worm5376
Well-Known Member
Idk how it feels but being bored of money is not a factor in my life right now, if it ever becomes one you'll all know because i will be throwing some big ass festivals,concerts... Shit like that.
Not releasing OSAMA Piks cuz of SENSITIVITY? WTF?
- Thread starter patlpp
- Start date
LaKapitone
Active Member
Hell yeah, me too.
...& I sure as Hell wouldn't have time to be on R.I.U. anymore. I always tell myself if I get rich, I'd still do normal shiit... but that's easy to say when your broke.
...& I sure as Hell wouldn't have time to be on R.I.U. anymore. I always tell myself if I get rich, I'd still do normal shiit... but that's easy to say when your broke.
worm5376
Well-Known Member
Pffft, This site would become obsolete to me. Maybe i would come on just to make threads about my cool ass parties and shit but I would be too busy chillin in my Limo, sippin on some Jack (special reserve barrel) Daniels.
tet1953
Well-Known Member
I had a Jack Daniels period. Wasn't pretty lol
worm5376
Well-Known Member
LaKapitone
Active Member
Lmao @ I had a Jack Daniels "period."
I don't drink... I only drink wine on occasion. Not to say I haven't had Jack lol. Probably why I no longer drink. Lol jk. Nah, just a smoker. I'm not a fan of limo's... I like compact cars, sports cars... Porche - two seaters. I like the idea of being in a $100,000+ car, that is so fucking small, a blunt would hotbox the fuck out of it in 2-puffs in. Lol. Use to own a BMW Z3 - hotboxed it once & had to take a break from smoking for a good 3-4 days lol.
Imagine boxing this baby... or infant rather, with the roof up.
I don't drink... I only drink wine on occasion. Not to say I haven't had Jack lol. Probably why I no longer drink. Lol jk. Nah, just a smoker. I'm not a fan of limo's... I like compact cars, sports cars... Porche - two seaters. I like the idea of being in a $100,000+ car, that is so fucking small, a blunt would hotbox the fuck out of it in 2-puffs in. Lol. Use to own a BMW Z3 - hotboxed it once & had to take a break from smoking for a good 3-4 days lol.
Imagine boxing this baby... or infant rather, with the roof up.
bajafox
Well-Known Member
Too bad Mexico didn't catch him, his pictures would be all over Univision
Yahoo main page is saying that the White House has decided to not show the pictures, now I'm leaning towards the conspiracy theorists, there is no reason whatsoever why these pictures should not be seen by the public
Yahoo main page is saying that the White House has decided to not show the pictures, now I'm leaning towards the conspiracy theorists, there is no reason whatsoever why these pictures should not be seen by the public
tet1953
Well-Known Member
I think they'll show it, eventually, somehow. To not do so leaves too much doubt in the minds of many, and the faithful are already making noise about his not really being dead. Photos and/or video will probably get leaked a la wiki or some news source, and then the administration can "reluctantly" acknowledge their veracity.
You may have seen my other post about videos that may or may not have been made beforehand; I won't repeat it here. I think it's quite possible though.
You may have seen my other post about videos that may or may not have been made beforehand; I won't repeat it here. I think it's quite possible though.
LaKapitone
Active Member
One can argue the point with - There's no reason whatsoever why these pictures SHOULD be seen by the public.
Not to say I agree with either side, I can care less to be honest. Didn't know the dude, his death does nothing but promote another terrorist to charge, an by seeing him dead, accomplishes nothing for me. But, that's just me. Also, remember... this is Obama in office now, different decisions are going to be made about these sorts of things. Especially so close to a re-election, any bit of backlash that could be received through releasing a photo, would not be beneficial to him right now. For all we know, the Democratic party advised him not to release the photos. We don't know.
I've never seen a photo of any dead terrorist from Iraq/Afg. that they been killing these past years... so what's the difference here? He's dead. If he weren't... you don't think he wouldn't be so embarrassed by the U.S. (who he hates) that he wouldn't pick up his little camcorder & make a video saying he's well? If he died a long time ago (the other theory) during Bush's term, you don't think they wouldn't have taken photo's then & just re-dated them?
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
The only people demanding to see them as proof that he is dead are the same people that will scream the photos are photoshopped after they see them.
Osama Bin Laden's wife was in the compound when he was killed. She identified the body.
NOBODY with any credibility in Pakistan or elsewhere is contradicting that he is dead.
So, the US has nothing to gain by releasing the photos.
Osama Bin Laden's wife was in the compound when he was killed. She identified the body.
NOBODY with any credibility in Pakistan or elsewhere is contradicting that he is dead.
So, the US has nothing to gain by releasing the photos.
bajafox
Well-Known Member
The way I see it, in America if a man is convicted of murder and then sentenced to death, the family of the victim in most cases is allowed to see the murderer die.
There are over 3000 families out there who deserve to see this picture, maybe not the general public, but this guy murdered over 3000 Americans and they deserve to see proof that the man who ordered 9/11 is truly dead.
There are over 3000 families out there who deserve to see this picture, maybe not the general public, but this guy murdered over 3000 Americans and they deserve to see proof that the man who ordered 9/11 is truly dead.
The Cryptkeeper
Well-Known Member
I wouldn't say they were photoshopped, I just want to see his dead body. I know he's dead, the only question is WHEN he died.
The Cryptkeeper
Well-Known Member
Now that's what I cal perspective.
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
So are you going to carbon date the photo or something?
The Cryptkeeper
Well-Known Member
No. The photo wouldn't help date it to much. The color of his beard would give us ageneral idea, but no. I just want to see his corpse.So are you going to carbon date the photo or something?
LaKapitone
Active Member
+rep for the next year. LOL.
This is exactly what I've been saying... even if those same theorists weren't going to cry "Photoshop" there will still be people who do.
Which creates a never ending string of excuses & proof.
Like I said... the question isn't WHY we can't see them but WHY we need to see them?
The fact of the matter is, 9-11 probably wasn't even a job conducted through Bin Laden, but our own Government.
So trust me, when Bush dies... you will see his burial... so they can all be happy (3,000+ victims)
In the case that a murderer is put on trial for the family to see, is MUCH different... that's a PRIVATE viewing AMONG the family/victims.
They don't show the murderer get killed on TV, do they? So why in this case?
3,000 people is a lot, but when you compare it to the world, it is not... therefore it weighs out in favor of holding the photos provately.
What are they suppose to do, call in the 3,000 victims families & show them?
Come on... it's mute. You know?
Lmao, how easy would it be to touch his beard up with different colors? Wtf... simple technique on PS. They can produce 100 photos for you right now that are fake & you wouldn't know. So, brings me to the point of... who cares? If you don't believe them now, what's going to make you believe them when they release a photo that can easily be fraud as well?