Yet Another Light Quiz

Status
Not open for further replies.
TeaTreeOil

TeaTreeOil

Well-Known Member
Read this before posting: https://www.rollitup.org/misc.php?do=cfrules



And now for the problems!
1. List in order of most intense to least intense.
2. List in order of highest color temperature to least color temperature.

Bonus(for the real experts):
3. Specify the lumen output, and color temperature for each letter.
4. Specify which one is actually 7 light sources superimposed with varying intensities and color temperatures.

For reference the room is 2'x4'x6'.

Can't wait to see who really knows their lighting!

Good luck & have fun.
 
laserbrn

laserbrn

Well-Known Member
All this can really show me is which of these boxes produces "white" on my monitor the best. I can see more spectrums of light with eyes than a plant can uses with it's leaves. I don't want you to feel like I'm attacking you, I want CFL's to work for the obvious reasons that you enjoy them. They are cooler running, work in small spaces and are cheaper.

I'm just failing to see where these pictures provide any relevance, but the brightest on my monitor is "D". Only because it's the whitest, it's about the same "brightness" as the background white on this website.
 
t@intshredder

t@intshredder

Well-Known Member
You'll have trouble getting correct answers out of people as different monitors are calibrated for different color temperatures, gamma, brightness, contrast, etc.
For instance 'B' might look very red on my laptop but greenish on my desktop ...which is indeed the case.
 
Schmarmpit

Schmarmpit

Well-Known Member
1. D, A, E, C, B
2. C, D, A, E, B
3. too much effort required
4. D

I'm guessing this is CFL propoganda? Right on.
 
t@intshredder

t@intshredder

Well-Known Member
laserbrn said:
All this can really show me is which of these boxes produces "white" on my monitor the best. I can see more spectrums of light with eyes than a plant can uses with it's leaves. I don't want you to feel like I'm attacking you, I want CFL's to work for the obvious reasons that you enjoy them. They are cooler running, work in small spaces and are cheaper.

I'm just failing to see where these pictures provide any relevance, but the brightest on my monitor is "D". Only because it's the whitest, it's about the same "brightness" as the background white on this website.
Click to expand...
Precisely. For this to be a valid test, TeaTreeOil, you're going to have to provide an .ICC or .CSF file that we could all use in order to synchronize our OS color information with yours.
Otherwise we're all looking at very different images.
 
TeaTreeOil

TeaTreeOil

Well-Known Member
The ICC profile is definitely there. I just checked. I was actually thinking you might have a point and that imageshack removed the ICC profile, as it sometimes resamples(lowers quality) on images.

I put plenty of thought into this. You have yet to point out a single flaw... besides your own.
 
Greyskull

Greyskull

Well-Known Member
TeaTreeOil I'd like to see some pics of your plants. I cannot seem to find any....

these little illustrations are not showing anybody YOUR real world results.

I'd just like to see some real world results, please.

thanks


for motivation here's mine fresh the garden day 52. enjoy.

oh yeah, 1000 HPS 10" above the canopy...

peace out.
 

Attachments

laserbrn

laserbrn

Well-Known Member
Greyskull said:
TeaTreeOil I'd like to see some pics of your plants. I cannot seem to find any....

these little illustrations are not showing anybody YOUR real world results.

I'd just like to see some real world results, please.

thanks


for motivation here's mine fresh the garden day 52. enjoy.

oh yeah, 1000 HPS 10" above the canopy...

peace out.
Click to expand...

mmmmm.....see that's nice.

TeaTree you don't provide any real context for all these drawings and animations.....it's a bunch of nearly black and white photos that REPRESENT something presumably, but from here we can't tell what exactly you are trying to get across.
 
t@intshredder

t@intshredder

Well-Known Member
TeaTreeOil said:
The ICC profile is definitely there. I just checked. I was actually thinking you might have a point and that imageshack removed the ICC profile, as it sometimes resamples(lowers quality) on images.

I put plenty of thought into this. You have yet to point out a single flaw... besides your own.
Click to expand...
Damn, Chachie! Plenty of thought? So if I didn't tell you that you should distribute an ICC profile, you would have realized that without it your test was useless, all on your own?
Look, you obviously have missed the part where your image will be rendered differently on different monitors. Thereby rendering your test completely useless.
Just forget the dumb tests. Your wasting your time.
Actually, never mind. Don't forget them. There's nothing good on TV today and watching you fail time and time again is pure entertainment.
 
Greyskull

Greyskull

Well-Known Member
btw i've seen thunderkuls/mrbombdiggity's... i've seen nursefraudblueskirt's... i know CFLS can grow plants

I just want to see what kind of quality a person of your apptitude gets from CFLs.... must be spectacular the way you defend them to the bone. Which is respectable. Just show me why... thanks
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top