i use raw chemicals in parts to feed and i use formulas from many farms across the worls, none ever mentioned silicate, actually i'm not sure how i bounced into it to begin with, but a simple google search shows many silicate products and claims that they improve many things in plants other than stems, like better resistance to disease and pests, and better leaf formation and more. i am not sure what to make from this, i am a bit confused, could i have missed such a vital fert element all these years or is it just another myth? and does Si rise to a high level to become toxicI still don't put silicates in my formulations. If you want to try it, get your hands on some potassium silicate or silicic acid.
The only scientific evidence I've seen in favor of Si is either anecdotal (People claiming stronger stems, which I think is from the K in K2SiO3), or that tests show plants uptake Si. Proof of uptake is not really proof of utility. If there were documents proving a plant could uptake lead or aluminum, would people automatically conclude that plants actually use the lead for something?
There's very little research to back any of it up.
I occasionally use potassium silicate. Some research lead me to the idea that it can improve stem research although it isn't something conclusive, and I would like to do a side by side with clones. Trying to think of a way to take a more scientific approach to its effectiveness. Was thinking one way would be to do cuts in the stems and count/measure cell walls at different points along the stem asking a tension test.
i use raw chemicals in parts to feed and i use formulas from many farms across the worls, none ever mentioned silicate, actually i'm not sure how i bounced into it to begin with, but a simple google search shows many silicate products and claims that they improve many things in plants other than stems, like better resistance to disease and pests, and better leaf formation and more. i am not sure what to make from this, i am a bit confused, could i have missed such a vital fert element all these years or is it just another myth? and does Si rise to a high level to become toxic
A big reason that I believe that Si isn't typically added into other formulas, is because of the PH issues and mixing issues that it presents. Every Si product that I've ever seen will cause your PH to jump up. You also must mix it into the water completely before you add your nutes or it will cause other nutes(calcium mainly I think) to drop out of the nute solution. I've ran Si a few times, but mostly to raise the PH of the solution. I havn't done a side by side, or really noticed any big change in the plants, but it did what I needed it to. I mostly add some when I do a res change now.
I'll ignore the second part as your first was at least constructive. I'd have to check the bottle to see what amount of k is in it. I don't think it's much, and I believe that the solution includes k due to the fertilizer preparation. But that is a good point. I've done clones with it and without it side by side and I observed that those treated needed less support. Again only an observation, not exactly scientific.If you do try a side by side experiment, make sure if you're using potassium silicate to reduce other sources of K to compensate for the added K from the K2SiO3 or the test results will be inconclusive.
Your nutrient calculator should be able to do this easily if you're using raw salts like... Oh wait... Nutrient calculators are for dummies right? I guess you'll just have to do it all by hand.. Oh wait, you can't do that either... Whatever, just guesstimate it and post your results as if they're conclusive.
I'd have to check the bottle to see what amount of k is in it. I don't think it's much, and I believe that the solution includes k due to the fertilizer preparation.
And no, I don't need a calculator, I read my plants. Growing cannabis is not like baking a cake, nor does every strain want the same feeding schedule. I'm sure you've gathered that from experience, no?
The reason it includes K is because it'ones SiO3. The amount of K is proportional to how much K2SiO3 was used. That means that the amount of Si is proportional to the amount of K used. This means if there's lots of Si, there's lot's of K. If there's less Si, there's less K.
Use some common sense. There isn't a reason they add K. potassium silicate simply has K in it. It's really that simple. Don't take it all in at once, your brain might explode.
Just google silicate in plants. There is plenty of researched science on it. The studies aren't hard to find with a little searching. I'm too tired to look for you.