REALOGSONLY
Member
#1 strain of OG you have grown or smoked this year and why include effect and terpene profile.
Same here for Tahoe og. Was a bitch to grow and very picky for my newbie assTahoe og is bomb
Fantastic yield and potency.
I believe the cut my buddy ran was from cali connection or something.
Super frosty dont know the terpine details lol
I didnt think louis was an original or maybe it was just came around later. And ghost i thought came later also. But as far as ive heard the sfv, larry and tahoe are the same cut originally grown in different places in different environments by different growers. Ive grown the larry and tahoe clone onlys and theyre almost identical when run in the same setup. I was running ebb n flow at the time so same nute schedule and light and everything pretty much. When og was first around in socal there were none of these prefix names on it. It was just og. Then i remember fire coming around all of this other naming bs is way more recent, i wouldnt be surprised if none of them were the original cut anymore.This is why I haven't been coming to RIU lately. So much misinformation.
First off, chem is not og. Chem is chem.
Chem d, chem 4, chem91 etc
Og is og, the originals. Ghost, SFV (not a cali connection seed) tahoe, Louis, BTY, tk. You have a bunch of renamed cuts. And S1 bag seed. You can't compare a cross to the original.
If you're looking for skunky, look at a cross or hybrid. All og's taste very similar. Skunk but more pinesol.
Funny you say chem isn't an OG when it's in ALL those plants genetics you listed as "original OGs". So actually the original OG is chemdawg since it is the PARENT (MOTHER/FATHER) OF ALL THOSE OGS YOU JUST NAMED. Just look at that SFVOG genetics http://en.seedfinder.eu/strain-info/SFV_OG/Clone_Only_Strains/ it has CHEMDAWG MIXED WITH CHEMDAWG!This is why I haven't been coming to RIU lately. So much misinformation.
First off, chem is not og. Chem is chem.
Chem d, chem 4, chem91 etc
Og is og, the originals. Ghost, SFV (not a cali connection seed) tahoe, Louis, BTY, tk. You have a bunch of renamed cuts. And S1 bag seed. You can't compare a cross to the original.
If you're looking for skunky, look at a cross or hybrid. All og's taste very similar. Skunk but more pinesol.
This is not correct.Funny you say chem isn't an OG when it's in ALL those plants genetics you listed as "original OGs". So actually the original OG is chemdawg since it is the PARENT (MOTHER/FATHER) OF ALL THOSE OGS YOU JUST NAMED. Just look at that SFVOG genetics http://en.seedfinder.eu/strain-info/SFV_OG/Clone_Only_Strains/ it has CHEMDAWG MIXED WITH CHEMDAWG!
How? Just look up the genetic lineage to your plants and you will see you just have chemdawg crosses that someone named "OG".This is not correct.
Sent from my LG-LS980 using Rollitup mobile app
You cant look up the og genetics because nobody truly knows where it comes from and can prove it. Chemdawg is its own strain and is older than og. Theres a stupid story about a greatful dead show and bagseed from chem, but its a story thats all it is. There are a ton of stupid stories about the lineage of og. The only similarity between chem and true og is kind of the structure, but not really. If youve grown out the two strains, which i have, you would know there are massive differences and while it may be possible that chem is in og, nobody knows. And every chrm cross ive run grows jut as vigorous as the original chem and its a massive yielder ime. Taking og geneics seriously from any breeder these days is rediculous. Go look up all the different claims for genetics of bubba or og or white widow or a thousand others.How? Just look up the genetic lineage to your plants and you will see you just have chemdawg crosses that someone named "OG".