too much weight in the standard model (there is a pun in there, yes).

I like your style, and can't comprehensively discount your hypothesis...

So we can agree to disagree

But fusion is observable in a laboratory situation.

 

[heckler73]

I like your style, and can't comprehensively discount your hypothesis...

So we can agree to disagree

But fusion is observable in a laboratory situation.

Have you heard about the Tokamak?
PLENTY of fusion in there, too.
So I can agree to agree, just from a different angle.

 

[Harrekin]

Have you heard about the Tokamak?
PLENTY of fusion in there, too.
So I can agree to agree, just from a different angle.

Yes, but doesn't that essentially discount the Electric Sun hypothesis?

 

[heckler73]

Yes, but doesn't that essentially discount the Electric Sun hypothesis?

I don't believe Politics is the best forum for that discussion.
Try here:
https://www.rollitup.org/technology-science/765088-electric-sun.html