• Here is a link to the full explanation: https://rollitup.org/t/welcome-back-did-you-try-turning-it-off-and-on-again.1104810/

What do modern day servicemen and veterans think of Ron Paul and the government?

hazyintentions

hazyintentions

Well-Known Member
[video=youtube;AdCHytzyiIQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdCHytzyiIQ&feature=related[/video]

[video=youtube;zflf4cpSflM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zflf4cpSflM&feature=related[/video]


[video=youtube;RMQHphxehBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMQHphxehBE&feature=related[/video]

[video=youtube;UO2RujOK43I]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UO2RujOK43I&feature=related[/video]

[video=youtube;59NNHfnMRng]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59NNHfnMRng[/video]

I'm sure I'll receive a volley from the usual users but I'll Post anyways, you can follow these type of youtube videos all day. I don't see any soldiers getting on youtube talking about how they love Obama, do you?
 
Smirgen

Smirgen

Well-Known Member
Our Enlisted men and women would like to see some class injected into the Whitehouse for once with a leader who wont be careless with their Honor or their blood.

Who else but Ron Paul could do that .
 
hazyintentions

hazyintentions

Well-Known Member
Smirgen said:
Our Enlisted men and women would like to see some class injected into the Whitehouse for once with a leader who wont be careless with their Honor or their blood.

Who else but Ron Paul could do that .
Click to expand...
It's sure seems so, I guess it's easier to see the atrocities are government is responsible for when it's your neck on the line.

Where's the fagfuckers on this one? Are they going to tell us the these military servicemen/women are wrong now?
 
dukeanthony

dukeanthony

New Member
The Fantasy of Ron Paul's Military Support

7:31 PM, Oct 18, 2007 • By MICHAEL GOLDFARB

Does Andrew Sullivan read stories before he comments on them? In this case, I suspect he didn't, otherwise he's engaging in pure military-related fantasy. In response to this article from the Houston Chronicle reporting that Ron Paul and Barack Obama lead all candidates in fund raising among "donors identified as affiliated with the military," Sullivan headlines a post "Whom the Troops Support," with this stunningly self-indulgent conclusion (actually this is the whole post):
Just one indicator, of course: campaign donations from active service military members. And guess who's first? Ron Paul. Second? Barack Obama. Those tasked to actually fighting this war get it, don't they?
​
Except this isn't about campaign donations from "active service military members," whatever they might be, but "donors affiliated with the military," which Sullivan might have noticed had he slogged through the whole first sentence of the story. In fact, the first "active service military member" and Ron Paul supporter interviewed for the piece is 72-year-old Lindell Anderson, a retired Army chaplain from Fort Worth. Further, the Chron notes that the average size of Paul's donations from this subset was $500. How many active duty soldiers are giving $500 to fringe candidates a year out from the election? Not many, I suspect. In fact, among all the candidates, the total number of contributors surveyed here numbered less than 1,000--out of an Armed Forces of 2.2 million. And, remember, most of these contributors aren't even active duty.
 
dukeanthony

dukeanthony

New Member
WASHINGTON — Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul, the congressman from the Houston area who opposes the Iraq war, has gotten more contributions than any other White House contender from donors identified as affiliated with the military.
According to a Houston Chronicle analysis of campaign records from January through September, Paul received $63,440 in donations from current military employees and several retired military personnel.
Democrat Barack Obama, another war critic, was second in military giving. The Illinois senator got $53,968 during the nine months.
 
squarepush3r

squarepush3r

Well-Known Member
Its because people in the military want to fight for noble purposes, not the whim of a president which probably has global interests in mind or major corporations. Being in the military doesn't mean you want to die for any reason. Ron Paul only wants to use the military for DEFENSE, not launching pre-emptive measures for Haliburton, world police, etc..
 
Mr Neutron

Mr Neutron

Well-Known Member
dukeanthony said:
How many troops In Iraq now?
Click to expand...
On war, Obama has been worse than Bush

dukeanthony said:
Did we stop all combat operations?
Click to expand...
That's the rumor but if that's true, why are our servicemen still getting killed there?

dukeanthony said:
AND THANK YOU OBAMA FOR HELPING GET RID OF MOAMMAR GHADDAFI WITHOUT A SINGLE AMERICAN CASUALTIE
Click to expand...
Oh yes, thank you fearless leader for invading yet another sovereign nation that posed NO threat to the USA.

Yup, he's the man. Says what he means and means what he says, uh huh... boomshacklacka.
 
hazyintentions

hazyintentions

Well-Known Member
dukeanthony said:
How many troops In Iraq now? Did we stop all combat operations?

AND THANK YOU OBAMA FOR HELPING GET RID OF MOAMMAR GHADDAFI WITHOUT A SINGLE AMERICAN CASUALTIE
Click to expand...
How many you ask? Something like 46,000

Troops in Iraq - Total 46,000 U.S. troops as of June 30, 2011. All other nations have withdrawn their troops.
U.S. Troop Casualties - 4,477 US troops; 98% male. 91% non-officers; 82% active duty, 11% National Guard; 74% Caucasian, 9% African-American, 11% Latino. 19% killed by non-hostile causes. 54% of US casualties were under 25 years old. 72% were from the US Army
Click to expand...
source: http://usliberals.about.com/od/homelandsecurit1/a/IraqNumbers.htm

by the way dukeanthony it's spelled casualty. :)


http://icasualties.org/OEF/ByYear.aspx


Notice how the number of US casualties has more than double since Obama take the oath of office? Or how about 1120 US troops have died since he took office? these deaths for nothing but for the politicians to claim we are protecting our interests.. If fact more troops have died under his watch as commander in chief in the past 32 months than all of the 7+ years Bush had us in this war...

52% of those casualties are under 25 (my age range) and you can still continue to justify your resolve while my generation is suffering?

Fuck you, fuck you in the ass, I cannot wait until your generation dies off and leaves us with a destroyed nation so that we can rebuild it and restore it to it's glory.
 
mista sativa

mista sativa

Well-Known Member
Its funny how duke anthony spends all his time on rollitup bashing Ron Paul. Don't you have anything better to do?
 
hazyintentions

hazyintentions

Well-Known Member
mista sativa said:
Its funny how duke anthony spends all his time on rollitup bashing Ron Paul. Don't you have anything better to do?
Click to expand...
No, I'm I'm curious as to what (if he replies) his reply will be to my previous post. You can't justify sending kids to die so you can feel a false sense of security.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top