really comfy slippers
Active Member
Dont temp me with a good time hahaha
Did Ron Paul Win Iowa, Nevada, Minnesota, Colorado and Missouri?
- Thread starter deprave
- Start date
desert dude
Well-Known Member
"You're so full of shit your breath smells like a buffalo fart on a hot day."
That's one I haven't heard before. Very descriptive.
That's one I haven't heard before. Very descriptive.
jdillinger
Active Member
Lol lets all just calm down. Supposedly they might be re-releasing the maine caucus results. Maybe, RP will win maybe not, we ca n only hope. Regardless expect maine gop management heads to roll.
jdillinger
Active Member
Favorability Ratings for Republican Presidential Candidates[TABLE="width: 375"]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[TD]Favorable[/TD]
[TD]Unfavorable[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]N. Gingrich[/TD]
[TD]25%[/TD]
[TD]63%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]R. Paul[/TD]
[TD]42%[/TD]
[TD]36%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]M. Romney[/TD]
[TD]34%[/TD]
[TD]54%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]R. Santorum[/TD]
[TD]32%[/TD]
[TD]38%[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
According to CNN's National favorablity poll February 10-13, 2012.
These are good numbers, but this is just a favorability poll.
EDIT: BTW How the fuck did santorum win three states? This guy has so many negatives.
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[TD]Favorable[/TD]
[TD]Unfavorable[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]N. Gingrich[/TD]
[TD]25%[/TD]
[TD]63%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]R. Paul[/TD]
[TD]42%[/TD]
[TD]36%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]M. Romney[/TD]
[TD]34%[/TD]
[TD]54%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]R. Santorum[/TD]
[TD]32%[/TD]
[TD]38%[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
According to CNN's National favorablity poll February 10-13, 2012.
These are good numbers, but this is just a favorability poll.
EDIT: BTW How the fuck did santorum win three states? This guy has so many negatives.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
just for the record, that poll is an outlier with respect to ron paul's favorability rating, which is actually 10% net negative using an average of all polls (including that one).
http://polltracker.talkingpointsmemo.com/contest/us-favorability-paul
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
I would like to add that Gingrich and Romney's dislikes are high since they have been viciously pummeling each other. Nobody is paying any attention to Ron Paul and his disapproval is pretty damn high taking that into account.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
santorum just sat back in florida and watched them duke it out, well played.
watch out for him. this could be barry goldwater, version 2.0 in the form of santorum.
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
That is the answer as to why Santorum won 3 states... He was not a target at the time. Also, this is why Obama's numbers are not very accurate. The Republican party is busy fisting itself and not focused on the real objective which is Obama. Once the smoke clears and they get their message in line his numbers will take a hit.
desert dude
Well-Known Member
Santorum has absolutely no resemblance to Barry Goldwater, not physically, not intellectually, not policy wise.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that's why it is version 2.0, but still the same spirit of going outside what the party mainstreamers would want and towards an ultra-conservative.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
doubtful.
with all the carrying on about contraception (of all things), i can't see any clear message coming out of the right, whereas obama has been building up a very clear one for some time now.
desert dude
Well-Known Member
Goldwater hated the social conservatives. He was conservative fiscally, and pretty darn liberal socially. I wish he were alive and running in this election.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that's true, he had a libertarian streak in him as well.
What Obama message is that? "Watch me tank this mutha!"?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
to answer your question, his message is focused on income inequality, which is at its highest level since 1928. but of course, we all know nothing bad happened around that time!
Obama did none of those things.The DJIA is a very poor analogy for the overall economy, besides it is the central bank who made that happen, certainly not Obama. 3.7 million jobs created, 20 million lost.
Love the GDP growth rate chart, its easy to make that as big as you want, every dollar the government borrows and spends becomes part of the GDP. Hell you could show 200% growth in GDP with 100% unemployment and the US Government borrowing 150 Trillion from The Fed for a single year. You don't even need an economy to show GDP growth.
Love the GDP growth rate chart, its easy to make that as big as you want, every dollar the government borrows and spends becomes part of the GDP. Hell you could show 200% growth in GDP with 100% unemployment and the US Government borrowing 150 Trillion from The Fed for a single year. You don't even need an economy to show GDP growth.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
bla bla bla
you don't really get to use that "watch me tank this mutha" nonsense when a clear recovery is evident. that was my point.
nothing to say about income inequality? my prediction is that you'll go to some weird logical conclusion that because i say "income inequality", i must want a brain surgeon to make as much as a garbage man. ya know, that's generally your style.
If you want more income equality then learn how to make more money, don't expect someone to hand it to you. Raising the min wage will only cause dollar devaluation and more unemployment.
sync0s
Well-Known Member
While I understand your argument that Obama is centralized on income inequality, you have to see the smoke in mirrors with him. Inflation caused by spending coupled with causing deficits to programs like social security? The guy is bankrupting the lower classes without them knowing it. He is creating a bottom class that is totally dependent on the government one step at a time.
