Is this true?

Doer

Well-Known Member
But, it isn't. They said they used a dye. They implied that. What you are watching, is the spread of that dye? But, no. Just an animation, they control.

Also, the vid is something that was produced immediately after the event. Measurements are not showing that kind of spread, I don't think.
 

Cascadian

Well-Known Member
The waste is suspended above ground in a structure that has fractures in it and is bowed out on the side. It is highly unstable.
If there were another quake that caused it to collapse it would be at least 50 times as much radiation as Chernobyl. That is if other reactors and waste storage buildings are not also compromised.

The radiation and fallout could be carried on the jet stream straight to North America.

Finger on the trigger for an Australian Visa...

Edit: I agree it is not a real animation and Doer's is the most likely explanation.
 

keysareme

Well-Known Member
It's in the water. It's flowing to all the planet, best we can do is stay out of the water and keep anything from the ocean out of our bodies and life.

We have three years.
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
Not real, the dynamics are not evident after the ocean is filled from shore to shore, there are all sorts of currents that would mix and intermix levels of radiation all throughout the ocean. I think many of the particulates will sink and cause problems in a slower way. It is said that millions had their lives shortened in the above ground testing years - but there was never any causality. This, I believe will be the same - shortened lifespans for the people in the region and then, later, for those who eat from that region. Maybe Monsanto can make a radiation proof fish.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
[youtube]j7UQXfN-J4E[/youtube]
no it is not true.

it is as just as reliable as the fake quote in your sig. (that was Mel Gibson PLAYING William Wallace, not the man himself)

but what can one expect from the mind that brought us the valuable information of "HawaiiIsHot dot com" and their awesome pyramid marketing scheme based on fukushima end of days preparedness.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Not real, the dynamics are not evident after the ocean is filled from shore to shore, there are all sorts of currents that would mix and intermix levels of radiation all throughout the ocean. I think many of the particulates will sink and cause problems in a slower way. It is said that millions had their lives shortened in the above ground testing years - but there was never any causality. This, I believe will be the same - shortened lifespans for the people in the region and then, later, for those who eat from that region. Maybe Monsanto can make a radiation proof fish.
The Simpsons already did it.

 

overvolt

New Member
People, the end of the world is nigh, there are excessive amounts of Iodine-131, Cesium-137 and Strontium-90flowing into the orientation every day, I say excessive amounts... I'm talking huge amounts, enough to have reached all the western cast of America in the northern hemisphere.

Strontium-90’s half-life is around 29 years. It mimics calcium and goes to our bones.




Iodine-131, for example, can be ingested into the thyroid, where it emits beta particles (electrons) that damage tissue. A plague of damaged thyroids has already been reported among as many as 40 percent of the children in the Fukushima area. That percentage can only go higher. In developing youngsters, it can stunt both physical and mental growth.


Among adults it causes a very wide range of ancillary ailments, including cancer.


Cesium-137 from Fukushima has been found in fish caught as far away as California. It spreads throughout the body, but tends to accumulate in the muscles.

The Japanese government has estimated that approximately 300 tons of highly radioactive water is pouring into the Pacific Ocean from the destroyed Fukushima nuclear facility every single day.
A senior researcher of marine chemistry at the Japan Meteorological Agency’s Meteorological Research Institute says that “30 billion becquerels of radioactive cesium and 30 billion becquerels of radioactive strontium” are being released into the Pacific Ocean from Fukushima every single day.
According to Tepco, a total of somewhere between 20 trillion and 40 trillion becquerels of radioactive tritium have gotten into the Pacific Ocean since the Fukushima disaster first began.


And...According to a professor at Tokyo University, 3 gigabecquerels of cesium-137 are flowing into the port at Fukushima Daiichi every single day.



Conditions in the unit 4 pool, 100 feet from the ground, are perilous, and if any two of the rods touch it could cause a nuclear reaction that would be uncontrollable. The radiation emitted from all these rods, if they are not continually cool and kept separate, would require the evacuation of surrounding areas including Tokyo. Because of the radiation at the site the 6,375 rods in the common storage pool could not be continuously cooled; they would fission and all of humanity will be threatened (we are talking anevent over 100 times greater than Chernobyl) for thousands of years.

Take it from me, I'm an electrical chemical engineer that has studied Nuclear fussion and know that the world is on its turn. As we have entererd 2014, we are entering a time when the world is becoming increasingly unstable. The global economy is being shaken, political corruption is seemingly everywhere, evidence of advanced social decay is all around us and the earth itself is starting to groan and crack with increasingly regularity. But the mainstream media continues to insist that everything is going to be just fine... I think not!!!
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
Things are just fine. I found the nuke poisons are not going to be in the orientation, at all. :)

Isn't that just special?

So, we know all that and thanks for the re-cap. Do you have any news? Can you math out the time till the containment must fail, since it must be cooled with seawater that is being heated and poisoned at the same time.

Seems to me this one is a coffin corner on a short fuse. But, what to do? Buy land in the Playa of Argentina?
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
True? not true?

All I know is that the EPA recommends raising the minimum safe level of radiation in drinking water to a level 27,000 times higher than it previously had.


the new EPA guide refers to International Atomic Energy Agency guidelines that suggest intervention is not necessary until drinking water is contaminated with radioactive iodine 131 at a concentration of 81,000 picocuries per liter. This is 27,000 times less stringent than the EPA rule of 3 picocuries per liter.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2013/04/10/epa-draft-stirs-fears-of-radically-relaxed-radiation-guidelines/


[video=youtube;4L6YZ0Xx7uA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4L6YZ0Xx7uA&feature=kp[/video]
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
People, the end of the world is nigh, there are excessive amounts of Iodine-131, Cesium-137 and Strontium-90flowing into the orientation every day, I say excessive amounts... I'm talking huge amounts, enough to have reached all the western cast of America in the northern hemisphere.

Strontium-90’s half-life is around 29 years. It mimics calcium and goes to our bones.




Iodine-131, for example, can be ingested into the thyroid, where it emits beta particles (electrons) that damage tissue. A plague of damaged thyroids has already been reported among as many as 40 percent of the children in the Fukushima area. That percentage can only go higher. In developing youngsters, it can stunt both physical and mental growth.


Among adults it causes a very wide range of ancillary ailments, including cancer.


Cesium-137 from Fukushima has been found in fish caught as far away as California. It spreads throughout the body, but tends to accumulate in the muscles.

The Japanese government has estimated that approximately 300 tons of highly radioactive water is pouring into the Pacific Ocean from the destroyed Fukushima nuclear facility every single day.
A senior researcher of marine chemistry at the Japan Meteorological Agency’s Meteorological Research Institute says that “30 billion becquerels of radioactive cesium and 30 billion becquerels of radioactive strontium” are being released into the Pacific Ocean from Fukushima every single day.
According to Tepco, a total of somewhere between 20 trillion and 40 trillion becquerels of radioactive tritium have gotten into the Pacific Ocean since the Fukushima disaster first began.


And...According to a professor at Tokyo University, 3 gigabecquerels of cesium-137 are flowing into the port at Fukushima Daiichi every single day.



Conditions in the unit 4 pool, 100 feet from the ground, are perilous, and if any two of the rods touch it could cause a nuclear reaction that would be uncontrollable. The radiation emitted from all these rods, if they are not continually cool and kept separate, would require the evacuation of surrounding areas including Tokyo. Because of the radiation at the site the 6,375 rods in the common storage pool could not be continuously cooled; they would fission and all of humanity will be threatened (we are talking anevent over 100 times greater than Chernobyl) for thousands of years.

Take it from me, I'm an electrical chemical engineer that has studied Nuclear fussion and know that the world is on its turn. As we have entererd 2014, we are entering a time when the world is becoming increasingly unstable. The global economy is being shaken, political corruption is seemingly everywhere, evidence of advanced social decay is all around us and the earth itself is starting to groan and crack with increasingly regularity. But the mainstream media continues to insist that everything is going to be just fine... I think not!!!
To provide a sense of scale, this is under one milligram of the isotope. Panic!!
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
How many people can 1 milligram kill?
This becomes "angels on pinheads". Theoretically, and with perfect distribution by a dedicated evil genius with lotsa syringes and a coupla decades to <cough!> kill, thousands.
But as a marine effluent - improbably two, possibly one, probably none.
 
Top