Search results

I don't know how I missed this gem of a post when I posted about this thread back in April. For some reason a post of mine got liked from this 6 year old thread and I almost spat out my tea reading your post. Top kek @Eraserhead ! :bigjoint:

I deleted the off topic personal attacks. Next time someone posts stuff like this to you, or anyone else, just report it and we'll deal with it, rather than arguing back and forth. Luckily it looks like it didn't derail the topic discussion.

The plant looks nowhere near ready, hardly any receeding pistils, no swollen calyces. There is also sign of rather severe nutrient deficiency, and not just on that single plant. I'd recommend not depriving your plant of nutrients in the most critical stage of flowering, and to check the...

It seems like you didn't care about my previous post. Keep this thread on topic without insulting each other or I will lock the damn thread.

I've come back to this thread after 5 years, to check whether I missed anything, since I left the thread after I had made my points 5 times over, provided all the scientific evidence and had the same discussion 20 times @ about page 20. I'm very happy to see that in the end, the thread...

I'd appreciate it if you guys would stop bickering and throwing around personal insults. I've read through the thread and there has obviously been some issues here, but there is no need for tipping the thread off the scales just because you (vehemently) disagree with each other. To the author...

Yw, glad you found it helpful. No I don't believe in turning off grow lights to 'push out more trichomes' or whatever it is people think happens by doing that. It's an unproven step that makes very little sense. I would obviously change my view if I were presented with proper evidence. Flushing...

I agree that we need more hard data, more science in general and specifically more studies on cannabinoids and their development over time in relation to conversion, oxydation & decarboxylation etc. However, I do believe that we are seeing an increase in these sorts of studies, but since the...

Indeed, and I truly hope that we will see a lot more in depth studies on the complexity of cannabinoids and their development in the future, both in vivo and in vitro. I try to keep up to date on the science, although this specific area is not my speciality. But I do have access to most...

It can indeed be fun to see people stumbling trying to understand a simple statistical analysis. What I find more interesting though, is the fact that a 12% drop in potency, in just 1 month, isn't considered a large drop off in potency by some people in this thread. I'd say that losing 12% of...

Keep your posts relevant to the discussion at hand or the general point of the sticky. Asking stupid questions and then acting like you didn't ask any questions is not pertinent to the discussion we are having here. This thread is not a place for you to act out your personal frustrations.

I don't understand what you asking; my level of confidence in what 'crap' exactly? I feel like you are being sarcastic and making a joke, but I can't be sure, based on the kind of ridiculous logic I've seen on this forum before. :bigjoint:

You are completely misunderstanding, or more likely, misrepresenting what the scientists found in the study. What you just quoted again, is what the average loss in the subsequent years AFTER TWO YEARS of storage is; 7% accumulative. That means that after losing 26.8% THC by being stored for two...

You are quoting the science wrong. Dried plant material loses, on average, 16.6% of THC over a year of storage, according to the study you linked. The 7% you are quoting, which is in fact 7.4%, is the standard deviation, a measure of how much the results deviate from each other. In essence you...

The trichomes look fine in that picture, they look cloudy. If you see this across most of the calyces you can safely harvest, assuming you have checked for all the other signs & criteria of peak harvest. With regards to the leaves, that could be loads of different issues. If you are close to...

The problem with being as vague as you are being is that nobody who has any respect for science understands what you are saying. None of what you have said makes any sense, scientifically or logically. I have no clue what you mean when anyone says "chem and organic". If you had wanted to...

Wether you grow organic or not you are still using chemicals. Nitrogen for example is a chemical element (means the substance has just one type of atoms), and there are many "chemicals" in weed in general, regardless of how you grow. The difference between organic and synthetic is simply...

I warms my heart to see that at least some people have understood the points I've been making for years.