Are you kidding me? What is accepted as proof, is proof. You want to equivocate on what is proof? Consensus is not Proof. The Church has complete consensus on a Fairy tale.
And a pick and choose poll of "top scientists" is not even consensus of anything except Rice Bowl clinging.
In math there is proof and in science there is proof. But, we can only prove our Current Understanding. You are trying to develop a CA, politically and call on science to prove it,while calling the consensus, evidence.
We, in science cannot go there. And I say we, because I am deep into weather modeling on vast compute resources, these days. Every time we do a breakthrough in Hardware, our group produces new computation science to harness that. Patents fly around, etc.
That last sentence is wrong. But, the answer is quite easy and I have said before and you are not listening. Here is proof for me.
- Models in Cloud Effect, that AGREE with SAT data, land and sea sub-surface data. IT DOES NOT.
---------Simply put the models predict warming but when we apply to current data, NO WARMING
- Create a Model that can show this 17 years of no warming in the atmosphere
- Show any result of warming
------20 meter ocean depth warming
------sea level rise, year over year
------a decease of sea ice Albedo in either WINTER
------a slowing of the Gulf Stream and the Arctic descending current
So, stop trying to pretend you know anything about science or how it works or what has to be proved.
You don't even have a Theory. Nice try, That is the top of Science and you don't have it. So, without that you have muttering conjecture, childish right fights of politic, and desperate polling for Rice Bowl. And you have data sets that make your climate models look stupid. So, some basic education for you.
Big Bang is Theory and yet, it is just about falsified already for me. Plenty of other, better (imo) math now. For a Theory, all 1)observation has to agree with 2) the math and vice verse. For Big Bang those 2 are now divergent.
For AGW, you have nothing...less than nothing. New Colonialism to me. Play on the superstition, keep their societies from using current Tech and play up for $$, the superior science of Whites.
So, this is AGW Snake Oil, not Theory.