I've been growing in coco with canna nutrients and I'm considering making my own and making changes to my nutrient profile to better match my setup. My setup varies off the normal coco setup in that I use RO water and a 30% perlite 70% coco mix.
I've considered rockwool slabs or clean perlite in the past for nutrient solution and substrate predictability, but I like that coco still retains some soil like qualities in that it binds some nutrients for a smoother delivery over the long term, and as such is more forgiving. Maybe one day i'll make the switch.
I like the canna coco range as its high in NPK and balanced well with the Ca (near 4:5 Ca:N) something that cant be achieved without running to waste and a drip system.
I'm considering formulating my own and tweaking the formula for lower Ca, more like 4.2% (from 4.5%) and upping the Mg to 1.6% (from 1.2%).
The idea is that using the 4:5 Ca:N ratio as a baseline, the reduced coco in my coco-perlite mix means lower Ca binding and thus more Ca available to limit the uptake of everything else, thus lower Ca will boost uptake. The idea with upping the Mg is that it is off the typical 1:2 Mg:Ca ratio and by upping it I'll avoid the need for Mg additives while synergising N and P uptake during veg. I also compensate for the fact that coco will bind some of the Mg. Mg can block K which can be problematic during flower, but I suspect that adding mono-potassium phosphate to the mix will be beneficial. During flower I will drop Mg to 1.2% to prevent higher K from synergising causing Mg burn.
Perhaps i should make a A+B for veg and A+B for flower formula. Both Veg and Bloom, with a Ca of 4.2% and then 1.6% Mg for Veg and then drop to 1.2% Mg for flower with Mono-potassium phosphate.
What you think, am I about to head into problems or is the reasoning sound?
I've considered rockwool slabs or clean perlite in the past for nutrient solution and substrate predictability, but I like that coco still retains some soil like qualities in that it binds some nutrients for a smoother delivery over the long term, and as such is more forgiving. Maybe one day i'll make the switch.
I like the canna coco range as its high in NPK and balanced well with the Ca (near 4:5 Ca:N) something that cant be achieved without running to waste and a drip system.
I'm considering formulating my own and tweaking the formula for lower Ca, more like 4.2% (from 4.5%) and upping the Mg to 1.6% (from 1.2%).
The idea is that using the 4:5 Ca:N ratio as a baseline, the reduced coco in my coco-perlite mix means lower Ca binding and thus more Ca available to limit the uptake of everything else, thus lower Ca will boost uptake. The idea with upping the Mg is that it is off the typical 1:2 Mg:Ca ratio and by upping it I'll avoid the need for Mg additives while synergising N and P uptake during veg. I also compensate for the fact that coco will bind some of the Mg. Mg can block K which can be problematic during flower, but I suspect that adding mono-potassium phosphate to the mix will be beneficial. During flower I will drop Mg to 1.2% to prevent higher K from synergising causing Mg burn.
Perhaps i should make a A+B for veg and A+B for flower formula. Both Veg and Bloom, with a Ca of 4.2% and then 1.6% Mg for Veg and then drop to 1.2% Mg for flower with Mono-potassium phosphate.
What you think, am I about to head into problems or is the reasoning sound?