Hawk
Well-Known Member
Hi. First post here. Never grown a thing in my life. Been reading a lot....but hope I don't get laughed/yelled at for dumb questions. Great resource here. Anywho....
Is there such a thing as going overboard on lights? I don't want the cost or complexity of light capacity I don't need. I'm only interested in growing with 4 or 5 (maybe 6 max) square feet of space. I've got 5 and 1/2 feet of height to work with. Maybe I could arrange for more height if there's a compelling reason to do so. I'm thinking 2 or 3 plants?
Going the CFL route attracted me at first--low heat, seemingly lower startup cost, seemingly lower energy cost. Just seems easier. Now I'm not so sure. Seems like by the time you've got 2 or 3 150 watt'ers in a setup like this:
...you might as well just go with a sodium/halide convertible setup.
I saw these "kits" and began to wonder about them being a better choice than CFLs.
ORGANIC GROW KIT 400 watt 400w HPS+MH w LIGHT NO SOIL - eBay (item 180117968627 end time May-09-08 12:29:43 PDT)
But do I need 400w of HID light to meet my goals (hobby grower that could loose interest after a while)? And do I need/want all that extra stuff? Any reason to piece together the ancillary equipment separately? Here's the same light without the extras--just the light:
400 watt SWITCHABLE GROW LIGHT w HPS Sodium + MH Halide - eBay (item 160226253586 end time Apr-22-08 12:00:00 PDT)
Is 400w of HID more than I need? Is there any reason a 250w HID light would be better for me than 400w? It doesn't cost any less from this source so more is better, right?
250 watt GROW LIGHT Both SODIUM HPS + HALIDE MH 250w w - eBay (item 180121775189 end time May-17-08 09:03:21 PDT)
Is a convertible sodium/halide system smart? Should I just go for a straight-up halide light and use it for the whole life-cycle?
Help me figure out what the hell I'm doing before I make a decision I'll soon regret. I don't want to spend money on a setup that doesn't work well and leads me to cut my losses and walk away from the whole idea.
Thanks!
Is there such a thing as going overboard on lights? I don't want the cost or complexity of light capacity I don't need. I'm only interested in growing with 4 or 5 (maybe 6 max) square feet of space. I've got 5 and 1/2 feet of height to work with. Maybe I could arrange for more height if there's a compelling reason to do so. I'm thinking 2 or 3 plants?
Going the CFL route attracted me at first--low heat, seemingly lower startup cost, seemingly lower energy cost. Just seems easier. Now I'm not so sure. Seems like by the time you've got 2 or 3 150 watt'ers in a setup like this:
...you might as well just go with a sodium/halide convertible setup.
I saw these "kits" and began to wonder about them being a better choice than CFLs.
ORGANIC GROW KIT 400 watt 400w HPS+MH w LIGHT NO SOIL - eBay (item 180117968627 end time May-09-08 12:29:43 PDT)
But do I need 400w of HID light to meet my goals (hobby grower that could loose interest after a while)? And do I need/want all that extra stuff? Any reason to piece together the ancillary equipment separately? Here's the same light without the extras--just the light:
400 watt SWITCHABLE GROW LIGHT w HPS Sodium + MH Halide - eBay (item 160226253586 end time Apr-22-08 12:00:00 PDT)
Is 400w of HID more than I need? Is there any reason a 250w HID light would be better for me than 400w? It doesn't cost any less from this source so more is better, right?
250 watt GROW LIGHT Both SODIUM HPS + HALIDE MH 250w w - eBay (item 180121775189 end time May-17-08 09:03:21 PDT)
Is a convertible sodium/halide system smart? Should I just go for a straight-up halide light and use it for the whole life-cycle?
Help me figure out what the hell I'm doing before I make a decision I'll soon regret. I don't want to spend money on a setup that doesn't work well and leads me to cut my losses and walk away from the whole idea.
Thanks!