Former IRS Exec Will Testify, Only In Exchange For Immunity

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
[h=2]She's a key figure in the controversy over how the agency treated conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status.
[/h]
WASHINGTON — Former Internal Revenue Service official Lois Lerner will testify about the IRS handling of Tea Party cases only in exchange for an immunity agreement, her lawyer told a congressional committee Wednesday.
Until then, Lerner will not answer questions unless ordered to do so by a federal judge, her attorney said.
The response from attorney William Taylor came the day after the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee ordered Lerner to reappear at a hearing next week. When Lerner appeared before the committee last May, she asserted her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.


She originally attributed the actions to low-level workers in Cincinnati, but those workers have since told congressional investigators that they were acting on orders from Washington.

Lerner retired from the IRS in September.


Taylor said calling Lerner to testify knowing she would invoke the Fifth Amendment "accomplishes nothing and needlessly embarrasses the witness." He said Lerner has received recent death threats, and so recalling her is "not only improper but dangerous."


Last June, the Oversight Committee ruled by a 22-17 vote that Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights by giving an opening statement and answering a question at last May's hearing.


If there's not a smidgen of corruption, as President Obama claimed while on national TV, what is she worried about?
I thought you only asked for immunity from prosecution, to escape criminal liability.
 
personally, i don't buy it..the irs SHOULD look at tea party applications with more scrutiny because the cock brothers funnel illegal campaign donations through these "shell" 501(c)(4)'s.
 
personally, i don't buy it..the irs SHOULD look at tea party applications with more scrutiny because the cock brothers funnel illegal campaign donations through these "shell" 501(c)(4)'s.

Then you also agree that the IRS should exercise more scrutiny for 501's associated with George Soros, right?
 
personally, i don't buy it..the irs SHOULD look at tea party applications with more scrutiny because the cock brothers funnel illegal campaign donations through these "shell" 501(c)(4)'s.

these finance schemes are not illegal, the groups funded are not shell companies and it is not limited to "tea party" groups.

the left is replete with examples of "grass roots" groups that are professional lobying agencies, which are not at all "non profit", funded wholly or in the vast majority by wealthy leftists like drummond pike and george soros.

adjust your skirts, your hypocrisy is showing.
 
these finance schemes are not illegal, the groups funded are not shell companies and it is not limited to "tea party" groups.

the left is replete with examples of "grass roots" groups that are professional lobying agencies, which are not at all "non profit", funded wholly or in the vast majority by wealthy leftists like drummond pike and george soros.

adjust your skirts, your hypocrisy is showing.

God, I hope that's all we see. There is only so much glowing skin stretched over oatmeal-like cellulite that I can stand.
 
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/18/us-usa-irs-teaparty-idUSBRE95H1B520130618

John Shafer, who described himself as "a conservative Republican," told congressional investigators he flagged the first application for tax-exempt status from a Tea Party-aligned group that he and a lower-level agent came across in February 2010 because it was a new, high-profile issue.



Asked if the lower-level agent sought to elevate the case to Washington because he disagreed with Tea Party politics, Shafer said that was not the case.



"We never, never discussed any political, personal aspirations whatsoever," he said, according to a transcript of his testimony reviewed by Reuters on Tuesday.
 
personally, i don't buy it..the irs SHOULD look at tea party applications with more scrutiny because the cock brothers funnel illegal campaign donations through these "shell" 501(c)(4)'s.

Were these shell 501(c)(4)'s whatever they are, exist prior to the tea party or because of it? I'm pretty sure the tea party did not create this thing, maybe the IRS should investigate those who created this thing. Sounds to me like you simply have a biased agenda.
 
Were these shell 501(c)(4)'s whatever they are, exist prior to the tea party or because of it? I'm pretty sure the tea party did not create this thing, maybe the IRS should investigate those who created this thing. Sounds to me like you simply have a biased agenda.

these 501c4 groups used to have to exist EXCLUSIVELY for social welfare purposes, now they must exist PRIMARILY for social welfare purposes.

you think the tea party is interested in social welfare at all?

to quote an newly formed army of uninspired and unoriginal sock puppets: LULZ
 
these 501c4 groups used to have to exist EXCLUSIVELY for social welfare purposes, now they must exist PRIMARILY for social welfare purposes.

you think the tea party is interested in social welfare at all?

to quote an newly formed army of uninspired and unoriginal sock puppets:

So...now you know the meaning of primarily and all the rules of how to determine that??!! .ZLUL
 
Back
Top