"global warming petition project" peer reviewed and everything???

canndo

Well-Known Member
LULZ, How naive are you canndo, you are owned by the biggest most corrupt PR in the world. and are mindless to the fact.

oh don't tell me, the big bad government that can barely come up with cogent public service announcements is fouling my mind while yours is clear and unspoiled even though billions a year are spent by private industry to have you believe exactly, phrase for phrase as you do. Rarely, if ever do your ideas part ways with those who pay the big bucks to have you echo their various chants.

tell me if
you would, how your opinion differs from how that vast machine would have you believe.
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
Well there ya go, neener neener; I'm not a "conservative" but big money is vastly different from unlimited funds that seem to dupe the left, quite easily.

What has big tobacco got funding wise compared to the federal government in collusion with the Fed?
What makes you think the federal government has not incentive to keep people smoking?
Are you feeling OK?
you don't think that it is in big business's interest to have you believe that it is all and always government's fault? Tell me, just how big is the u.s. Pr budget?
 

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
What's great about science is it has the power to make accurate predictions...

"...we notice a clear tendency in our model for greater than average warming in the southeast United States and the Midwest. ... we conclude that there is evidence that the greenhouse effect increases the liklihood of heat wave drought situations in the southeast and Midwest United States. If our model is approximately correct, such situation may be more common in the next 10 to 15 years than they were in the period between 1950 and 1980."


-James Hansen (June 23, 1988 )
This past summer it almost felt like it never stopped raining.
 

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
oh don't tell me, the big bad government that can barely come up with cogent public service announcements is fouling my mind while yours is clear and unspoiled even though billions a year are spent by private industry to have you believe exactly, phrase for phrase as you do. Rarely, if ever do your ideas part ways with those who pay the big bucks to have you echo their various chants.

tell me if
you would, how your opinion differs from how that vast machine would have you believe.
You my friend, make it a habit of dodging direct questions by asking questions.
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
You my friend, make it a habit of dodging direct questions by asking questions.

And you don't answer them at all. How about answering two, "how does your opinion differ from how big business would have you believe, and


Do you believe in requireing ID in order to vote?
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
ya mean those climate models that you refuse to cite because your talking points don't correspond to reality in any way whatsoever?

cool story bro.

i hear the anti-climate changers are winning 54-40. they're just oversampling real scientists.

you're so SMART.

now hang my damn curtains please.
No reason to cite a specific model. EVERY single one of them that forecast doom and gloom (which is virtually ALL of them) have been wrong. Inflated temperature increases that haven't come to pass. Admissions that negative consequences are likely 30-50 years further off than claimed. Yeah, it's a fucking nightmare for your side of the argument. But, keep telling us how ALL the scientists agree and how the debate is over. We'll just keep ignoring you and churning out the sweet, sweet fumes of our internal combustion engines. Just like you and the hypocritical ilk like you will do as well.

Time to find a new manufactured "cause" to champion.

Sorry, still no curtains. I can do shutters, if you got the scratch. $24/sq ft installed. Average window 15 sq ft works out to about $360 per window. Average home 17 windows comes out to about $6,000 plus tax. Will that be cash or charge? I don't think I would accept a personal check from the likes of you.
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
And you don't answer them at all. How about answering two, "how does your opinion differ from how big business would have you believe, and


Do you believe in requireing ID in order to vote?
"LULZ, How naive are you canndo, you are owned by the biggest most corrupt PR in the world. and are mindless to the fact."


I don't see a question here Jah.




"
 

Sand4x105

Well-Known Member
Stating the fact that most people over 40 in the US don't accept valid scientific theories like evolution and climate change isn't "making fun" of anyone, you're confused..
This is quoted post 69...
Yes, but I'll bet you there are no peeps over 40 that still believe the sun revolves around the earth...
Those idiots are all on you...
20 years ago there was 5-7% that didn't know earth went round the sun...
Now with all you youngsters bringing down the nations IQ...
20 years later 25% believe the sun goes round the earth...
Stupid youngsters... LMAO...
If this keeps up:
In another 20 years... 1/2 the peeps will not know which circles which...
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
Well you just got a first class seat to the ignore list.

Dude wasn't even rude, but you are.
Kp constantly uses back handed critiques and tries too hard to hide the fact he's nothing more than a shill with commie opinions. No one owes anyone the priveledge of not being rude. If someone wants to confront you, they do so at their own risk. Why does it matter if someone pretends to be nice? Just as long as the person doesn't falsify the person's stance.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
you don't think that it is in big business's interest to have you believe that it is all and always government's fault? Tell me, just how big is the u.s. Pr budget?
How big is the us pr budget?
Saw a navy commercial the other day...how much is an aircraft carrier
And the heli used to get the shot?

Now let's add that to climate research budget...all overhead including salaries.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
No reason to cite a specific model. EVERY single one of them that forecast doom and gloom (which is virtually ALL of them) have been wrong. Inflated temperature increases that haven't come to pass. Admissions that negative consequences are likely 30-50 years further off than claimed. Yeah, it's a fucking nightmare for your side of the argument. But, keep telling us how ALL the scientists agree and how the debate is over. We'll just keep ignoring you and churning out the sweet, sweet fumes of our internal combustion engines. Just like you and the hypocritical ilk like you will do as well.

Time to find a new manufactured "cause" to champion.

Sorry, still no curtains. I can do shutters, if you got the scratch. $24/sq ft installed. Average window 15 sq ft works out to about $360 per window. Average home 17 windows comes out to about $6,000 plus tax. Will that be cash or charge? I don't think I would accept a personal check from the likes of you.
if the climate models were really that far off, you would have no problem citing them.

instead, it has been months and you remain steadfast in your refusal to cite them, because you are so wrong. just like when you were off by 18 full points in your prediction of the presidential race.

remember that? how you called it 54-40, but it ended up being 47-51 instead? yeah, that's how dumb you are.





look at how accurate these motherfuckers were even 30 years ago.



woooooooops.
 

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
Show me the irrefutable proof that man has a substantial impact on global warming, prove to me that there aren't other scientists who disagree.
Then you can be my guest to call it fact.
You proved my point with your very post. You inherited your viewpoint from the GCC. Or have you ever wondered if your ideas were your own or if they were seeded by a very good PR organization. I will say this interesting thing yet again - there was no proven causality between tobacco smoking and lung cancer until 1996.
No answer, no proof, nothing but how i proved your point, very weak.

oh don't tell me, the big bad government that can barely come up with cogent public service announcements is fouling my mind while yours is clear and unspoiled even though billions a year are spent by private industry to have you believe exactly, phrase for phrase as you do. Rarely, if ever do your ideas part ways with those who pay the big bucks to have you echo their various chants.

tell me if
you would, how your opinion differs from how that vast machine would have you believe.
And like clockwork, here's one of canndo's questions.

And you don't answer them at all. How about answering two, "how does your opinion differ from how big business would have you believe, and


Do you believe in requireing ID in order to vote?
And another.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
There is nothing you would accept as proof. I can prove to you blue is blue all day long, doesn't change anything in your mind if you won't accept it.

What would you accept as proof?
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Stating the fact that most people over 40 in the US don't accept valid scientific theories like evolution and climate change
Most people over 40?

Citation needed or its all made up. You stated that it was fact, facts are provable, prove it.

Are you MSU?
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
if the climate models were really that far off, you would have no problem citing them.

instead, it has been months and you remain steadfast in your refusal to cite them, because you are so wrong. just like when you were off by 18 full points in your prediction of the presidential race.

remember that? how you called it 54-40, but it ended up being 47-51 instead? yeah, that's how dumb you are.





look at how accurate these motherfuckers were even 30 years ago.



woooooooops.
If the globe was warming, wouldn't we have less ice?
Just sayin.
 
Top