Activated carbon works on the same premise as your lungs do. SURFACE AREA.
Right, which is kinda why these had appeal to me. Every time I look at the typical activated carbon scrubber I think about all those little pellets in them. It makes me wonder how much of those pellets actually gets used. In my mind, for every pellet the only effective part is the surface, which constitutes very little of the pellet volume. This in effects adds a whole lot of unnecessary, and unused, weight to the filter.
These "fibers" are apparently like a giant flat sheet of activated carbon that has been corrugated and wrapped around a cone. The premise being that now the only part of the material being exposed is the surface; no more internal volume being wasted.
The question to me is: can they really make activated carbon into a fiber and then weave that into some sort of sheet like they've done here? You may be totally correct that this is just a marketing ploy and that these products have no merit whatsoever; which is why I wanted to see a vote from people who have personally used them.
can fan 33 and a 6" vortex service all my air-filtering needs for a closet grow
I agree that the typical can-type filters work well. I have one in my closet that seems to do the trick. The reason why these appeal to me is mainly their weight, which I believe is around 2 pounds for the 4" model. This would be great because I could hook this up straight to the intake side of my air cooled hood without the need for extra tubing and bends, etc.