has obama had enough of the dems?

joepro · Mar 4, 2009

what pork!? said bill maher when talking about 'pork' being inside of the stimulus package on CNN. Clearly bills writers had the day off and bill is just to big of a star to personaly get any facts. Maybe if the troll of HBO wasn't so entangled in banging yet another future traumatized 17 yr old girl like it's a sport, he could have taken the time to read the package himself before looking like a dumb ass. This borderline 5'1 child molestar has a huge following of admirers that takes him at face value.
That's right libs, you have your own rush!
Fuck bill maher :finger:

end rant.

So I was thinking about the position the dems have put obama in.
obama ran on a new gov't and a new way of doing things and will out anyone who misused even a single dollar of the stimulus package.
Clearly, the dems don't mind making potus a two time liar to the american people.
Is it obama who wanted 100s of millions for things like tattoo removal or some study of animal smells? Get it all in while the gettin is good, boys!
I love this one: $200M has been allocated to “design and furnish” the Department of Homeland Security headquarters. The list goes on and on as you know.
I'm happy to read that obama has had enough and Nacy and the rest can go fuck themselfs(I added this part, but I'm sure that's what he's thinking)
I had on idea obama had a little mavrick in him.
http://www.nypost.com/seven/01072009/news/politics/obama_bans_stimulus_package_pork_149013.htm

sinn0304 · Mar 4, 2009

You seem to be consumed by partisanship.. But, overlooking that.. The republicans have almost 50% of the earmarks, and only 40% of the congressman voting on the package.. So, who has more earmarks again? 57 democrats=$677million.. 40 republicans=$669million.. (667/57=11.8 ) that's 11.8million per democrat senator. (669/40=16.7)thats 16.2million per republican senator.

The #1 earmarker in the bill was the Republican Senator from Mississippi. Not a democrat.

Here's Olbermann to explain it to you, since I doubt you'll understand.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjvEwb3HTSY

Where is your evidence?

joepro · Mar 4, 2009

sinn0304 said:
You seem to be consumed by partisanship.. But, overlooking that.. The republicans have almost 50% of the earmarks, and only 40% of the congressman voting on the package.. So, who has more earmarks again? 57 democrats=$677million.. 40 republicans=$669million.. (667/57=11.8 ) that's 11.8million per democrat senator. (669/40=16.7)thats 16.2million per republican senator.

The #1 earmarker in the bill was the Republican Senator from Mississippi. Not a democrat.

Here's Olbermann to explain it to you, since I doubt you'll understand.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjvEwb3HTSY

Where is your evidence?

evidence of what, the dems making obama into a liar? maher doesn't fuck teenage girls?

My post has a tone of partisanship??
So should I blame the people who are not in charge and who obama has ZERO control over?? My post is about obama putting his foot down 'on earmarks' and maher being a troll.
Maybe I need keith oldermann to explain my own post to the both of us.

lol keith oldermann, um the ex jr espn anchor?
Why don't you just give me a TMZ link too. :wall:

I love you, but I'm afraid I'm going to have to kill you.

pool dude · Mar 4, 2009

Ha..ha that Keith o link is hillarous he is oboma's biggest fan boy. And fyi theres no ear marks in the stimulis bill just pure wish list waste. Who would have thunk that politicans would have wasted our money all the more reasons to limit gov. funding and control. No more federalization period its not in our constution!!! p.s. why are watching Olberman he's been grasping at straws since the election I tune in once and while just for a chuckle and all he talks is still about W's term constantley. Why doesnt he speak about the great things comming out of this spending hmmm. Olbermans show is doomed people will get sick of the fanboy shit when inflation grows and the only new jobs are union constrution jobs and as tends to happen in building things get built work done then what job over. I just cant beleave how many people are just fine with the fed spending your money.

medicineman · Mar 4, 2009

pool dude said:
Ha..ha that Keith o link is hillarous he is oboma's biggest fan boy. And fyi theres no ear marks in the stimulis bill just pure wish list waste. Who would have thunk that politicans would have wasted our money all the more reasons to limit gov. funding and control. No more federalization period its not in our constution!!! p.s. why are watching Olberman he's been grasping at straws since the election I tune in once and while just for a chuckle and all he talks is still about W's term constantley. Why doesnt he speak about the great things comming out of this spending hmmm. Olbermans show is doomed people will get sick of the fanboy shit when inflation grows and the only new jobs are union constrution jobs and as tends to happen in building things get built work done then what job over. I just cant beleave how many people are just fine with the fed spending your money.

Uhhh, who was spending it under repuke control? a trillion on the wars and they aren't even over, Plus all the costs of VA care for all the maimed military personel. The current situation was initiated by repukes, no regulations on Wall street and unfettered banking policies put us in the tank for what, 2-8 trillion? As was stated by the previous poster, the repukes had more pork and they are in the minority. I just love it when a repuke Idea hits the wall.

joepro · Mar 4, 2009

medicineman said:
Uhhh, who was spending it under repuke control? a trillion on the wars and they aren't even over, Plus all the costs of VA care for all the maimed military personel.

heres a fucked up reply: that lest the repuks have something to show for a trillion dollar blow-out. :oops:

medicineman · Mar 4, 2009

joepro said:
heres a fucked up reply: that lest the repuks have something to show for a trillion dollar blow-out.

Are you fucking serious??? Geeze, I thought you had some semblance of intelligence, I guess I was sorely mistaken. If you see anything positive in war then I give the fuck up on you.

joepro · Mar 4, 2009

medicineman said:
Are you fucking serious??? Geeze, I thought you had some semblance of intelligence, I guess I was sorely mistaken. If you see anything positive in war then I give the fuck up on you.

who said positive?
use your soap box to come down off our cross, med. You know me better then that , I'm no pro war mouth piece.

what's the arugment here? I did say it was a fucked up reply, but doesn't make it any less true.

please justify a trillion dollars in 7 weeks without a war?(rhetorical Q)
AIG/GM ect ect ect ect they are going to fall, if not now then later.

My math stills might be off, but in 4 yrs were not gona have anything but receipts.

ViRedd · Mar 4, 2009

When Obama signs the trillion-dollar bailout, the economy officially becomes his.

By the way, Med ... any comments on Obama leaving 50,000 troops in Iraq after promising to get them all out in 16 months? How about Obama's 17,000 troop"surge" in Afghanistan, any comment about that? Also, does Obama have an "exit strategy" for Afghanistan ... or a "date certain" to have the troops out of Afghanistan? Your comments, please.

Vi

joepro · Mar 4, 2009

ViRedd said:
When Obama signs the trillion-dollar bailout, the economy officially becomes his.

By the way, Med ... any comments on Obama leaving 50,000 troops in Iraq after promising to get them all out in 16 months? How about Obama's 17,000 troop"surge" in Afghanistan, any comment about that? Also, does Obama have an "exit strategy" for Afghanistan ... or a "date certain" to have the troops out of Afghanistan? Your comments, please.

Vi

oh I guess they do have a war to justify.
clearly mccain would have been a better potus so far.(enters under med skin :lol:

)

ViRedd · Mar 4, 2009

Oh, and that's not to mention the trillions of taxpayer dollars to bail out the corporations that Med hates so vehemently. Hell, AIG is coming back for another 40 billion. Any comments on that, Med?

As far as I know, Halliburton hasn't received a dime in bail out money. bongsmilie

Vi

medicineman · Mar 4, 2009

ViRedd said:
Oh, and that's not to mention the trillions of taxpayer dollars to bail out the corporations that Med hates so vehemently. Hell, AIG is coming back for another 40 billion. Any comments on that, Med?

As far as I know, Halliburton hasn't received a dime in bail out money.

Vi

Yeah here's my comment: Fuck them, let them go bust. Insurance companies are the Devil incarnate, or as you atheists would say, real fucking assholes. Just remember it was Bush's boys that gave them the first and second massive bailouts, no questions asked. As far as Haliburton is concerned, they have made so many billions off the war in Iraq, they could work for free for the next 20 years and still be solvent.

ViRedd · Mar 4, 2009

medicineman said:
Yeah here's my comment: Fuck them, let them go bust. Insurance companies are the Devil incarnate, or as you atheists would say, real fucking assholes. Just remember it was Bush's boys that gave them the first and second massive bailouts, no questions asked. As far as Haliburton is concerned, they have made so many billions off the war in Iraq, they could work for free for the next 20 years and still be solvent.

And Obama signed on to these bailouts, did he not?

And your comments on the 50,000 troops to be left in Iraq? And then your comments on Obama sending American boys into Afghanistan to be slaughtered and sent home in body bags?

Oh, and need I remind you that Bush is out of office ... and this economy is now Mr. Obama's?

Vi

has obama had enough of the dems?

joepro

Well-Known Member

sinn0304

Active Member

joepro

Well-Known Member

pool dude

Active Member

medicineman

New Member

joepro

Well-Known Member

medicineman

New Member

joepro

Well-Known Member

ViRedd

New Member

joepro

Well-Known Member

ViRedd

New Member

medicineman

New Member

ViRedd

New Member