• Here is a link to the full explanation: https://rollitup.org/t/welcome-back-did-you-try-turning-it-off-and-on-again.1104810/

Romney to release 2011 tax return, paid IRS 14.1 percent

squarepush3r

Well-Known Member
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/romney-release-2011-tax-return-paid-irs-14-181125301--election.html

Romney to release 2011 tax return, paid IRS 14.1 percent


By Olivier Knox, Yahoo! News
The Ticket – 42 mins ago


Mitt Romney arrives in Las Vegas, Nevada September 21, 2012. (Brian Snyder/Reuters)
Looking to blunt relentless Democratic attacks, Mitt Romney is to release on Friday his 2011 tax return, a summary of his effective tax rates for the past two decades—and threw in two doctor's notes attesting to the good physical health of the candidate and running mate Paul Ryan.
The tax return was to be be released at 3 p.m. Eastern time on the website www.mittromney.com/disclosure. Ahead of the release, the former Massachusetts governor's campaign released a blog post summarizing the document. Releasing information on a Friday afternoon is traditionally a way to reduce the amount of media exposure.
The move fulfills a promise Romney made earlier in the 2012 campaign. But it was unlikely to quiet Democratic criticisms that Romney has failed to live up to a standard set by his father, former Michigan Governor George Romney, who released a decade of tax returns when he ran for president.
The Romneys, who filed their tax return this morning, paid $1,935,708 in taxes on $13,696,951 of mostly investment income for an effective tax rate of 14.1 percent. (The Obamas paid an effective tax rate of 20.5 percent in 2011, a lower rate than his secretary, according to the White House.)
Romney, who is thought to have a personal fortune in the neighborhood of $250 million, gave $4,020,772 to charity, 30 percent of their income. (The Obamas gave 21.8 percent of their income to charities).
The blog post, written by the manager of Romney's blind trust since 2003, R. Bradford Malt, said the Romneys had filed their 2011 tax return with the IRS this morning. It also indicated that the Romneys' tax preparer, PricewaterhouseCoopers, would provide a letter summarizing the tax rates that the Romneys paid from 1990 to 2009.
The Romney's paid an average annual effective federal tax rate of 20.20 percent, with the lowest rate coming in at 13.66 percent. Over that same stretch of time, they gave an average of 13.45 percent of their adjusted gross income to charity.
"During the 20-year period covered by the PWC letter, Gov. and Mrs. Romney paid 100 percent of the taxes that they owed," the blog post said.
Democrats led by the Obama campaign have repeatedly hit Romney over his refusal to disclose his tax returns -- a fight that has helped to keep Romney's vast wealth in the media spotlight at a time when the president is trying to paint him as an out-of-touch millionaire out to help the wealthy.
 

squarepush3r

Well-Known Member
Personal commentary, I suspected he took part in the IRS tax amnesty program for Swiss bank accounts which is why he may have not been releasing his tax records. I guess we will find out if this is the case coming up!
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
He paid more in taxes than I did, percentage wise. I find it odd that the figurehead for the social equity party didn't give as much to charity as the guy who supposedly represents the evil money grubbing selfish fat cat party.
Perhaps a liberal progressive democrat can explain this conundrum to me.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Personal commentary, I suspected he took part in the IRS tax amnesty program for Swiss bank accounts which is why he may have not been releasing his tax records. I guess we will find out if this is the case coming up!
he's only releasing returns for years he knew he would be running for president.

that's telling.
 

Fungus Gnat

Well-Known Member
Which deductions would those be? Be specific.
If Romney had taken all his deductions, he wd have paid closer to 9% tax in 2011. He paid extra VOLUNTARILY just for optics.
It was nice of him.

I'd think people would want me to follow the law and pay only what the tax code requires."
I guess he flip flopped again. Also it has to do with his charitable donations deductions he can still amend them though and get his 5% back.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
we'll have to wait for froomkin to get specific then. but i bet he's right, romney opened his big mouth back in august about never paying less than 13% even though we all know that claim is full of shit.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
we'll have to wait for froomkin to get specific then. but i bet he's right, romney opened his big mouth back in august about never paying less than 13% even though we all know that claim is full of shit.
Really? News to me. Do you have a source for years he paid less than 13%?
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
It was nice of him.


I guess he flip flopped again. Also it has to do with his charitable donations deductions he can still amend them though and get his 5% back.
so where did you get this little tidbit?
If Romney had taken all his deductions, he wd have paid closer to 9% tax in 2011. He paid extra VOLUNTARILY just for optics.
What official source do you claim this as a specific that used wd for the word 'would'? Do official sources of tax information now send texts?

By being specific I didn't mean to just make shit up and pull it directly from your ass. Links, proof or its just all a big giant lie that you made up. Are you a big Liar fungus? Do you just make shit up?

Are you sure Samwell didn't send this to you cuz the end of the sentence says 'optics' and it makes no sense, which is why I was wondering if sammy said it, cuz most of his posts don't make sense either.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
so where did you get this little tidbit?
What official source do you claim this as a specific that used wd for the word 'would'? Do official sources of tax information now send texts?

By being specific I didn't mean to just make shit up and pull it directly from your ass. Links, proof or its just all a big giant lie that you made up. Are you a big Liar fungus? Do you just make shit up?

Are you sure Samwell didn't send this to you cuz the end of the sentence says 'optics' and it makes no sense, which is why I was wondering if sammy said it, cuz most of his posts don't make sense either.
the assertion of 9% comes from a fellow named froomkin, i imagine he knows what he is talking about and doesn't want to end his pundit career or damage it over something like this. i'm going to keep abreast of what he says and how he breaks it down.

and 'just for optics' makes perfect sense. did you spend too much time on the combine yesterday?
 

Fungus Gnat

Well-Known Member
The most unusual aspect of Romney's tax filing for 2011, based on the summary provided by his trustee, is that he and his wife chose not to deduct all of their charitable contributions -- a decision that led to them paying a higher effective tax rate.
Romney in August declared that he had paid at least 13 percent in taxes over the past decade. Had he deducted all of his $4 million in charitable donations, his tax rate would have fallen below that figure.
Romney told ABC News in July: "If I had paid more than are legally due I don't think I'd be qualified to become president."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/21/mitt-romney-tax-returns-released_n_1904242.html
For Nodrama llama.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
Liberals are extremely generous when they're giving away other people's money to the poor, the lazy and to pet projects, it's parting with their own money that is more of a problem for them.

But now we have the newly passed Buffet Rule. The senate can vote for it and all the wealthy Libs can put their money where their mouths run endlessly.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/romney-release-2011-tax-return-paid-irs-14-181125301--election.html

Romney to release 2011 tax return, paid IRS 14.1 percent


By Olivier Knox, Yahoo! News
The Ticket – 42 mins ago


Romney, who is thought to have a personal fortune in the neighborhood of $250 million, gave $4,020,772 to charity, 30 percent of their income. (The Obamas gave 21.8 percent of their income to charities).
.
IT IS NOT CHARITY WHeN IT IS MANDATORY
ROMNEYS CHURCH MAKES IT MANDATORY
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
IT IS NOT CHARITY WHeN IT IS MANDATORY
ROMNEYS CHURCH MAKES IT MANDATORY
The law says it is. Are you telling people they shouldn't obey laws? Wouldn't that lead to anarchy and ultimately the destruction of our way of life? You really want that on your conscious?
 
Top