WSJ NEWS ALERT: Christie Knew of Bridge Lane Closures, Former Official's Attorney Say

UncleBuck said:
christie is all you have.

you think rend pawl the racist plagiarist stands a chance?

perhaps ted cruz, the canadian born psycho extremist?

paul ryan? lulzer.

some frothy santorum? dream on.

rubio? he may be thirsty, but he doesn't have what it takes.

you guys are fucked if christie can't recover.
Click to expand...

i've already predicted the "golden age" of clinton dynasty from 2016-2024..nothing is gonna stop her now..and i mean nothing:wink:
 
schuylaar said:
i've already predicted the "golden age" of clinton dynasty from 2016-2024..nothing is gonna stop her now..and i mean nothing:wink:
Click to expand...

only deliberate and prolonged sexual extortion by a female of considerable influence could force me to accept HillDawg as president
 
UncleBuck said:
christie is all you have.

you think rend pawl the racist plagiarist stands a chance?

perhaps ted cruz, the canadian born psycho extremist?

paul ryan? lulzer.

some frothy santorum? dream on.

rubio? he may be thirsty, but he doesn't have what it takes.

you guys are fucked if christie can't recover.
Click to expand...

There isn't one name on this list that I feel comfortable voting for, except Rand and he's got a great deal of work to do if he wants it. I think the chances are slim and none that a Republican gets my vote. If Christie gets the nom, they might as well stand McCain up there again as far as I'm concerned.
 
If Christie's accuser had evidence or knew of evidence about this case why isnt he providing it?? Still waiting on that one..

Oh wait, he wants IMMUNITY.... Yes, the piece of shit after taking the 5th for something he did while getting paid by the taxpayers wants IMMUNITY from prosecution. Fuck him...

I dont believe the guy has anything, I believe he is looking for a way out.
 
NLXSK1 said:
If Christie's accuser had evidence or knew of evidence about this case why isnt he providing it?? Still waiting on that one..

Oh wait, he wants IMMUNITY.... Yes, the piece of shit after taking the 5th for something he did while getting paid by the taxpayers wants IMMUNITY from prosecution. Fuck him...

I dont believe the guy has anything, I believe he is looking for a way out.
Click to expand...

The big thing I noticed was that Wildstein's law said,
"evidence exists". That does not mean they have such evidence to release, just that it exists.
 
Beagler said:
The big thing I noticed was that Wildstein's law said,
"evidence exists". That does not mean they have such evidence to release, just that it exists.
Click to expand...


Yes, well going to the prosecutor and saying... We have no evidence but I want you to give my client immunity anyway doesnt work unless you are related to the prosecutor or having sex with them...
 
NLXSK1 said:
Yes, well going to the prosecutor and saying... We have no evidence but I want you to give my client immunity anyway doesnt work unless you are related to the prosecutor or having sex with them...
Click to expand...

It sure feeds the media that is salivating on a Christie scandal by just saying, "evidence exists".
 
MuyLocoNC said:
There isn't one name on this list that I feel comfortable voting for, except Rand and he's got a great deal of work to do if he wants it. I think the chances are slim and none that a Republican gets my vote. If Christie gets the nom, they might as well stand McCain up there again as far as I'm concerned.
Click to expand...

yet you slept like a baby when you deluded yourself into believing that romney had a 10 point lead?

you guys will say anything at any time. no backbone, no belief system. just blind bleating sheep.
 
NLXSK1 said:
Be careful with predictions or Bucky will follow you around for years if you are wrong. Oh wait, he likes you, NM...
Click to expand...

now all she has to do is bleat about "skewed polls" for months at a time, like you did.

you have no idea what i'm capable of. show me iran's route to the sea.
 
UncleBuck said:
yet you slept like a baby when you deluded yourself into believing that romney had a 10 point lead?

you guys will say anything at any time. no backbone, no belief system. just blind bleating sheep.
Click to expand...

Lol, still trying to use the recently and thoroughly debunked "10 point Romney lead" attack?

How high are you? It doesn't even relate to the statement you quoted. Let's examine just how stupid your line of reasoning actually is, in this case.

From deep inside the mind of a narcissistic OCD sufferer:

Muy, like SEVERAL major pollsters, thought Romney was up by 7 points in late August/early October (which you have no way of disproving, by the way). And because Romney lost in November and since there is no such thing as leads changing hands or front runners losing their momentum, you aren't allowed to voice opposition to the candidates that I say are your only choices. If you do, you have no belief system, no backbone, will say anything and are a blind bleating sheep.
Click to expand...

If there was ANY correlation in the possible inaccuracy of the polls I followed and my lack of support for the candidates you listed, you might not look like an idiot. Unfortunately for you, no such luck.

Your Hannity-like eagerness to vomit out your flaccid attack for the umpteenth time, got the better of you this time.
 
MuyLocoNC said:
Lol, still trying to use the recently and thoroughly debunked "10 point Romney lead" attack?

How high are you? It doesn't even relate to the statement you quoted. Let's examine just how stupid your line of reasoning actually is, in this case.

From deep inside the mind of a narcissistic OCD sufferer:



If there was ANY correlation in the possible inaccuracy of the polls I followed and my lack of support for the candidates you listed, you might not look like an idiot. Unfortunately for you, no such luck.

Your Hannity-like eagerness to vomit out your flaccid attack for the umpteenth time, got the better of you this time.
Click to expand...


except romney was never up by any margin at all. ever.

you took the two or three biggest outliers and ignored the hundreds if not thousands of other polls.

MuyLocoNC said:
Pew Research center has Romney ahead 49-45, it's closer to 54-40. Yup, that sounds about right.
Click to expand...

and here was the reality of the situation if you analyzed the polls with more than one burnt out brain cell, instead of ignoring all but the best romney outliers:

538-thumbnail.jpg


you suck at facts, history, and life.

stick to hanging curtains.
 
UncleBuck said:
except romney was never up by any margin at all. ever.

you took the two or three biggest outliers and ignored the hundreds if not thousands of other polls.



and here was the reality of the situation if you analyzed the polls with more than one burnt out brain cell, instead of ignoring all but the best romney outliers:

538-thumbnail.jpg


you suck at facts, history, and life.

stick to hanging curtains.
Click to expand...

So, a chart from who knows where, analyzing the election proves he didn't have the lead on October 9th (date of the post)?

For your previous attack and your current claim to be valid, I'll need to see concrete evidence (that would be proof) that he wasn't ahead at the precise moment of my claim. Otherwise, you're using "Bucky Extrapolation" to justify your attack, and we all know how ridiculous and inaccurate that tends to be.

Good luck.
 
MuyLocoNC said:
So, a chart from who knows where, analyzing the election proves he didn't have the lead on October 9th (date of the post)?

For your previous attack and your current claim to be valid, I'll need to see concrete evidence (that would be proof) that he wasn't ahead at the precise moment of my claim. Otherwise, you're using "Bucky Extrapolation" to justify your attack, and we all know how ridiculous and inaccurate that tends to be.

Good luck.
Click to expand...

that stupid chart shows the predictions of the election at any given time during the campaign by nate silver, the dude with the impeccable, 100% success record on predicting elections several campaigns running now.

romney was NEVER ahead in the polls. you looked at a few outliers and deluded yourself.

so much for that 14 point win you predicted, only off by 18 points or so. so very close.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top