Actually he's citing a WaPo article from July 9, 1971. Pretty shitty deflection. I wonder if you're this emotional or you're just deliberately deceitful. Either way, poor form.you just cited climatedepot.com, which was started by political scientist marc morano, whose career began working for rush limbaugh, and whose website is funded by political magnate richard scaife, before bemoaning "politically driven scientific bael [SIC]".
not only do you love hitler and white supremacy, but you also just self-owned yourself harder than i've ever seen anyone else self-own.
hilarious in its utter douchebaggery.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Morano
They mentioned "climate change" at the end of the article when forecasting a 40% cut in avocado production.Here is mind fuck. Blaming the CA drought on Global Warming. Niotice how CNN is not so stupid as to call it climate change. They still need to sell Ad spots.
You might want to brush up on your critical thinking skills. I thought you had an open mind.Then no, you don't accept the theory of evolution.. Evolution happens, but not to humans? wut..
It is slander the person to protect the Saganist Lie. It is formally called in Rhetoric, the argumentum ad hominem.Actually he's citing a WaPo article from July 9, 1971. Pretty shitty deflection. I wonder if you're this emotional or you're just deliberately deceitful. Either way, poor form.
What would they lose exactly?Like I said, there is no controversy among scientific professionals, the perceived controversy exists among scientifically illiterate people and is fueled by right wing propaganda. Anyone can see this for themselves, simply take a look at who is funding the anti-climate change propaganda, it's energy companies, not scientists. It would stand to reason that energy companies would have a lot to lose by people transitioning to alternative sources of energy, right?
Yup.Yeah, umm well you see, this person named Nikola Tesla, already invented a device which could have powered every home, all of our cars, and anything we needed for free and without wires.
Tesla made the modern age possible. Radio, Robotics, Remote control, AC Current, RADAR, Generators, The X-ray, hydro-electric power, Tesla Coil, Fluorescent lights, LASER, wireless communication (Cell phones too), radio astronomy, neon lights, electric motors are just a few of his many inventions. Probably the most towering intellect ever on the face of earth.
Ever heard of the Philadelphia experiment where a entire ship was teleported? Tesla. Ever heard of weather control through HAARP? Tesla.
He spoke 8 languages fluently. He could recite the entire Bible verse by verse chapter by chapter from memory.
Smart dude, no one remembers him, but they remember Edison, and Edison didn't invent anything.
Einstein was once asked what it felt like to be the smartest man alive. Einsteins reply was I dont know, youll have to ask Nikola Tesla.
But, what was the CNN Headline? And what prompted them to dig into the finance forecast, is what MoneyCNN does.They mentioned "climate change" at the end of the article when forecasting a 40% cut in avocado production.
Mixed message?
All these PattyBucks are somewhat retarded, don't you know?What would they lose exactly?
You do realize who owns the patents for alternative energy sources, right?
Peak oil was a theory created by the oil companies. I wonder why?
That is funny since you act like you just work up yesterday, and even failed at that.are you hopped up on meth? because your thoughts are going from right field to left field in no time flat.
you talk about the constitution, and then you talk about wars which haven't been declared in many decades.
you talk about energy efficient grow lights which i never claimed existed, and you flip how tax credits for smart investments that will save you money work.
caught me by surprise since i half expected you to go on a 16th amendment rant based on what part of my post you chose to quote.
i might just be high on cat piss fumes from several years ago still, but i am having trouble keeping up with all of your crazy diversions and conspiracy theories and meth talk.
Deliberately deceitful for agenda. He is no dumb bunny, that much is obvious.Actually he's citing a WaPo article from July 9, 1971. Pretty shitty deflection. I wonder if you're this emotional or you're just deliberately deceitful. Either way, poor form.
Sounds reasonable to me. CNN is just as sensationalist as FOX or MSNBC.But, what was the CNN Headline? And what prompted them to dig into the finance forecast, is what MoneyCNN does.
What prompted the Corporation is obvious. Blame shedding.
What prompted CNN to go with that headline? Mind Fuck.
Who finances most AGW research? Oh, it's the same people, through different channels. This line of argument is weak, because the money behind all this is funding both sides of the argument. For example Greenpeace receives a lot of money from the Rockefeller foundation. Greenpeace was one of the first to scream about the GCC being industry schills. Yet, they receive a lot of funding from big time share holders in said industry.The fact that this post got no attention is more than a little interesting - there is truth in the notion that the right tends to hold truth and accuracy second to their particular beliefs, which, of course has them see higher education and scientific endeavors as suspect.
Ahh yes, solar panels and energy efficiency. That's a good one. Last I saw it took more energy to create one than they could ever recover.all these goddamn federal laws letting us keep more of our money if we install solar panels or energy efficient appliances are such a bummer. i feel like they should pass an amendment protecting me from these tax breaks. that's freedom because liberty. constitution. fluoride.
Fuckin .......A.It is slander the person to protect the Saganist Lie. It is formally called in Rhetoric, the argumentum ad hominem.
Technically it is considered a genetic fallacy of logic, in the subclass of irrelevance.
That is the height of Buck MO here, if you have noticed. It just is lower self debasesment from there.