Hey Pro Lifers. Heres a big FU! You damn Freaks!

MidwesternGro

Well-Known Member
I'm pro-life and proud of it. Fuck you pro-murderers.
You know who is the biggest abortionist? Your God is, think about all those miscarried fetuses. I guess God is a murderer according to you. Check-mate, hahah. I guess you think that 30% of American women are murderers since they have abortions. That's not nice, I would even say it is anti-woman. A fetus is not a human, quit cheapening human life.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
You know who is the biggest abortionist? Your God is, think about all those miscarried fetuses. I guess God is a murderer according to you. Check-mate, hahah. I guess you think that 30% of American women are murderers since they have abortions. That's not nice, I would even say it is anti-woman. A fetus is not a human, quit cheapening human life.
I'm an atheist, asshole! This is our only chance. I'm also against capital punishment, against all wars and against murdering animals so you have a tasty treat. Exploiting intelligent life and polluting our planet is wrong. I'm not cheapening human life, because we aren't this wonderful thing. We're a parasitic virus to Gaia.
 

MidwesternGro

Well-Known Member
I'm an atheist, asshole! This is our only chance. I'm also against capital punishment, against all wars and against murdering animals so you have a tasty treat. Exploiting intelligent life and polluting our planet is wrong. I'm not cheapening human life, because we aren't this wonderful thing. We're a parasitic virus to Gaia.
If we are a parasitic virus, then why aren't you pro-abortion?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I'm an atheist, asshole! This is our only chance. I'm also against capital punishment, against all wars and against murdering animals so you have a tasty treat. Exploiting intelligent life and polluting our planet is wrong. I'm not cheapening human life, because we aren't this wonderful thing. We're a parasitic virus to Gaia.
didn't you pray jesus the other night and have a death pact with your wife?
 

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
What would happen to the fetus development in a brain dead woman?

Has there ever been a successful case of it? Seems like something would go wrong.

If baby was 5-6 months along they could of removed baby to incubator. 16 weeks and the fetus is the size of a orange or something..
just soo much room for complications..
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
If we are a parasitic virus, then why aren't you pro-abortion?
Then why am I against wars and capital punishment? Maybe it's because if humans respected life we'd become a symbiotic virus and live in harmony. I meditate on this daily and try to not harm every chance I get. Why are you against intelligent life?
 

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
I thin I read somewhere that 22 weeks is the earliest a fetus can survive outside womb with medical intervention. Weeks 24-28 are much better.
 

MidwesternGro

Well-Known Member
Then why am I against wars and capital punishment? Maybe it's because if humans respected life we'd become a symbiotic virus and live in harmony. I meditate on this daily and try to not harm every chance I get. Why are you against intelligent life?
A fetus isn't intelligent life. Well, at least compared to most people. LOL!
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
A fetus isn't intelligent life. Well, at least compared to most people. LOL!
Must it know calculus and speak the king's English? Should people have a certain IQ before being considered intelligent life? Here's another fact about me that'll blow your mind. I'm a Libertarian against capitalism.
 

racerboy71

bud bootlegger
I thin I read somewhere that 22 weeks is the earliest a fetus can survive outside womb with medical intervention. Weeks 24-28 are much better.
Must it know calculus and speak the king's English? Should people have a certain IQ before being considered intelligent life? Here's another fact about me that'll blow your mind. I'm a Libertarian against capitalism.
imo, no of course not, but if you were to take a fetus outside of it's mother, and it's too young to breath and exist on it's own, is it really, a living breathing thing??

to me, a fetus isn't really considered a life until it's able to fulfill my basic outline above of what a life consists of..
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
imo, no of course not, but if you were to take a fetus outside of it's mother, and it's too young to breath and exist on it's own, is it really, a living breathing thing??

to me, a fetus isn't really considered a life until it's able to fulfill my basic outline above of what a life consists of..
We shouldn't have life support at all according to your definition. Are you a Christian Scientist? I only play one on TV so my kids don't get vaccinated.
 

racerboy71

bud bootlegger
We shouldn't have life support at all according to your definition. Are you a Christian Scientist? I only play one on TV so my kids don't get vaccinated.
yeah, i'm a christian scientist atheist, new group..

and would i really want to be put on life support if they knew there was no coming back to my old self?? umm, no, i'd rather simply be dead..

but come on, how are you going to compare keeping someone who was once a self supporting entity to a group of cells that has never taken one breath on it's own outside of it's host?? it's like apples to oranges imo..
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
yeah, i'm a christian scientist atheist, new group..

and would i really want to be put on life support if they knew there was no coming back to my old self?? umm, no, i'd rather simply be dead..

but come on, how are you going to compare keeping someone who was once a self supporting entity to a group of cells that has never taken one breath on it's own outside of it's host?? it's like apples to oranges imo..
Because that's my twin boys you're comparing.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Except the law kept her on life support against the husband's wishes because of the fetus. So yes, very pro life.
no, the LAW might be pro life, but it has nothing to do with Pro Lifers, its not like they changed the law in the middle of the woman's death just to get a deformed baby out of the deal. Which is exactly how it is being treated. The law was on the books LONG before this incident.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
She smelled of death? So in fact she was decomposing? That is the ONLY way you can smell of death. If she was decomposing then they had already shut the machines off days before.

What do you guys think the smell of death is? some special scent created by the "death gland" or something? I mean holy speculation batman, its decomposing flesh you morons, LOL.
 

kpmarine

Well-Known Member
no, the LAW might be pro life, but it has nothing to do with Pro Lifers, its not like they changed the law in the middle of the woman's death just to get a deformed baby out of the deal. Which is exactly how it is being treated. The law was on the books LONG before this incident.
So the pro-life law has nothing to do with pro-lifers because it was passed prior to the event? When the law was passed does not change the ill effects of this law or who the major support was provided by.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Sothe pro-life law has nothing to do with pro-lifers because it was passed prior to the event? When the law was passed does not change the ill effects of this law.
I didn't realize that all politicians were pro lifers, you should do some more voting for non politicians when voting for your politicians because those are the people making the laws, not the folks with anti abortion picket signs. Seriously, you should move to Texas and make a change once you gain citizenship, maybe you might be the person that can create laws that have no negative secondary effects ever, until then you will just have to live in an imperfect world.

Why is it that so many of you think this law was designed to create such terrible situations, never thinking that it was done with nothing but good intentions. Using the liberal view, good intentions is all you need to defend ANY law, no matter how wrong or how bad. Like the ACA, its a total piece of shit law, we ALL know it, yet some of you still sit on that high horse telling us how good it is because the road was paved with good intentions.
 

beenthere

New Member
imo, no of course not, but if you were to take a fetus outside of it's mother, and it's too young to breath and exist on it's own, is it really, a living breathing thing??

to me, a fetus isn't really considered a life until it's able to fulfill my basic outline above of what a life consists of..
Even if you take a full term, living and breathing baby out of it's mothers womb, it cannot sustain life on it's own.
I guess everyone has their own definition of a living human being. Doctors pronounce us dead when our hearts discontinue to beat or our brains no longer show activity, ironically, both of these functions are detectable in a fetus.

Edit: Thanks Travis
 

kpmarine

Well-Known Member
I didn't realize that all politicians were pro lifers, you should do some more voting for non politicians when voting for your politicians because those are the people making the laws, not the folks with anti abortion picket signs. Seriously, you should move to Texas and make a change once you gain citizenship, maybe you might be the person that can create laws that have no negative secondary effects ever, until then you will just have to live in an imperfect world.

Why is it that so many of you think this law was designed to create such terrible situations, never thinking that it was done with nothing but good intentions. Using the liberal view, good intentions is all you need to defend ANY law, no matter how wrong or how bad. Like the ACA, its a total piece of shit law, we ALL know it, yet some of you still sit on that high horse telling us how good it is because the road was paved with good intentions.
Seeing as this was a law designed to protect a fetus, and given the track record of Texas on pro-life laws. I'd say it's pro-life politicians that made this law, not "every politician". So your diversion is pretty invalid. Also, since when was the support of "every politician" required to pass a law?

This law caused this specific harm intentionally. Stop acting like a law that requires this to happen every time is equatable to a law where this is the outlier. Had that baby been 14 weeks and healthy, and the husband wanted to pull his wife's plug (Per his wife's wishes even.), he would not have been able to pull the plug either. He would have recieved the joy of watching his dead wife grow an enduring memorial to the pain surrounding her months-delayed death.

As far as the ACA, your babble about liberals, and your implication of me being on a high horse: None of that has anything to do with the price of tea in China. Especially when you consider I'm not a liberal.
 
Top