Crow River
Well-Known Member
Hey folks. As the outdoor growing season draws to a close, I'm seeing first hand that only the toughest full season strains make it this far. Alas at my latitude (56ºN) the night temperatures and hours of daylight are both getting low. Plants are almost in stasis, healthy but not growing. Whereas fast and early versions mostly managed to finish, if they weren't taken by rot.
I'm thinking to make fast versions of the two toughest strains, retaining the hardiness but hopefully bringing flowering onset forward a month or so. Then they might finish before dormant torpor sets in.
I also have auto flowering versions of each strain from the same breeders. So, of course I thought it might be easiest to cross these with the full season photoperiod from the same strain. But I wonder if that may create issues, as it's kind of a partial back cross too? So the resulting cross may lack "hybrid vigour".
Alternatively I could cross to a hardy autoflower that I've grown and tested at this latitude. I can think of several candidates.
So I wanted to ask for views on this. Is one approach preferable to another? Or should I try both? And then maybe cross those two hybrids to each other?
I'm thinking to make fast versions of the two toughest strains, retaining the hardiness but hopefully bringing flowering onset forward a month or so. Then they might finish before dormant torpor sets in.
I also have auto flowering versions of each strain from the same breeders. So, of course I thought it might be easiest to cross these with the full season photoperiod from the same strain. But I wonder if that may create issues, as it's kind of a partial back cross too? So the resulting cross may lack "hybrid vigour".
Alternatively I could cross to a hardy autoflower that I've grown and tested at this latitude. I can think of several candidates.
So I wanted to ask for views on this. Is one approach preferable to another? Or should I try both? And then maybe cross those two hybrids to each other?