polyarcturus
Well-Known Member
Can All Female Cannabis plant produce VIABLE male flowers?
is all cannabis genetically predispositioned to hermaphidism to varying degrees of course?(depending on what conditions it take to make male stamen form from GA to stress.)
and Why?
this is the best paper i could find, its not about cannabis and it explains both theory's about hermaphroditism being both possibly a trait or genetically predisposed.
a lot those answers are stemming from evolutions of dioecious plants from hermaphroditic ones, this would explain the ability for any female to produce male stamen, but this does not mean they will be viable, if their pollen is not viable, then does this make it a true female?
heres the paper you make your own calls
http://www.simonqueenborough.com/uploads/1/0/0/8/1008315/bawa_1980_ares_evolution.dioecy.pdf
so i guess i want to apologize because if the papers are correct that im reading, because if all dioecious plants evolved from hermaphrodite ones, that means all females are technically able to produce male flowers(viable or not), and it is not trait like i had believed, it is ingrained genetically.
does this change much to me or my breeding? no because the amount of predisposition to hermie can be bred to a controllable extent, which still follows along the same path of treating as a trait in a breeding program.
is all cannabis genetically predispositioned to hermaphidism to varying degrees of course?(depending on what conditions it take to make male stamen form from GA to stress.)
and Why?
this is the best paper i could find, its not about cannabis and it explains both theory's about hermaphroditism being both possibly a trait or genetically predisposed.
a lot those answers are stemming from evolutions of dioecious plants from hermaphroditic ones, this would explain the ability for any female to produce male stamen, but this does not mean they will be viable, if their pollen is not viable, then does this make it a true female?
heres the paper you make your own calls
http://www.simonqueenborough.com/uploads/1/0/0/8/1008315/bawa_1980_ares_evolution.dioecy.pdf
so i guess i want to apologize because if the papers are correct that im reading, because if all dioecious plants evolved from hermaphrodite ones, that means all females are technically able to produce male flowers(viable or not), and it is not trait like i had believed, it is ingrained genetically.
does this change much to me or my breeding? no because the amount of predisposition to hermie can be bred to a controllable extent, which still follows along the same path of treating as a trait in a breeding program.