Buck's Bogart: This is illegal

nontheist

Well-Known Member
I want to be the first to point out that all laws are written to target a narrow group of people.

It shall be known on this day forth: All laws are bigoted.

 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I don't believe the majority have an issue with this. They do with sagging.
so we can post racially targeted laws, as long as the majority agree with them?

can we also ban certain speech if more than 50% of people agree it's offensive?

can we skip the right to a trial if more than 50% of people think he's guilty?

can we torture people with cruel and unusual punishment if more than 50% of think he deserves it?

can we ban interracial marriage if more than 50% of people agree it's offensive?

how do you think this nation works?

I will have a business in the next 2 years. 2 actually, one is already in the works. The 2nd part was deleted cause you are an idiot.
does it involve advertising yourself on craigslist sans clothes to gay for pay clients?

You are the only one that sees it this way and I don't even have to read through the whole thread to know that no one else thinks it is. Which technically makes you the racist. so there is that.
so you post links from white supremacy websites to prove that you're right, but i'm the racist?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I want to be the first to point out that all laws are written to target a narrow group of people.

It shall be known on this day forth: All laws are bigoted.


so laws that involve a massive disparity in sentencing for crack rather than cocaine are bigoted against white people?

were jim crow laws also bigoted against white people?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
i am not lying, you posted 100% bogus and false stats from "colorofcrime.com", which is an offshoot of american renaissance (a white supremacy website).

luckily for truth and common sense, you directly contradicted those stats by later posting actual information from wikipedia which absolutely destroyed the claims your white supremacy site made.

you then claimed that you "totally PWNT me" by destroying your own white supremacy claims.

wanna revisit that?
 

SirGreenThumb

Well-Known Member
i am not lying, you posted 100% bogus and false stats from "colorofcrime.com", which is an offshoot of american renaissance (a white supremacy website).

luckily for truth and common sense, you directly contradicted those stats by later posting actual information from wikipedia which absolutely destroyed the claims your white supremacy site made.

you then claimed that you "totally PWNT me" by destroying your own white supremacy claims.

wanna revisit that?
And you're lying again. Like I've told you before, just because you think its so doesn't make it so.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
And you're lying again. Like I've told you before, just because you think its so doesn't make it so.
alright then, let's revisit it.

https://www.rollitup.org/politics/777992-low-iq-yet-again-linked.html

here you are posting "stats" from 'colorofcrime.com', which was founded by the same guy who founded american renaissance, a white supremacy website.

Well this will be easy.
http://colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.html
The Color of Crime
let's examine some of the claims the white supremacists make....

Police and the justice system are not biased against minorities.

The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic.


you then went on to cite wiki, which contradicted the claims from your white supremacy sites.

u like to use wiki as your sources so... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_an..._United_States
you have been owned once again. u gonna say that ur wiki is biased against black ppl now?
fucking dumbass
While there is a correlation between blacks and Hispanics and crime, the data implies a stronger tie between poverty and crime than crime and any racial group, when gender is taken into consideration.[SUP][39][/SUP] The direct correlation between crime and class, when factoring for race alone, is relatively weak. When gender, and familial history are factored, class correlates more strongly with crime than race or ethnicity.[SUP][40][/SUP][SUP][41][/SUP] Studies indicate that areas with low socioeconomic status may have the greatest correlation of crime with young and adult males, regardless of racial composition, though its effect on females is negligible.[SUP][40][/SUP][SUP][41]


Another recent study in 2012 raises a different concern, showing that Hispanics and blacks receive considerably longer sentences for the same or lesser offenses per average than white offenders with equal or greater criminal records.[SUP][28][/SUP][SUP][29][/SUP]
[/SUP]
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
And you're lying again. Like I've told you before, just because you think its so doesn't make it so.
still want to claim that i'm lying?

i just demonstrated how you posted bogus stats from a white supremacy website that were directly contradicted by the wiki stats you later posted.

according to you, the fact that you directly contradicted yourself "owned" me.

most people would say you are simply proving the correlation between low IQ, racism, and conservatism.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
with sagging, you never see any ass. just underwear. you see more at the beach.

but with mom jeans, you can actually see moose knuckle and camel toe. now that's offensive.



let's ban mom jeans.
 

Balke Buds

Member
Not a racist law...an anti-homosexual law.

[video=youtube;pHAKCrDGBJs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHAKCrDGBJs&feature=youtube_gdata_player[/video]
 

mr sunshine

Well-Known Member
alright then, let's revisit it.https://www.rollitup.org/politics/777992-low-iq-yet-again-linked.htmlhere you are posting "stats" from 'colorofcrime.com', which was founded by the same guy who founded american renaissance, a white supremacy website.let's examine some of the claims the white supremacists make....police and the justice system are not biased against minorities.the single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is black and hispanic.you then went on to cite wiki, which contradicted the claims from your white supremacy sites.while there is a correlation between blacks and hispanics and crime, the data implies a stronger tie between poverty and crime than crime and any racial group, when gender is taken into consideration.[sup][39][/sup] the direct correlation between crime and class, when factoring for race alone, is relatively weak. When gender, and familial history are factored, class correlates more strongly with crime than race or ethnicity.[sup][40][/sup][sup][41][/sup] studies indicate that areas with low socioeconomic status may have the greatest correlation of crime with young and adult males, regardless of racial composition, though its effect on females is negligible.[sup][40][/sup][sup][41]another recent study in 2012 raises a different concern, showing that hispanics and blacks receive considerably longer sentences for the same or lesser offenses per average than white offenders with equal or greater criminal records.[sup][28][/sup][sup][29][/sup][/sup]
burn!!!!!!!!
 
Top