Canadian Stuff

printer

Well-Known Member
Transgender MLA aims to bring change to justice, health-care systems
Logan Oxenham is celebrating a number of firsts this month. He was elected for the first time to Manitoba's legislature with the New Democrats in the Oct. 3 election. The 46-year-old's win has also been called historic, as he's believed to be the first openly transgender person elected at the provincial level in Manitoba, and possibly in Canada. He was also just measured for his first fitted suit.

"I feel honoured," Oxenham said in a recent interview about his election win. "I feel that I have an opportunity now to really amplify voices that have traditionally not been heard in places such as the legislative building,"

Transgender and gender-diverse people have long been under-represented in political office at all levels of government. Jamie Lee Hamilton was the first transgender person to seek public office in Canada, when she unsuccessfully ran for Vancouver city council in 1996. Since then, a small group of transgender men and women and non-binary individuals have put their names on ballots. An even smaller number have been elected. Julie Lemieux, a transgender woman, became the first openly transgender person elected as a mayor in Canada in 2017, when she became leader of the small village of Tres-Saint-Redempteur, Que.

LGBTQ advocates say while there has been a push for governments to be more representative of the communities they serve, prejudicial and discriminatory policies and rhetoric have made it more difficult, and in some cases unsafe, for transgender people to take on more public roles.

"It takes tremendous courage and resilience to have to go through that barrage of hate and to make yourself so publicly vulnerable to simply run for political office," said Kristopher Wells, Canada Research Chair for the public understanding of sexual and gender minority youth. "In many cases, you have to turn the other cheek and try to persevere and rise above much of that blatant prejudice and discrimination."

The New Brunswick and Saskatchewan governments recently moved to require children under 16 to have parental consent to change their names or pronouns at school. They have argued they're defending the rights of parents, while critics say the policies trample on the rights of vulnerable youth. Several rallies have taken place across the country with demonstrators on both sides.

Oxenham said it has been agonizing to watch youth being targeted for who they are.

"Trans youth are such brilliant and resilient folks who get up every morning to go to school and try to live in this society that's telling them that they can't exist or they shouldn't."

Oxenham first ran in the 2022 byelection for the Winnipeg riding of Kirkfield Park. He lost to Progressive Conservative Kevin Klein. He credits months of hard work and "knocking on thousands of doors" for his win this time around, adding residents he spoke with expressed disgust over the tone of the Progressive Conservatives' campaign. The Tories campaigned on stronger parental rights in schools, but did not elaborate on what that meant. Oxenham said he's ready to advocate for transgender youth as an MLA.

"Their voices are the least heard throughout this time of regressive policies, but we should really be listening to the youth for guidance on these things," he said.

Helen Kennedy, executive director of the national LGBTQ organization Egale Canada, said it's important to have transgender and gender-diverse people in political spheres, because it breaks down stereotypes that lead to discrimination.

"It's so important for the conversation that they can have at the table in terms of policy development and issues around health care and education," she said. "Those lived experiences are invaluable."

Kennedy said it's been exciting to watch LGBTQ people put their names forward in Manitoba politics. Uzoma Asagwara, who is non-binary, was re-elected for a second term with the NDP. Transgender candidates Shandi Strong and Trevor Kirczenow ran unsuccessfully for the Liberals. Strong has known Oxenham for many years. She said she hopes he'll be able to make a difference in his new position.

"Our voices must continue to be heard to correct the misinformation campaigns and return us to the path of progress," she said in an email.

Before being elected, Oxenham spent 12 years as a juvenile correctional officer and a youth counsellor. Oxenham said he wants to use his first-hand knowledge of working in justice and of navigating the health-care system as a transgender man to bring changes to these systems. Mateo Llanillos is hopeful Oxenham's win will do that. When he transitioned about 15 years ago, Llanillos said he had to find out about health care through word of mouth.

"Yes, Logan is trans, but he also has an insight in terms of what health care looks like. Not just from a trans perspective, but as a person."

Llanillos said he hopes transgender people who are considering running for office will take note of Oxenham's achievement and know there is also a place for them at the table.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Court challenge to Manitoba's ban on homegrown, non-medical cannabis struck down by judge
A Manitoba judge has upheld the province's ban on homegrown non-medical cannabis, saying it is within its rights to impose the regulation.

The ruling is in a case brought before the courts in August 2020 by TobaGrown, a cannabis advocacy organization, which argued that the federal Cannabis Act doesn't give provinces and territories the permission to implement a ban, and that the existing regulation is overly punitive.

In her written decision, released last Friday, Manitoba Court of King's Bench Justice Shauna McCarthy rejected a claim that the ban was unconstitutional and an infringement on federal jurisdiction.

She ruled that the main purpose behind Manitoba's ban is to "support the provincial government scheme enacted to control and regulate the purchase, distribution, and sale of cannabis in a manner consistent with public interest."

TobaGrown's case looks specifically at Section 101.15 of the Liquor, Gaming and Cannabis Control Act, amended in October 2018 to include cannabis, which states that a person must not cultivate the drug at their residence.

Manitoba and Quebec are the only provinces to forbid the cultivation of cannabis at home. Home production of recreational cannabis results in a $2,542 fine in Manitoba.

The provincial legislation stands in contrast to Section 12 of the federal Cannabis Act, which states that up to four marijuana plants can be grown at a residence at one time.

Jesse Lavoie, founder of TobaGrown, says he knew the case would be an uphill battle after the Supreme Court of Canada upheld Quebec's ban on homegrown cannabis last April, finding that the federal law should not be interpreted as the right to "self-cultivation."

"So obviously we are disappointed. However, after reading the ruling, we do see that the judge is very sympathetic with our cause," Lavoie told CBC News on Monday.

He says there are plans to appeal the ruling, as "we feel [McCarthy] did make a legal error, and that is why we are pushing forward with this appeal."

At a hearing last March, lawyers for TobaGrown argued that the ban doesn't help the province regulate the distribution or sale of cannabis and is instead "a separate attempt to re-criminalize home cultivation."

They said the ban exceeds the bounds of provincial regulation and veers into criminal law.

The government's lawyers, however, argued the purpose of the ban was a means of ensuring that cannabis in Manitoba was distributed through licensed government sources and limiting access to youth.

On the issue of jurisdiction, they argued the ban falls into provincial powers outlined in the constitution, including property and civil rights.

In her Friday decision, McCarthy wrote that TobaGrown had not convinced her that the ban veers into criminal law "but rather was seen as a means of regulation and controlling access to cannabis in the interest of the public."

"I am not satisfied that the dominant purpose, or primary motivation behind the prohibition, was to suppress a social evil or condemn an activity to which the legislature generally disapproved."

Individuals who breach the Liquor, Gaming and Cannabis Control Act can face fines of up to $100,000 and/or up to year in prison.

McCarthy rejected Lavoie's argument that the current penalties are overly punitive, writing that although they are "very significant," they are not "so punitive as to demonstrate that the true purpose of the prohibition is to re-criminalize the activity of growing cannabis at home."

But the cannabis advocate has reason to be optimistic, as "the new government being the NDP — who previously promised to drop the ban — we're very hopeful that they will step in before we have to go back to court," said Lavoie.

Premier-designate Wab Kinew voiced opposition to the province's current rules in a 2019 Facebook post: "I don't smoke but if you do we'll let you have 4 plants and align the rules with the national law. So you'll be able to do homegrown," he wrote.

However, Lavoie says his fight in the courts will go on if the incoming provincial government walks back on previous pledges involving the ban.

"If need be, we will continue to go to court," he said. "We've been doing that for three-and-a-half years and have no problem doing it as long as it takes."
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
I'm surprised the rightwing lunatics running Alberta haven't tried to stop this! Yep, an independent Alberta with no way to export its oil and gas except through the USA and they had better hope republicans get elected there. By the time they get to sell any oil or gas, demand and prices will drop with the rise of EVs and renewables and if they don't export it for 10 years, I doubt they ever will. Add to that likely desertification with climate change and there goes the cattle industry and agriculture, forest fires will take care of tourism in the Rockies. A great time for Alberta to separate and go it alone, perfect timing, maybe they can join up with America and have all their problems too.

 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
He, that is my financial advisor!
I've heard of wearing your heart on your sleeve, but this guy wears his mind on his face, and it says a lot about him. He basically made himself unemployable or even sociable. We do need better mental health care though, and this fellow is an example of that, in his case mental health care would involve locking him up because there is no cure for that I figure.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
If they don't get a handle on low-cost housing and food prices, dunno how much difference it will make, but it is a step in the right direction. In 30 years, especially with the rise of AI, automation and humanoid robots that can do useful work, how many in society will be employed? When humanoid robots get good enough to work a fast-food restaurant or wait and bus tables, they will be able to do plenty of other jobs too including agriculture and construction work. We will need to figure out how to pay more people for doing nothing, if machines do all or most of the work and it looks like they will in 30 to 50 years.

 

printer

Well-Known Member
If they don't get a handle on low-cost housing and food prices, dunno how much difference it will make, but it is a step in the right direction. In 30 years, especially with the rise of AI, automation and humanoid robots that can do useful work, how many in society will be employed? When humanoid robots get good enough to work a fast-food restaurant or wait and bus tables, they will be able to do plenty of other jobs too including agriculture and construction work. We will need to figure out how to pay more people for doing nothing, if machines do all or most of the work and it looks like they will in 30 to 50 years.

"Correction - Oct. 18, 2023: This article was edited from a previous version that misspelled Dauphin, Manitoba. As well, the article was edtied to clarify that there is movement within the Senate, not federal government, as it studies the bill that would develop framework for implementaion of basic income."

It will not happen, a pipe dream. All it will do is cause more inflation.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
People won Nobel prizes in economics demonstrating that increases in technology lead to a higher standard of living. Why is everybody broke including governments while billionaires can afford their own fucking space programs? We need wealth redistribution, the real thing, not window dressing and should be living better than we were 50 years ago. 50 years ago, we never had homelessness issues yet had a rapidly growing population, but people were housed and could afford the housing, the groceries too.

 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
This is the end product of liberal democracy, the number and kinds of people who are empowered grows and some institutions are held to account for the sins of their forebearers. Technology drives social change and significant social change is happening within human lifespans which are also increasing or will, it also helps to drive social division in a multitude of ways.

 

Cannasaurus Rex

Well-Known Member
This is the end product of liberal democracy
A socialist mindset gets us to the lowest common denominator. To think any Canadian gov't has the plan or system to correct "wealth distribution" while keeping a thriving economy is Hugo Chavez (among others) dreaming. Governments do not generate cash, they take your neighbours cash. It's a cruel world and we have to stand up on own feet and stop empowering gov't to act as our keeper. "I want it now" enslaves our children and grandchildren to finance the whims of a whiney generation, who sell freedom for convenience. Can't wait for my grandkid to have to pay the upcoming (may take 25 years) class action lawsuit from intentionally limiting vaccine harm information from the public, while he continues to fund apology money to a growing list of 'wronged' citizens, who mostly died before he was born. Individual accountability is dying fast, and so is our society.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
A socialist mindset gets us to the lowest common denominator. To think any Canadian gov't has the plan or system to correct "wealth distribution" while keeping a thriving economy is Hugo Chavez (among others) dreaming. Governments do not generate cash, they take your neighbours cash. It's a cruel world and we have to stand up on own feet and stop empowering gov't to act as our keeper. "I want it now" enslaves our children and grandchildren to finance the whims of a whiney generation, who sell freedom for convenience. Can't wait for my grandkid to have to pay the upcoming (may take 25 years) class action lawsuit from intentionally limiting vaccine harm information from the public, while he continues to fund apology money to a growing list of 'wronged' citizens, who mostly died before he was born. Individual accountability is dying fast, and so is our society.
Look across the arc of western liberal democratic history and you will find a trend to include more kinds of people in the structures of power and law. 100 years ago, that included women who got the franchise and as time when by other groups were included too and with that came rights and new laws. We got a new constitution and bill of rights in the 80's that included native rights as Trudeau played off native territory rights against Quebec separatism. Before that Quebec had rights guaranteed by the crown to secure loyalty in the face of the American revolution and later Napoleonic wars. As I said, technology fosters social and political change and liberal democracy spreads rights out to all citizens. Society and social norms are changing faster than attitudes in many cases. Lots of people were probably excluded from the student union years ago starting with women, jews, natives, Indo Canadians, Asians and blacks, maybe even Catholics too.

It's before the courts, it hasn't been ruled on yet, I posted as an example of how society and attitudes change dramatically in 20 years, much less a human lifetime. I mean look how much Trump changed political and social norms in America in just a few years, he had a lot of help, but the change is evident.
 

Cannasaurus Rex

Well-Known Member
the change is evident
And the only thing that truly remains a constant. With a quickening society, change for the betterment of most (progress), takes a backseat to trending and quick buck consumerism. Small example of stupid change is prevalence of self-checkout systems and non-regulated short-term rental proliferation. Both are counter-productive to local economies and favour vanity, but proliferated anyway?
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
And the only thing that truly remains a constant. With a quickening society, change for the betterment of most (progress), takes a backseat to trending and quick buck consumerism. Small example of stupid change is prevalence of self-checkout systems and non-regulated short-term rental proliferation. Both are counter-productive to local economies and favour vanity, but proliferated anyway?
I was reading the self-checkout idea isn't working out too well for retailers. Money makes the world go round and everybody does most things in their own self-interest, or so they think. Technology tends to concentrate wealth and we see it from railways to the internet, one thing that appears to counteract that trend are new green technologies that should give people freedom from oil companies and in a lot better bargaining position with utilities. If you run your house on electric and it powers your car, then many people in North America can make their own electricity or offset their costs. It will mean energy independence or close to it for tens of millions in North America.

In order for anything to happen it has to make economic sense and the social, economic and government incentives have to align with policy. We are getting there with green energy and new batteries. Soon solar charged compact cars will be possible that can get 100km range for a day in the sun, new batteries can make it possible and above all feasible. Change will happen because it will make economic sense to most people and the pace of that change depends on the quality and price of the batteries that will power it.

We still have loads of problems with technology IMO and are finding out about some unpleasant side effects of being online all the time with computers and cellphones. The addictive nature of social media with the effects on youth being the most acute, us old farts largely grew up without it.
 
Top