Search results

lol yes you and the other two stooges have made it quite clear (beginning with your first posts here) that this kind of feces hurling is your best and most substantive effort ;)

:weed:

what do the corpsgov and DK and his minion have in common? they show us that as with those who came before us knew, there's no easy way to be free... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4xjr9v5ehk

actually its exactly your involvement in this discussion that continually brings it to "nonsense" DK, and then like cleaning up after a puppy who just keeps crapping on the kitchen floor, I keep coming back with a mop and water bucket trying to teach you to shit out side lol ;)

omg...depressing...welcome to the nanny state deluxe model...soon to come the ultra double deluxe model... we should simply view it as our challenge/responsibility in this time to stand up for the rights of all those who come after us, all those before us knew there's no easy way to be free...

lol anyone who has ever done anything in terms of human rights faces such, but things still get done... the only time things really dont get done is when folks allow themselves to become dependent on folks who think like you do to do things ;)

such would be only true about 'commerce' if you have the human rights as described in the proposal ;)

the county of lake (or as we say 'lake county'), california... we've been under attack by local, state and fed authorities to keep us from growing plants for our own use/needs and we want to put all the reality cards on the table, or at least try...

dude, in law you dont just get a little bit of this or that, law applies equally across the board, so it is exactly your opinion of how things should be that has gotten us into this whole cannabis shenanigans and its unbelievable you cant see that? further, it takes a view point like yours...

man thanks, that's good news, we are still working on the final draft and have delayed filing it with the county until tomorrow. all opinions welcome...

wtf are you talking about? lol the issue is about jurisdictional authority...you need to remove your dunce cap and understand that if you have the jurisdictional authority to outlaw any species then you have the authority to outlaw/regulate any species etc, but i think you know that and that's...

this measure could be easily adapted to work in any state, we are still doing last minute editing, but we have added section 1.(b) and changed section 3. we are hoping to file this today :) so any input you may have would be appreciated, thanks, dna "(Section)1.(b) That any law, to the extent...

need proof readers! still doing last minute editing, but we added section 1.(b) and changed section 3., we are hoping to file this today :) "(Section)1.(b) That any law, to the extent that it would specifically deny or disparage the human rights as described in Section 1. herein is...

we are still doing last minute editing, but we added section 1.(b) and changed section 3., we are hoping to file this today :) "(Section)1.(b) That any law, to the extent that it would specifically deny or disparage the human rights as described in Section 1. herein is unconstitutional by both...

added section 1.(b) and changed section 3., we are hoping to file this today :) "(Section)1.(b) That any law, to the extent that it would specifically deny or disparage the human rights as described in Section 1. herein is unconstitutional by both the Federal Constitutions 9th Amendment and...

good post! thanks :)

thats simply because you apparently have no basic understanding of law...law applies equally across the board, in other words once you allow for the jurisdictional authority to outlaw/regulate any particular plant species, then you have crossed a precedent setting line which implies authority to...

read the fucking proposal you idiot lol...then read the thread...you made your bed here DK...

who wrote that besides you? no one... why are you lying DK? is it necessary to make your 'argument?

no genius, you need to read the thread lol...i know exactly what captain diversion is saying and he is apparently about as bright as you are... ps...the proposal says nothing about cannabis...its about humans needing plants to live... seriously do you even read before you post?