lumatek or quantum E-ballast

best product in E-ballast


  • Total voters
    108

desert fox

Well-Known Member
I went to the hydro store today to make some upgrades. I was talking with the guys and lumatek is supposed to release a dimmable ballast similar to to the quantum. They hand out free catalogs an I turn to page 11 of "Urban Gardener" issue 005 June/July and there she is in a full page ad!!!!!!:hump:

I have never really jumped on the E-ballast bandwagon. I still like the good old faithful magnetics, but the capability to switch lighting output has me very interested indeed. I guess mainly because it gives me better control. Granted I would still be running at 100% most of the time, but if you should run into an issue with height, heat, or leaving for a long weekend where your girls would be very thirsty. It nice to think that you can control it with the flip of a switch.

The Lumatek will be available in 400,600, and 1000w. Power settings switch is similar to quantums. Running at 25% 50% 100% and setting called supper lumens supposivly overdriving your bulb at 110%

Quantum only has the 600 and 1000 out right now. They run at 25% 50% and 100% I am sure they will be releasing a 400 soon enough.

Ok now lets discuss or at least make a vote for who is a better company in the E-ballast world.:hump:
 

nickbbad

New Member
Ive heard people complain much more about quantum then lumatek. Quantum has a fan in it which helps keep it cool but from what I have heard has a tendency to break or get loose and rattle loud. Lumatek don't have fans so they are hotter but from what I have heard have less of a chance of breaking down. Just my 2 cents.
 

desert fox

Well-Known Member
you make a good point. If the fan breaks your ballast will over heat. In the picture the lumateks look just like the standard ballast that they make. They just added the dial.
 

kovenant

Member
Hi, I'm not a regular here - in fact I signed up just to post to this thread. ICmag is my old stomping ground. Anyway, I too was considering the quantum 1000w ballasts because of their dimmability, and when I typed Lumatek vs Quantum into google, this was the only thread I found on the first page (didnt need to look further once I read this one.)

I'm glad I did. I made me then run a search on the Lumatek dimmable ballasts, just released. I currently use six 600w lumatek's on adjust-a-wings (3600w), and I have been contemplating switching to three 1000w quantums or lumateks (3000w) due to the fact that a 1000w lamp on a large adjust-a-wing is recommended for covering a 5'x7.5' area. I grow soil/coco in pots that fit a 3'x6' tray - and replacing the two 600s that currently supply light to each tray with one 1000 is appealing to me. Infact, I would be using it to cover slightly less area than they recommend (which means more lumens per sq.ft.)

Back to the subject, sorry - wanted to give background. So the result of my 2nd search lead me to lumatek, and information about their new ballasts. One of the appeals of the dimmable ballasts was the ability to dim to 600w and save power consumption during that event (early veg under 600s - cutting down on power bill.)

This is what I read from lumatek about their ballasts:

Lumatek™ Electronic Ballasts


  • More lumens generated per watt of electricity consumed - Lumatek™ ballasts have increased efficiency over magnetic ballasts. They lose fewer watts from the power supply to the lamp. This is a power factor of 95%+. The high frequency output results in low power loss
  • Fast start-up - they reach full brightness quickly
  • Completely silent
  • Small compact design
  • Produce less heat
  • Cut-off circuitry - cut off when a short is detected. For ultimate safety
  • Fully interchangeable - Lumatek™ ballasts can light both HPS and MH bulbs (excluding the 750W which is HPS only)
  • NEW - A dimming knob has been added which will allow them to be set at 50/75/100% (only reduce the amount of light not the power usage).

So that was an immediate turn off. I then went to the quantum site to see if their ballasts change the power consumption when dimmed... answer in short - I dont believe they do either! This is all that they list about the Quantum 1000s:
Quantum 1000 Watt Dimmable Electronic Ballast

Run at 100%, 75% or 50% power
Strike both Metal Halide and High Pressure Sodium Bulbs
Accepts 120v or 240v (Both cords included)
Allows 50 Hertz to 60 Hertz
Runs 15% cooler than other digital ballasts on the market
Has a Power Factor of 99.9%
The most stable output frequency of any ballast
Higher lumen output than magnetic ballasts
Light weight and care free
3 year no hassle warranty!


Why a Dimmer you ask?

You have a need for a new HID light for your indoor garden and are overwhelmed with the choices! Maybe your standing in your local Grow Shop or browsing one of the many indoor gardening online retailers and have seen too many ballasts with options you’re not familiar with like a dimmer. You ask yourself ”Why do I need a dimmer on my HID grow lights?” There are several uses for a dimming feature that save you both time and money!
Removing or Reducing Excessive Heat, especially on the unusually warm days has been a tricky task to deal with since the inception of indoor gardening! Never again will a 97 degree hot spree send chills down your spine or you in a crazy dash to the local hardware store to find an Air Conditioner only to find they are already out of stock! Simply dim down your Quantum Series Ballast and dramatically reduce heat output by as much as 50%!
Reducing lumen intensity and heat output from the bulb gives you instant control when necessary like while working in your grow area or those extra hot days! No longer a need to sweet under the intense heat or work with sunglasses on when around your garden!
Foliar feeding your plants has become an unbearable task of every grower that usually must be carried out with the execution of a Swiss watch. Your HID light puts out an immense amount of lumens to replicate the suns natural output. For this reason, Dimming allows for earlier foliar feeding (prior to the usual ‘lights out’ practice) without the scare of burning your plants as you can rest assured you have reduced the lumen output to a safe, non burning level. Imagine the security and flexibility you will gain knowing you can apply your crucial foliar brew hours prior to lights out!
Hardening off cuttings and young plants for transplant has been a burden plaguing our passion for indoor gardening for years. Having to switch from fluorescent to low output HID lighting and then to high output HID lighting is a cumbersome and time consuming practice usually consisting of switching out both ballasts and bulbs or moving plants from one area to another. Imaging the convenience of being able to do this with just the twist of a knob. You can now introduce HID lighting in a gentler, stress free environment gradually increasing light intensity over the period of a few days reducing the risk of burn, wasted time and even worse, SHOCK!
Regulating light output to gain ultimate control of plant growth guarantees you a bumper harvest every time, you now have the ability to control light intensity in specific areas of your garden to allow for even plant growth throughout. No more days of asking yourself why you plants are all different sizes, garden looking like a roller coaster? Simply twist the knob and rest assured knowing you have the control!


So, I would really like to know - so I asked. Guess we'll see what they say. Either way, I suppose it's great to have the ability for all the reasons mentioned (even if it doesnt save you money while you have them dimmed.) If the quantum does not save power - then I would have to say that my initial instinct would be to go with the lumateks. They've been great for me.

Sorry so long.
 

OrganicOzarks

Active Member
I have Lumatek, and am happy. The warranty is what has sold me. My last one actually started to pop and smoke one day (you have to keep in mind that everything will one day break) I took it back to the store, and walked out with another one for free. Sold me.
 

Teeg420

Member
yea i would stick to the magentic ballasts, they last longer, if its breaks most likley its a capacitor or ignitor so you can fix it easily. If your digi breaks you have to send it in cause its sealed plus your down a ballast unless your shop is cool and will give you a loner. Mags are half the price of digi's. Unless your carrying or setting up a major op like 16+ kw i would stick with the mags. check out the article in max yield where eye maker of hortilux lamps tests out digis vs mags. Said no significant difference. I do like the idea of the adjustable output for hardening clones and foliar feeding.
 

guappy17

Member
i have only lumatek 1000w's and have not had a single problem with them at all. i am putting in 16 more set ups and was thinking about the quantum ballast for the expansion. i am currently running radiant 8inch hoods and thinking about switching to the raptor 8inch but am undecided about the ballast. if anyone is using the quantum over the lumatek, please tell me why you use the quantum (if it's cause it's cooled i run a small 9inch fan over the top of all of my lumateks). i think lumatek will be the choice unless there is some compelling evidence. hopefully this brings this post back to life.
 

BizarroOH!

Well-Known Member
My 1000w Quantum just fried itself, last night after owning it for 6 months :-(. I hope my local hydro shop will honor the warranty?! The power cord from the ballast to the wall had visible damage where the power chord plugs into the ballast. Unless they give my a free one I will probably switch to Lumatek, or go back to magnetic. The dimming feature is really nice, but a $400 ballast should last for more than 6 months, right? Next time I am going to look for something that is not made in china. :leaf:
 

mr.bond

Well-Known Member
Me personally, I freaking love my Quantum 1000w. Probably the best piece of my garden equipment.

In regards to what this person wrote...
Ive heard people complain much more about quantum then lumatek. Quantum has a fan in it which helps keep it cool but from what I have heard has a tendency to break or get loose and rattle loud. Lumatek don't have fans so they are hotter but from what I have heard have less of a chance of breaking down. Just my 2 cents.
... I heard the opposite (that Lumateks break more than Quantums). Plus, the Quantums have a fan that MAY go out, but it does have a 3-year warranty on it. It's a basic 40mm fan. Also, HEAT can be a huge contributing factor when it comes to ballasts breaking down. I would recommend a Quantum over a Lumatek 10 times out of 10. Cheers mate!
 

stems&seeds

Active Member
I run galaxy's and would highly recommend them to anyone. Some I've been running 24hours for the past 8 mos with no issues whatsoever. I am however running them all on 240v power, so they tend to draw less amps and definitely run cooler. I'm confident they will last longer running on 240 as they run so much cooler.
I run a 600, 1000, and 2 x 1500's, never had a problem with any of them. Ran hortilux, ultrasun, solarmax, etc. with no problems.
 

Mountainfarmer

Well-Known Member
i own 3 1000 watt nextgens. I have owned for 1 year and have replaced one already. If you ask me digital ballasts are inherently unreliable. Just read the threads about digi ballasts and it will soon become evident that they are not reliable. If I could do it again I would buy magnetic. Don't get me wrong, they are awesome when they are working, but when they break it sucks. People will say "oh quantum is the best!" "no lumatek is" fact is they all use the same technology. These companies like C.A.P and the likes don't put enough research and development into their product, so us growers are left with mediocre products that are unreliable.
 

pitbull420

Well-Known Member
I'm in the process of purchasing a new ballast right now and am undecided between Quantum and Lumatek.. I found this site for the Quantum ballasts and light combo http://www.ultralohydro.com/ which offers a 5 year warranty at a great price.. I found the lumatek hear http://www.discount-hydro.com/productdisp.php?pid=435&navid=49 It's a little more for the combo but not much so I guess my question would have to be which is the better ballast for the money... Any help would be appreciated...
 

purrrrple

Well-Known Member
Quantum is the way to go brother!! I've used them all Lumatek, Quantum, Galaxy, GGL, Phantom, NextGen. I love my Quantums and won't go back. Paid $250 for 1000w $150 for 600w from a guy in Florida. Lumateks kept frying my bulbs and i've had several over the years go bad on me. Just my 2c. PM me if you want the hookup on Quantums i'll give you the guys info.
 
Top