Impications of the Hobby Lobby ruling (America's NEW legal System)

Finshaggy

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
So, back in the day, the Supreme court ruled that Native American's could NOT have religious freedom. They ruled that if they let Natives do religious peyote ceremonies, then go to work sober, they would supposedly be "Making every man a law unto himself".

But now, they made a ruling that Religious COMPANIES can make decisions about what their people can and can not put in their body...

So, what if there is a Native American organization that feels like people that work for them should take peyote, even if they are not Natives? Or what if a Marijuana Dispensary has religious convictions that say they should all smoke at work?
 
Last edited:
Finshaggy

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Also, I wrote this when I was thinking about religious Marijuana in Texas. And the Hobby Lobby ruling adds to it.

United States v. Ballard (1944)
Justice William O. Douglas stated:"They may not be put to the proof of their religious doctrines or beliefs."
Meaning, I shouldn't have to prove a damn thing. But I will anyways.

Lemon v. Kurtzman, 91 S. Ct. 2105 (1971)
The rulings made here were violated. The police had no warrant, and therefore no secular purpose. And have entangled themselves in my religion since I was a child at 14 years old.
1) the government action must have a secular purpose;
2) its primary purpose must not be to inhibit or to advance religion;
3) there must be no excessive entanglement between government and religion.

McDaniel v. Paty 1978
They are taking away my fundamental rights.
Life: They wish to take my time
Liberty: They wish to infringe on my religious freedoms, and put me in a cage for loving a flower
The Pursuit of Happiness: Any effort I make with my religion is squashed by authority. And in effect, squashing me.

Church of Lukumi Babalu Ave., Inc. v. Hialeah, 113 S. Ct. 2217 (1993)
They ruled that the religious sacrifice of animals, is no different than hunting. And it is unconstitutional to consider the two different.
If that is true. Why is tobacco, alcohol, nutmeg, tea, coffee, energy drinks and even corn, and wheat (it has food and industrial uses) allowed to be grown and used legally while marijuana is not. This is unconstitutional.

ESA v. Rylander (2001)
We do not even have to define a supreme being, I do connect Shiva when smoking. But that doesn't have to be specified, or important.
 
Last edited:
Finshaggy

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Also,
I don't know how many people here know who the Moores are, but they have things like the Moorish Science Temple and they have been working on separating the Courts Jurisdiction from theirs. And now the court basically just drove that wedge in there for them.
 
theexpress

theexpress

Well-Known Member
Finshaggy said:
Also,
I don't know how many people here know who the Moores are, but they have things like the Moorish Science Temple and they have been working on separating the Courts Jurisdiction from theirs. And now the court basically just drove that wedge in there for them.
Click to expand...
ur a peace of shit... there now i feel better hope u do to....
 
Finshaggy

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Is anyone here a member of the Universal Life Church? Everyone should be. I have been an ordained minister there since I was like 15.
 
Commander Strax

Commander Strax

Well-Known Member
Finshaggy said:
Also,
I don't know how many people here know who the Moores are, but they have things like the Moorish Science Temple and they have been working on separating the Courts Jurisdiction from theirs. And now the court basically just drove that wedge in there for them.
Click to expand...
they thought that Jamal "Skywalker" Walker was a Moore

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top