Monsanto cannabis yes or no? The DNA Protection Act of 2013

[Ninjabowler]

tell me again about the tomatoes ninajbowler

With Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in bed with Monsanto and Dow—as evidenced in a number of political and economic maneuvers, not least of all the removal of 1 million signatures for a GMO labeling campaign—it’s uncertain how easily the United Stateswill end genetic modification practices. Researchers across the world have already provided ample evidence of GMO’s harmful effects, including weight gain, organ disruption, infertility, tumor development, and the development of resistant weeds and pests. The push for change to natural, organic food and GMO labeling must come from the public.

 

[Ninjabowler]

edited it for you

tell me about the tomatoes again

Proof it was debunked please. Or are you full of shit again?

 

[Ninjabowler]

I still havnt seen one real peer reviewed paper from a recognised scientific journal supporting the anti-GMO position.

You guys are so full of fail, I hope I can catch "the stupid" off you idiots via the interwebz.

Science has apparently been "changed" to be pretty fucking unscientific!

Heres a real life expiriment for you dumbass, real rat, real gmo food, real gross. Those are your idols retard.

 

[Ninjabowler]

Yum, gm salmon

 

[ginjawarrior]

Proof it was debunked please. Or are you full of shit again?

tell me again about the tomatoes

Update:

Six French scientific academies issued a statement on 19 October, saying the Séralini study could not reverse previous conclusions that this and other GM crops are safe, because of problems with the experimental design, statistical analysis and animals used, and inadequate data. Meanwhile the European Food Safety Authority declared the study "of insufficient scientific quality to be considered as valid for risk assessment". As promised, the organisation invited Séralini "to share key additional information". That invitation was made on 4 October, and repeated on 19 October. Today, EFSA announced it had (again) made all the data it used to approve the GM maize available to Séralini.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22287-study-linking-gm-crops-and-cancer-questioned.html

http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2012/09/24/bad-science-on-gmos-it-reminds-me-of-the-antivaccine-movement/

Does genetically modified corn cause cancer? A flawed study fails to convince.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevensalzberg/2012/09/24/does-genetically-modified-corn-cause-cancer-a-flawed-study/

French GM Corn Study Not Scientifically Valid
By Dan Flynn | October 8, 2012

Last month’s study out of France that said genetically modified corn and a related herbicide caused organ damage, tumors, and early death among rats broke too many rules and should be dismissed as “of insufficient scientific quality,” the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) says.

http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2012/10/french-gm-corn-study-not-scientifically-valid/#.UQmzH_IauM0




now tell me about those horrible GMO tomatoes on the market

 

[ginjawarrior]

With Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in bed with Monsanto and Dow—as evidenced in a number of political and economic maneuvers, not least of all the removal of 1 million signatures for a GMO labeling campaign—it’s uncertain how easily the United Stateswill end genetic modification practices. Researchers across the world have already provided ample evidence of GMO’s harmful effects, including weight gain, organ disruption, infertility, tumor development, and the development of resistant weeds and pests. The push for change to natural, organic food and GMO labeling must come from the public.

tell me again about the horrible GMO tomaotes being sold in usa today

 

[Ninjabowler]

Why do you keep saying that, thats stupid you dumb shit. I already posted about the tomatos, why dont you tell us how this is not bad for the eco system? Is this study debunked because of crooked monsanto also.

 

[Ninjabowler]

Why is europe so against GMOs?

 

[Ninjabowler]

Is this why?

 

[Krondizzel]

That's kinda weird.

 

[ginjawarrior]

Why do you keep saying that, thats stupid you dumb shit. I already posted about the tomatos, why dont you tell us how this is not bad for the eco system? Is this study debunked because of crooked monsanto also.

i keep posting it because i like to point out how dumb your being

Originally Posted by Ninjabowler

I posted the answers to both of those questions, and it ends up being monsanto in the end cause theyre greedy dirty evil vampires that would suck anyone dry, kinda like you bud, gagwarrior

brilliant i love this part

"or worked out that gmo tomatoes arent produced anymore?"

answer = "monsanto in the end cause theyre greedy dirty evil vampires that would suck anyone dry,"

classic


flavr savr tomato
Economic difficulties forced Calgene to withdraw the Flavr Savr from grocery shelves in 1997


http://www.pbs.org/wnet/dna/pop_gene...ery/index.html

The tomato was withdrawn from the market by 1997 out of safety concerns


http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/c...ed-technology/

As a result of Calgene's business woes, production of the Flavor Savr tomatoes ceased. Sometime later, Monsanto took over Calgene.


http://www.brighthub.com/science/gen...les/27236.aspx

fish tomato

Q: Were fish genes ever inserted into a tomato?

A: Yes. Here (.pdf) is the approval for field test from the USDA. This document contains quite a bit of information about the “Fish Tomato” (a.ka. tomato; antifreeze gene; staphylococcal Protein A) and how DNA Plant Technology Corporation produced it. (They sold the technology to J.R. Simplot Company in 1995 and the company ceased R&D operations in 2002).


http://genomicgastronomy.com/blog/fish-tomato/

Fish Tomato

Another company, DNA Plant Technology, developed another GM tomato that was not economically successful. The company combined genes from an Arctic flounder with tomato DNA in an attempt to create cold-hardy tomato plants. The project was abandoned and the so-called fish tomatoes were never marketed. The controversial transgenic GM processes use genes from one species to be inserted into another species, such as fish genes into tomatoes, creating mutated, damaged DNA and interrupted, unnatural DNA sequences.



Read more: http://www.livestrong.com/article/54...#ixzz2JUpsb6qw

Fish Tomato

Another company, DNA Plant Technology, developed another GM tomato that was not economically successful. The company combined genes from an Arctic flounder with tomato DNA in an attempt to create cold-hardy tomato plants. The project was abandoned and the so-called fish tomatoes were never marketed. The controversial transgenic GM processes use genes from one species to be inserted into another species, such as fish genes into tomatoes, creating mutated, damaged DNA and interrupted, unnatural DNA sequences.



Read more: http://www.livestrong.com/article/54...#ixzz2JUpsb6qw

DNA plant technology
DNA Plant Technology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
DNA Plant Technology Corporation Former type Public (NASDAQ: DNAP)
Industry Biotechnology
Defunct 2002

DNA Plant Technology was an early pioneer in applying transgenic biotechnology to problems in agriculture. The company was founded in Cinnamonson, New Jersey. In 1994, their headquarters moved to Oakland, California.[1] Some of the plants and products they developed included Vine sweet mini peppers, the Fish tomato and Y1 Tobacco.

In the mid 1980s, DNAP attempted to use somaclonal variation with corn to produce buttery-tasting popcorn without the need to add butter.[2] In 1993, DNAP purchased the Freshworld premium fruit and vegetable brand from Du Pont for a mixture of shares, cash and intellectual rights valued at over $30 million.[3]

In 2002, Bionova shut down DNA Plant Technology.[4]
Contents

1 Major works
1.1 Fish tomato
1.2 Discovery of gene silencing
2 Legal controversy
3 References

Major works
Fish tomato

In 1991, DNA Plant Technology applied for and were granted permission to conduct a field test permit for their transgenic fish tomato product (tomato; antifreeze gene; staphylococcal Protein A) from the USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.[5] This product remains controversial[6] in the history of biotechnology, because an antifreeze gene isolated from an arctic flounder was transgenically inserted into a tomato in an attempt to create a frost-tolerant tomato. Although this product was tested in a greenhouse, and may have been tested in the field, it was never commercialized.

In 1995, DNA Plant Technology unveiled a second generation of a different transgenic tomato and served it at a meeting of its shareholders.[7] That same year, DNA Plant Technology sold its wholly owned subsidiary called to Frost Technology Corporation to Simplot.[8]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_Plant_Technology


you've been told all of this yet you still managed to go out misread your own source and still get it all wrong

you must have had a lifetime of practice to beable to field this level of fucking stupidity

the salmon are being raised at inland farm they are not being released into the enviroment

 

[ginjawarrior]

Is this why?

pictures from the debunked study?

classy

 

[Ninjabowler]

With Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in bed with Monsanto and Dow—as evidenced in a number of political and economic maneuvers, not least of all the removal of 1 million signatures for a GMO labeling campaign—it’s uncertain how easily the United Stateswill end genetic modification practices. Researchers across the world have already provided ample evidence of GMO’s harmful effects, including weight gain, organ disruption, infertility, tumor development, and the development of resistant weeds and pests. The push for change to natural, organic food and GMO labeling must come from the public.

 

[ginjawarrior]

***meaningless words***

so what about those tomatoes eh?

 

[Ninjabowler]

pictures from the debunked study?

classy

Theres lots to choose from bud, monsanto has tons of rats with tumors under their belt. Lots. Those tumors dont come from mother nature bud , theres somthing wrong with this picture. Its monsanto

 

[cannabineer]

processed and GMO are basically one in the same nowadays. aren't you paying attention?

They are not. They are distinct, and your conflating them can no longer be termed ignorance, but malice. You''re persisting in being incorrect, so I must ask what's in it for you? cn

 

[Ninjabowler]

so what about those tomatoes eh?

Why do you keep saying that?

 

[Ninjabowler]

Natural News Blog Exposing the Evils of Food Science and Bio-technology


OCT
2
Natural News Radar: GMO cancer RATS – news gone viral on the internet, but NOWHERE TO BE FOUND ON TV!









GMO CORN KILLING RATS. YOU'RE NEXT IF YOU DON'T KNOW ABOUT IT.


Find out why right now: http://buzz.naturalnews.com/000588-GMO_corn-GMO_corn_and_cancer_study-genetically_modified.html


The recent release of the first ever long-term study to examine the consequences of prolonged consumption of genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) has set the world ablaze calling for an immediate embargo ON ALL THINGS GMO.



I must repeat this part: This is the first LONG TERM STUDY EVER DONE on GMO! Turns out it does cause cancer, fast and via monstrous tumors! All these big chemo-tech companies breed the poison in food, deny its poison, and then sell it to doctors, hospitals and oncologists as the best way to heal this chemical “injury.” This disease that hits every third American … this slap in the face, “march for the cure” madness that begins and ends with corn and soy that’s contaminated with Roundup pesticide and others like it.



This precedent setting trial showing this GM corn strain causes cancer has attracted a torrent of abuse, especially in the United States, but it cannot be swept under the carpet any longer. Monsanto and DuPont have spent 7 million dollars and almost 5 million dollars, respectively, to shut down any labeling efforts in California alone, and that vote is coming up in 30 days!! California will set the precedent on labeling GMO all over the United States, and the masses will wake up to the real cause (75%) of cancer across the country – which is chemical food. It can no longer be denied, and after November voting in California, the news will jump, from the internet to the televisions in every den of the United States. Victory for the organic movement couldn’t be bigger than this right now.


http://www.naturalnews.com/037380_mainstream_media_blackout_GMO.html#ixzz289HXWtEx


Link to the details of the study:



Professor Gilles-Eric Ralini, professor of molecular biology at Caen University in France, pissed off the entire GM industry by revealing seven years of his questioning of the safety standards applied to varieties of GM maize (corn).


This study has blown the lid off of 15 – 20 years of lies and deceipt of everyone consuming unlabeled cancer causing GM corn, soy, sugar beets, alfalfa, and yes, meat and milk tests that prove hormones and antibiotics given to animals fuels cancer – well, that’s all forthcoming!


http://buzz.naturalnews.com/000588-GMO_corn-GMO_corn_and_cancer_study-genetically_modified.html


We should know exactly what is in our food at all times. This is no novel idea. This is common sense. When you see labels like artificial flavoring, artificial coloring, and GMO, you know you are eating NON-FOOD. Your body will have to fight to NOT USE the chemicals, to FLUSH THEM OUT of your body, and your cells will have to fight to NOT MUTATE. This is cancer. The cure is in your wallet – don’t buy chemical food. Boycott it altogether from this point forward.


The proof is in the pudding: Let me tell you know exactly who is pushing to keep GM food from being labeled. These are the companies that make it, that make cancer for you and I to eat, that want cancer food to remain without a label. These are the companies PAYING TO SUPPRESS the vote in California right now. Paying millions:


BASF plant science


BAYER crop science


Dow Agro-sciences


PepsiCo


Nestle


Coca-Cola


ConAgra


Smithfield Foods


Sara Lee


Ocean Spray


Land O’Lakes


Kraft


Heinz


Godiva chocolates


General Mills


Dole


Del Monte


Campbell Soup


Bumble Bee


Morton Salt


Kellogg


Hormel


Hershey


Dean Foods


Sunny Delight (I was allergic to that crap when I was little, no wonder!)


McCormick


J.M. Smucker


Wrigley





And here comes the SHOCKER!


According to the New York Times, the following “organic” brands sold out and are owned by GMO pushing evil corporations:



Name and True Owner:


Kashi – Kellogg


Horizon – Dean Foods


Odwalla and Honest tea – Coca Cola


Muir Glen and Cascadian Farm – General Mills



They are all silent about the whole vote in California. None of them will talk to the New York Times.








Posted 2nd October 2012 by 14AndOut: Freedom 4U starts right now!
Labels: supergerms bacteria deformations Herbicide superbugs viruses GMO Monsanto Pesticide sick biotechnology Insecticide twisted DNA Fluoride food science cancer

0 Add a comment


Loading

 

[cannabineer]

Why is europe so against GMOs?

Because just as here, the politics of emotion work. GM has been tarred with the brush of negative media review, and the voters in Europe have by and large uncritically accepted GM as being anti-eco, which is political death over there. Bottom line: they are so without sound reason. Jmo. cn

 

[Ninjabowler]

Ill give you one guess why this corn looks like this....ok..since your a little slow it starts with Mon and its not monster, close though