Tired of this question..

"whats the best lighting cycle, and if 24/0 is so much better than 18/6, would it hurt to have them on 18/6, b/c essentially you would save money on the elecrtic bill?"

Well.. let's take a look, and ill try ot break it down.

This is the first example that runs through my head when others ask this repetitive question.

Basically, 24/0 oppose to 18/6 is like a bodybuilder taking zero supplements, and eating RIGHT vs. a bodybuidler eating right and taking anabolics, there is no comparisson in growth and size. The plant will grow up to 33% faster if on 24/0 opposed to 18/6, and if u go lower, you are wasting; time, money, supplies, etc.

That being said, the bill will be the same in the long run due to the incerase in veg time, and there have been cases where is has shown that plants acutally will gain a vast ammount of momentum geared towards vegging if on 24/0, rahter than 18/6.

I hoped this helped, atleast someone from spamming the forums and wasting space on the creation of a new thread.

You really think that the thread title is going to get people to come in here to learn about lighting cycles?
The title is so vague dude, you should at least put something relating to the thread in the title
I could name 50 questions I am tired of hearing....

Ed rosenthal says that given the cost of everything to create the bud the 24/0 light cycle is more efficient to create the bud and better for the bud creator.

you obviously have no knowledge of bodybuilding whatsoever. That was the worst analogy i`ve ever seen. Watch more House before trying again

Skunkman do you have any pics of your plants at lets say two weeks of veg under 24/0?
I would love to compare to my two week old pics to your 24/0 plants at 2 weeks