Quality Testing Costs for LP

AS I get farther into trying to become a Licensed Producer. I contacted a few companies that will be doing quality testing for the new MMPR. One says they rent the quality testing equipment for about $5000 a month ouch. You can kiss a small grow op good bye.

...company was QuantaCann guess they will be doing most of the quality control for the new LP's

5000 thats a lot....sucks man

Awe man that does suck.....Will anyone be able to do the testing than or will you still need a "qualified" person to run the tests?

R.Raider said:

Awe man that does suck.....Will anyone be able to do the testing than or will you still need a "qualified" person to run the tests?

Click to expand...

Anyone that holds a license...and knows how to use the equipment.

redi jedi said:

Anyone that holds a license...and knows how to use the equipment.

Click to expand...

Good to know, thx redi. So it does super suck about the 5g's a month but at least that's one less employee that needs to be hired.

Oh you still need to hire someone for QA, you just dont need to build a lab.

Well that sucks lol. So the LP couldn't be considered the QA if they knew how to run the testing machine?

the lab that i contacted says 5000 is the rental price per month . that is for unlimited testing and to have the machine onsite they must train you to use it. It looks pretty idiot proof. Health Canada says ever batch that comes down needs to be tested. So i dont know what the company would charge just for one test.

R.Raider said:

Well that sucks lol. So the LP couldn't be considered the QA if they knew how to run the testing machine?

Click to expand...

No the LP must have a QA person. If the LP had the equipment and the QA has the know how, then the testing could be done at the LP's site

redi jedi said:

No the LP must have a QA person. If the LP had the equipment and the QA has the know how, then the testing could be done at the LP's site

Click to expand...

So what if instead of renting the machine you sent samples to QuantaCann for testing, would you still need to hire a person for QA?

Yes you still need QA.

redi jedi said:

Yes you still need QA.

Click to expand...

What would you need them for than? Doesn't the testing machine do all the work?...Thx again for the info though redi, I really appreciate this being cleared up for me.

lol..yeah their kinda redundant but the regs say thats what required.

redi jedi said:

lol..yeah their kinda redundant but the regs say thats what required.

Click to expand...

Would be interesting to hear what HC's reasoning would be. Maybe I should I send them a email.

Well the QA has to determine if the product is fit for sale. So once they give it the nod, it can be sold even if the lab work hasn't been done yet. The QA also has to write a report to Health Canada to verify the LP's methods, building and equipment comply with section 4 of the regs.

redi jedi said:

Well the QA has to determine if the product is fit for sale. So once they give it the nod, it can be sold even if the lab work hasn't been done yet. The QA also has to write a report to Health Canada to verify the LP's methods, building and equipment comply with section 4 of the regs.

Click to expand...

Ok think I'm starting to understand. So the testing machine would basically be for testing CBD, THC and etc. levels but the QA person checks for things like mold and etc.?

Yep you got it

Sounds like it wouldn't be a bad idea for some LP's that are in driving distance of each other to get together and split the costs on these testing units.

I don't know, guess it would depend on what it would cost to have the testing done versus renting/buying the equipment and having your QA do it.

Roll it up, light it up, smoke it up. QA done that took like 5 minutes.