Just to be clear....

B

bde0001

New Member
they are not trying to go after handguns too are they? The whole gun control is only on assault rifles still right?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
no, they're going to take all of your guns and you will have to rely on a spoon to defend yourself. kelly4 said so.
 
drolove

drolove

Well-Known Member
they are going after ALL assault rifles, semi auto rifles AND pistols that can hold over 10 rounds in the mag.
 
nontheist

nontheist

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
so are you saying we should go after other guns instead? or would that be unconstitutional?
Click to expand...
Constitutionality is questioned in both scenarios but at least one makes sense. This is a prime example of half truths and misdirection. A law that will almost have no impact but it gives the idiots something to feel better about.
 
drolove

drolove

Well-Known Member
its not unconstitutional because they arent saying you cant bare arms, they are just saying you cant bare "these" arms. thats almost like complaining about not being able to own grenades or something and saying its unconstitutional.
 
Figong

Figong

Well-Known Member
drolove said:
its not unconstitutional because they arent saying you cant bare arms, they are just saying you cant bare "these" arms. thats almost like complaining about not being able to own grenades or something and saying its unconstitutional.
Click to expand...
Class 3 can own mortars, grenade launchers, missile launchers, and a few other 'dangerous' weapons.. so no, there is no complaint - if you can afford the Class 3, you can buy said items.
 
nontheist

nontheist

Well-Known Member
The only thing that will make it through is stricter background checks and even that's questionable it has been openly said they don't have the votes for assault weapons ban. Its just a song and dance just nod your head and smile liberals need to feel important.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
nontheist said:
Constitutionality is questioned in both scenarios but at least one makes sense. This is a prime example of half truths and misdirection. A law that will almost have no impact but it gives the idiots something to feel better about.
Click to expand...
so the constitution is great when it comes to you keeping your guns but it's bad if it makes a mexican couple's kid an american citizen?

:lol:

by taking the bait, you proved yourself dumber than most fish.
 
nontheist

nontheist

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
so the constitution is great when it comes to you keeping your guns but it's bad if it makes a mexican couple's kid an american citizen?

:lol:

by taking the bait, you proved yourself dumber than most fish.
Click to expand...
...............*nod*

If want to post dumb shit please keep it on the appropriate thread. You are a sore loser
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
bde0001 said:
they are not trying to go after handguns too are they? The whole gun control is only on assault rifles still right?
Click to expand...
Assault rifles were banned long ago. Now they're going after "assault weapons". Tho the term has no legal definition, they are seeking to include any firearm, or any part of a firearm that has any "military" characteristic. You know, a magazine holding more than 30, 20, 10, 8, 7, 3, or 1 rounds (you pick, the number seems to vary), or a removable magazine, or has a trigger, or a handle, or a sight, or a barrel, or uses pre-manufactured ammunition, or just "looks scarey". So yeah, they're coming after your shotgun and pistol. Just give em time.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
Assault rifles were banned long ago. Now they're going after "assault weapons". Tho the term has no legal definition, they are seeking to include any firearm, or any part of a firearm that has any "military" characteristic. You know, a magazine holding more than 30, 20, 10, 8, 7, 3, or 1 rounds (you pick, the number seems to vary), or a removable magazine, or has a trigger, or a handle, or a sight, or a barrel, or uses pre-manufactured ammunition, or just "looks scarey". So yeah, they're coming after your shotgun and pistol. Just give em time.
Click to expand...
no one's talking about confiscating anyone's guns, you liar. any ban would be a ban on future sales.

the sky didn't fall in 1994, and it won't this time if they even manage a ban.
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
drolove said:
its not unconstitutional because they arent saying you cant bare arms, they are just saying you cant bare "these" arms. thats almost like complaining about not being able to own grenades or something and saying its unconstitutional.
Click to expand...
"these" will be just today's restrictions, once they said it was only automatic weapons. Give them an inch, and they will take a mile.
 
nontheist

nontheist

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
Assault rifles were banned long ago. Now they're going after "assault weapons". Tho the term has no legal definition, they are seeking to include any firearm, or any part of a firearm that has any "military" characteristic. You know, a magazine holding more than 30, 20, 10, 8, 7, 3, or 1 rounds (you pick, the number seems to vary), or a removable magazine, or has a trigger, or a handle, or a sight, or a barrel, or uses pre-manufactured ammunition, or just "looks scarey". So yeah, they're coming after your shotgun and pistol. Just give em time.
Click to expand...
Easy red, they're going to try* the likeliness of success is grim. They can't even muster enough democrat votes in the senate and the house is fucking laughing at them for even trying.
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Figong said:
Class 3 can own mortars, grenade launchers, missile launchers, and a few other 'dangerous' weapons.. so no, there is no complaint - if you can afford the Class 3, you can buy said items.
Click to expand...
It's not just the prohibitive fees, you must also be "approved".
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
It's not just the prohibitive fees, you must also be "approved".
Click to expand...
approval is required because we don't want certain weapons in the hands of unstable people who talk about their dead wives and dead kids and 7 year old kids that they would rape and classrooms of college kids that they would kill.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top