Are we asking the 'right' human question?
Humans are naturally endowed with the fundamental right to cultivate and grow the plants of this earth, and posses the seeds thereof, for their own needs as individuals in pursuit of life and in effort to live, and that such basic human rights exist and are held in perpetuity outside of the constitutional responsibility of government to protect an individuals right to engage in commerce.
Why isn't the 'cannabis' issue simply boiled down to the above statement?
Would we still be arguing about 'legalization/regulation' if every conversation started with the above statement?
If we re-secured the human right referenced above, would commerce rules then not be forced to be developed surrounding the cannabis plant etc?
Are we asking the 'right' human question?