• Here is a link to the full explanation: https://rollitup.org/t/welcome-back-did-you-try-turning-it-off-and-on-again.1104810/

War against free speech...

beenthere

New Member
http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/28/opinion/ghitis-free-speech/index.html

It is an article from CNN about a UN push to consider limiting speech that insults religion.

Do you think speech should be limited? Do you think the UN has the power to limit free speech within America? On the internet? Do you think the UN should have that power?
The US should kick those SOB's out of NYC, tear the building down and erect a giant statue of a big dick inscribed "suck on this"
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
anyone worried about this is in the same camp as the retards worried about sharia law in our country.

1st amendment, read it.

one starred.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
anyone worried about this is in the same camp as the retards worried about sharia law in our country.

1st amendment, read it.

one starred.
Does the 1st amendment apply outside the USA?

Your daddy one starred you and the rest ran down your momma's leg...
 

beenthere

New Member
anyone worried about this is in the same camp as the retards worried about sharia law in our country.

1st amendment, read it.

one starred.


In spite of a court order that allows the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) to place ads in subways and buses in New York City, the NYC transit authority has now passed new rules on Thursday that some media outlets say will allow it to restrict free speech by banning ads that "could incite or provoke violence."

The AFDI had placed a series of ads in support of Israel and condemning Muslim extremism known as "the jihad." But it had to get a court order to do so. The court ruled that under current policies the transit authority did not have a legal right to prevent AFDI from placing the ads.

However, the transit authority decided to change its policies after the ads provoked a confrontation with police and supporters of the ads, initiated by a political commentator for CNN and MSNBC.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member


In spite of a court order that allows the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) to place ads in subways and buses in New York City, the NYC transit authority has now passed new rules on Thursday that some media outlets say will allow it to restrict free speech by banning ads that "could incite or provoke violence."

The AFDI had placed a series of ads in support of Israel and condemning Muslim extremism known as "the jihad." But it had to get a court order to do so. The court ruled that under current policies the transit authority did not have a legal right to prevent AFDI from placing the ads.

However, the transit authority decided to change its policies after the ads provoked a confrontation with police and supporters of the ads, initiated by a political commentator for CNN and MSNBC.
good job, captain fail.

this thread was about the united nations, not the new york city transit authority :dunce:

racist genius.
 

beenthere

New Member
Does the 1st amendment apply outside the USA?

...
who cares as long as the first amendment is not overturned here.

your dead mother was a whore.

good job, captain fail.

This thread was about the united nations, not the new york city transit authority :dunce:

racist genius.
Really, I thought the OP is talking about our 1st amendment here in the US, oh fuck it even says that in the title!
And by looking at your post saying who cares as long as it doesn't happen here, seems you are referring to the US. NYC transit is in the US, not the UN, right? LOL

CAPTAIN FAIL STRIKE AGAIN! what a fucking dolt.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Really, I thought the OP is talking about our 1st amendment here in the US, oh fuck it even says that in the title!
And by looking at your post saying who cares as long as it doesn't happen here, seems you are referring to the US. NYC transit is in the US, not the UN, right? LOL

CAPTAIN FAIL STRIKE AGAIN! what a fucking dolt.
you might have noticed this in the OP:

Do you think the UN has the power to limit free speech within America?

and you posted this:

the NYC transit authority has now passed new rules on Thursday that some media outlets say will allow it to restrict free speech


is the NYC transit authority the UN? :dunce:

you drooling racist retard.
 

beenthere

New Member
you might have noticed this in the OP:

Do you think the UN has the power to limit free speech within America?

and you posted this:

the NYC transit authority has now passed new rules on Thursday that some media outlets say will allow it to restrict free speech


is the NYC transit authority the UN? :dunce:

you drooling racist retard.
Meaning if the NYC transit can, what the fuck makes you think the UN can't, shit for brains. Do you ever fucking think before you open that big mouth if yours?

Don't you have some pm FAIL classes to attend?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Meaning if the NYC transit can, what the fuck makes you think the UN can't, shit for brains. Do you ever fucking think before you open that big mouth if yours?

Don't you have some pm FAIL classes to attend?
not all speech is protected. what is and what is not protected falls under the jurisdiction of our constitution, not mandate from the UN.

this is fright wing fear mongering bullshit for people like you to express fake indignation about. nothing more.
 

newatit2010

Well-Known Member
I'm sure the O was hiding in that group some where since madonna knows he is a "black muslim". OK buckey there is your fucking racist remarks jump on it. You racist bastard.
 

CC Dobbs

Well-Known Member
Buck you fucked up another thread, nice job.

I think that maybe the neanderthals that instigate and participate in violence because somebody called their sky-fairy a dumb-dumb should be the ones to worry about and censor. The stupid fucks that cause injuries and damage are the problem not the stupid fucks who share their opinions. Religious freedom comes with much responsibility not omnipotence.
 

newatit2010

Well-Known Member
Its called sarcasm, she was taking a shot at ignorant racists.

Looks like she hit the mark.
Maybe she is smarter than you and knows the truth that you are to blinded to see. Bet you call O a black muslim like that you would be in jail, she is just a fund raiser. Did you give on her remarks??
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
Meaning if the NYC transit can, what the fuck makes you think the UN can't, shit for brains. Do you ever fucking think before you open that big mouth if yours?

Don't you have some pm FAIL classes to attend?

You don't really understand how government in this country work do you? I've seen these sorts of misunderstandings on your part before.

the local government can indeed attempt to do as it wishes and it may be slapped down by state government and state governments can be sanctioned by the Federal government. and THAT is as high as it goes in this country so long as we are a sovereign nation with distinct borders. These rightist fear tactics have no relationship with reality, the U.N. cannot take away our guns or our freedom of speech and muslims cannot institute sharia law in the U.S.

This is just more rightist neglect of realtiy.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
You don't really understand how government in this country work do you? I've seen these sorts of misunderstandings on your part before.

the local government can indeed attempt to do as it wishes and it may be slapped down by state government and state governments can be sanctioned by the Federal government. and THAT is as high as it goes in this country so long as we are a sovereign nation with distinct borders. These rightist fear tactics have no relationship with reality, the U.N. cannot take away our guns or our freedom of speech and muslims cannot institute sharia law in the U.S.

This is just more rightist neglect of realtiy.
Try this scenario...

A person makes a Utube video that angers muslims. And that person is put into jail *without parole* for a trumped up reason to appease the muslims.

President Obama took an oath to the Constitution, not to muslims. Yet we clearly have supression of free speech.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Try this scenario...

A person makes a Utube video that angers muslims. And that person is put into jail *without parole* for a trumped up reason to appease the muslims.

President Obama took an oath to the Constitution, not to muslims. Yet we clearly have supression of free speech.
that guy went to jail for violating the terms of his previous sentence you fucking dullard.

learn to spell suppression, kiddo.

 

Wilksey

Well-Known Member
Do you think speech should be limited?
Fuck no.

Do you think the UN has the power to limit free speech within America?
Fuck no.

On the internet?
Fuck no.

Do you think the UN should have that power?
Fuck no.

The persecution of speech is not acceptable in any free society, and the consequences of doing so are FAR more detrimental to a culture than ANY supposed "offense" caused by "free speech".

See:

NAZI Germany
Stalinist Russia (hell....those folks STILL haven't got beyond their commie past)
Fascist Italy
Khmer Rouge Cambodia
Uganda under Idi Amin
Etc, etc, etc.......

FUCK the U.N., and ANYONE that calls for restricting the individuals' RIGHT to express their opinion, REGARDLESS if that opinion is "offensive".
 
Top