Trump's Wag the Dog Moment; Syrian chemical attack was a false flag!

ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
... And herr Chumpster Fuhrer fell for it, hook, line and sinker!

Think for just a moment; Bashar Al Assad is WINNING, so why the fuck would he use chemical weapons, especially against civilians?

Answer; he wouldn't; but the rebels, who are desperate for someone to come save them, certainly would, while making sure that footage leaked immediately in order to provoke a brash, impulsive and neophyte leader into premature action. Fucking brilliant.

https://consortiumnews.com/2017/04/07/trumps-wag-the-dog-moment/
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
On CNN now; a video clip that's an obvious propaganda hit piece vilifying the Assad government without providing a shred of evidence for the assertion that Assad attacked the town with chemical weapons.

Nothing in the story adds up.

WTF is going on? The neocons are running wild with this one.

Herr Chumpster Fuhrer is being suckered.

There's word that American intelligence is so pissed that some officers are considering breaking cover to take the truth public.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
... And herr Chumpster Fuhrer fell for it, hook, line and sinker!

Think for just a moment; Bashar Al Assad is WINNING, so why the fuck would he use chemical weapons, especially against civilians?

Answer; he wouldn't; but the rebels, who are desperate for someone to come save them, certainly would, while making sure that footage leaked immediately in order to provoke a brash, impulsive and neophyte leader into premature action. Fucking brilliant.

https://consortiumnews.com/2017/04/07/trumps-wag-the-dog-moment/
Click to expand...
He is the convenient fool.
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
... And herr Chumpster Fuhrer fell for it, hook, line and sinker!

Think for just a moment; Bashar Al Assad is WINNING, so why the fuck would he use chemical weapons, especially against civilians?

Answer; he wouldn't; but the rebels, who are desperate for someone to come save them, certainly would, while making sure that footage leaked immediately in order to provoke a brash, impulsive and neophyte leader into premature action. Fucking brilliant.

https://consortiumnews.com/2017/04/07/trumps-wag-the-dog-moment/
Click to expand...
Trump does things to promote himself. Any consideration of the country or international situation is secondary. This is a perfect example.
 
HAF2

HAF2

Well-Known Member
Isn't there currently an investiagation and 100% conclusive evidence for either side does not yet exist?

All BBC articles put "chemical attack" in quotation marks. But much of what I've read seem to conclude that Syrian government planes did fly over the area at the exact time of the atttack. And that Russia's explanation that their bombs landed on a munitions bunker that must have contained rebel made chemical weapons is scientifically impossible.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/apr/07/unproven-online-theories-doubting-syrian-gas-attac/

For real everyone here thinks this is a false flag attack? Or is this a satirical thread?
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
HAF2 said:
Isn't there currently an investiagation and 100% conclusive evidence for either side does not yet exist?

All BBC articles put "chemical attack" in quotation marks. But much of what I've read seem to conclude that Syrian government planes did fly over the area at the exact time of the atttack. And that Russia's explanation that their bombs landed on a munitions bunker that must have contained rebel made chemical weapons is scientifically impossible.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/apr/07/unproven-online-theories-doubting-syrian-gas-attac/

For real everyone here thinks this is a false flag attack? Or is this a satirical thread?
Click to expand...
It's not satire.

You have to ask yourself with all his strong opinion/comments of the past about not getting involved with Syria, berating Obama administration over the measures he took..what changed his mind..suddenly.

Ask yourself this.

You can fool some of the people some of the time..

This only plays well with the conspiracy, mine all mine set..constantly worried about someone taking something from them; taking advantage and getting over on them..want to know why? Because that's what THEY themselves do to others in life..therefore this is believable.

All TrumPeePee has to do is rinse and repeat and repeat..
 
Last edited:
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
My question is why did the Russians allow 94 Tomahawks to strike a country they're occupying?

They've enough and perfectly adequately equipped StoA missile batteries that could have destroyed the Tomahawks pretty easily, why did not they shoot down the missiles flying towards them? (In what could have been a massive nuclear first strike)

I've no liking for Assad at all (but I think Middle East dictators are a necessary evil for the most part) but why would he shit on his near-victory?

He's almost won and removing him from power wasn't even suggested anymore.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
SneekyNinja said:
My question is why did the Russians allow 94 Tomahawks to strike a country they're occupying?

They've enough and perfectly adequately equipped StoA missile batteries that could have destroyed the Tomahawks pretty easily, why did not they shoot down the missiles flying towards them? (In what could have been a massive nuclear first strike)

I've no liking for Assad at all (but I think Middle East dictators are a necessary evil for the most part) but why would he shit on his near-victory?

He's almost won and removing him from power wasn't even suggested anymore.
Click to expand...
This sums it up pretty well:

tangerinegreen555 said:
April 6 - White House phone call:

Pootin: Hello

Trump: I need an approval ratings bump or we both suffer.

Pootin: I got you elected, I'm kind of busy

Trump: Assad killed little babies. I'm at 35% percent. I'm going to do a Bill Clinton tomahawk strike

Pootin: Wait till tomorrow, I'll send an approved target list

Trump: OK

Pootin: Don't hurt my people or the pee tapes will be everywhere

Trump: OK. I need approval points. Can we kill Assad?

Pootin: Eventually. When I'm through with him

Trump: Can it be my idea?

Pootin: It will be your idea. They're all your ideas, remember?

Trump: Oh, yeah. OK

Pootin: Give me 12 hours for target list and coordinates. I'll locate empty buildings and antique planes. I'll look good for you. You'll be at 50% in no time.

Trump: I love you Poo

Pootin: I know. America is 50% mine. Community property, you know.

Trump: l love you Poo. I want to be like you.

Pootin: Lock up Hillary. She was a bitch to me.

Trump: I love you Poo.

Pootin: I have to go now. Wait for target list. Bye.
Click to expand...
 
Rizlared

Rizlared

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
It's not satire.

You have to ask yourself with all his strong opinion/comments of the past about not getting involved with Syria, berating Obama administration over the measures he took..what changed his mind..suddenly.

Ask yourself this.

You can fool some of the people some of the time..

This only plays well with the conspiracy, mine all mine set..constantly worried about someone taking something from them; taking advantage and getting over on them..want to know why? Because that's what THEY themselves do to others in life..therefore this is believable.

All TrumPeePee has to do is rinse and repeat and repeat..
Click to expand...
I may be misunderstanding this, if so, please elaborate..

are you suggesting that those who believe in 'conspiracy theories' do so as they judge others by their own (devious) standards?

I read it as such and disagree strongly...but i may have misinterpreted your opinion
 
O

oswizzle

Well-Known Member
Only stupid people believe Assad would use chemical weapons ....

Thats a ISIS/Israel/Saudi Arabia/ Turkey way of killing people
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
SneekyNinja said:
My question is why did the Russians allow 94 Tomahawks to strike a country they're occupying?

They've enough and perfectly adequately equipped StoA missile batteries that could have destroyed the Tomahawks pretty easily, why did not they shoot down the missiles flying towards them? (In what could have been a massive nuclear first strike)

I've no liking for Assad at all (but I think Middle East dictators are a necessary evil for the most part) but why would he shit on his near-victory?

He's almost won and removing him from power wasn't even suggested anymore.
Click to expand...
There is a whole lot we don't know. That's about the only fact in this thread.
 
heckler73

heckler73

Well-Known Member
greg nr said:
What is conclusive is that the russians likely knew of the attack well ahead of time. Which means assad knew. The attack was a $200M reality show with no meaningful target and no meaningful damage to assad.

Welcome to reality military tv.
Click to expand...
And now for this commercial message from one of our sponsors,

Do you have a problem with obstinate nations launching missile attacks against your territory? Tomahawks ruining your breakfast routine and increasing your pothole repair budget?
Well, look no further, we have just the kitchen utensil you NEED to get your day back on track to victory!

KRET 2.0...the latest in jamming technology from Mother Россия MIC LLC Inc.

Now you may ask, "how does this differ from KRET 1.0?"
I'm so glad you asked that, Jimmy. You see, KRET 1.0 was made for shock troop advancement in attack operations, and meant to be mounted on helicopters, to create a localized blinding effect on radar defense systems.
But the new and improved, KRET 2.0 makes Iron Dome look like Tin-foil Helmet.
With KRET 2.0, you can now create an "A2/AD bubble" to protect your entire coastline from pesky, military-grade mosquitoes, leaving you free to deal with the hordes of cockroaches already in your "house", unmolested by the hands of Neocon puppets.

But does it really work? Well, Bobby-Bob al Ahmedoodi, don't take my word for it, listen to the words of one of our unhappy "customers":

The US destroyer USS Donald Cook, equipped with Tomahawk cruise missiles entered the neutral waters of the Black Sea on April 10, 2014. The purpose was a demonstration of force and intimidation in connection with the position of Russia in Ukraine and Crimea. The appearance of American warships in these waters is in contradiction of the Montreux Convention about the nature and duration of stay in the Black Sea by the military ships of countries not washed by this sea. In response, Russia sent an unarmed bomber Su- 24 to fly around the U.S. destroyer. However, experts say that this plane was equipped with the latest Russian electronic warfare complex. According to this version, Aegis spotted from afar the approaching aircraft, and sounded alarm. Everything went normally, and the American radars calculated the speed of the approaching target. But suddenly all the screens went blank. Aegis was not working any more, and the rockets could not get target information. Meanwhile, Su-24 flew over the deck of the destroyer, did battle turn and simulated a missile attack on the target. Then it turned and repeated the maneuver. And did so 12 times.

So...what are you waiting for? Pick up the NATO Hotline, and call immediately. Call in the next 15 minutes, and you'll receive a free BUK AA missile launcher with your order, but don't delay...stocks are limited, and you know we can't do this all day.

BUY...

NOW!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top