Honestly, George, I think you lie to yourself constantly: instead of keeping with the admission that you don't know the specifics of something, you make them up for various reasons. You convince yourself of the least likely answer by using logical fallacies, partly because you are too lazy to look at the links I posted and familiarize yourself with them. Once you convince yourself via a faulty thinking process you then believe your own errors, so what you say isn't technically lies. What you say is still erroneous, though, because it didn't happen in reality. There is no your truth and my truth, there is objective reality, and what we believe either corresponds with the happenings of objective reality or they do not...
Most of what I read from you is wrong, so it's not hard to show you where I see the many errors. Sometimes you post really lucid, insightful things and I'm quick to point out when I witness that. It would be nice if those posts became the majority, though...
So to clarify, there's zero (naught) chance you saw an alien but you are claiming to have seen one, anyway. Got it. Thanks for making my point for me...
Right...
In this case, I'd urge members to choose the latter. Taking into consideration your beliefs (that you're christ, see aliens, multiple hospitaliztions, etc..) and rants, I think a jury would have to take your testimony on anything with a shaker of salt. Eye witness testimony is infamously unreliable, although it usually holds weight with juries. Much of the time, when police ask ten eye witnesses exactly what they saw after a crime occurred, they will get ten very different testimonies. This is because there are many factors in memory in human consciousness. Anxiety, stress, weapon (or other) focus, etc.. Many people assume that our memories work much like a video recorder, and that our brains store info similarly, and can be recalled simalarly. This isn't the case, the brain needs to reconstruct the memory from different locations and piece it back together to attempt to get the gist or meaning of what they saw. This is basic cognitive science and it is fascinating. But sometimes, lacking more concrete evidence like dna or hard copy evidence, eye witness is the best we can do, given the source is credible and of sound mind...
No doubt...
I choose not...
Neither do yours...
Still got it...
Been there, done that. I am less convinced after seeing the testimony...
I don't think you're the only one, either...
It is also possible that they are working with dragons and werewolves, but I doubt that, too. I'm such a doubter...
No, it isn't...
I understand. But that isn't honest or true...
Yes, it's unfortunate when it has to come to that...
Sure -
https://www.rollitup.org/spirituality-sexuality-philosophy/794678-i-saw-spiritual-alien-now.html - Post #38 when mudminer pointed out your dishonesty, and your subsequent admission. I love written forums...
You can't prove you haven't...
LOL! How would you know?
It is very common. It would be difficult to find someone who didn't have
any. It's just the way the mind works sometimes...
Here's a more realistic solution, George: why not put on your big boy pants and ask mommy for a $100 loan. That way you could purchase a video camera and post YT links for us here...
Strange then that you haven't demonstrated it once in all that time...
One can assume that, but that wouldn't get them any closer to the truth of the matter...
Or Smurfs. Smurfs are supposed to be good at making things...
The loan from mom and camera idea is better...
I've stated several times that neither you, nor I, know what you are seeing. I am merely pointed out more likely explanations than yours. You really like those strawmen...
Or think you have seen...
Get that camera, George. Then we'll see who's full of shit...
But you have, see link above...