Mar- A Lago raided FBI Warrants

rabbita78

Well-Known Member
And ones that promote inclusiveness.
yes - we have established that Whites are the race that has practiced tolerance, anti-racism, and inclusivity

and you all argue to REPLACE white people with non-Whites - who reject all of these things in their own countries

all because you saw a movie as a child about white people doing raysisms slaveries and conquests - and it saddened your feels lots... u havent emotionally evolved since. And since no movies have been made about non-Whites doing these same things.... it means they are blameless, helpless, and victims

and this is completely reasonable to you all

can you all at least understand why this DOESNT sound reasonable to the smart people?
 

printer

Well-Known Member
yes - we have established that Whites are the race that has practiced tolerance, anti-racism, and inclusivity

and you all argue to REPLACE white people with non-Whites - who don't believe in ANY of these things

all because you saw a movie as a child about white people doing raysisms slaveries and conquests - and it made u sad. And since no movies have been made about how non-Whites did these same things.... it means they are blameless, helpless, and victims

and this is completely reasonable to you all
When have we argued to replace whites? You are full of it.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Judge says he may unseal parts of Mar-a-Lago affidavit
A federal magistrate judge on Thursday said he may be willing to unseal portions of an affidavit used to apply for the search warrant on former President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, ordering Justice Department officials to suggest redactions to the document.
Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart said he believes the Justice Department has not sufficiently shown that the document should remain entirely secret.

“I find that on the present record the Government has not met its burden of showing that the entire affidavit should remain sealed,” Reinhart said in a brief order.

The judge issued his ruling during a hearing in West Palm Beach, Fla., where several news outlets had argued that the significant public interest in the filing justifies disclosing at least part of it.

According to The New York Times, Reinhart said there were parts of the affidavit that “could be presumptively unsealed,” and that it was not for him to decide whether “those portions would be meaningful for the public or the media.”
The affidavit, which was used to convince Reinhart that there was enough evidence to support the probable cause needed to obtain a search warrant, contains information about the federal law enforcement investigation into Trump’s handling of material marked classified following his departure from the White House.

Reinhart told the Justice Department to send him proposed redactions of the affidavit by next Thursday and said he would review whether they were appropriate.

“This is going to be a considered, careful process,” the judge said, according to the Times.

Charles Tobin, an attorney representing media outlets who have asked for the document’s release, said during Thursday’s hearing that the significant public interest in the matter weighs in favor of disclosing information about the search.

“Transparency serves the public interest in understanding and accepting the results. That’s good for the government and for the court,” Tobin said, according to The Washington Post. “You can’t trust what you cannot see.”

The department had argued that the affidavit should remain under seal in its entirety, saying the information it contained laid out a “roadmap” to its ongoing investigation.

“There remain compelling reasons, including to protect the integrity of an ongoing law enforcement investigation that implicates national security, that support keeping the affidavit sealed,” DOJ lawyers said in a court filing earlier this week.
well, seems to me that if this forces the DOJ's hand, they ought to just go ahead and arrest the criminal cocksuckers, get the show on the road...see how many days a week trump has to take off from campaigning to be in court? i'm guessing 5, all day, every day...and a conviction well before 2024
 

Budzbuddha

Well-Known Member
yes - we have established that Whites are the race that has practiced tolerance, anti-racism, and inclusivity

and you all argue to REPLACE white people with non-Whites - who reject all of these things in their own countries

all because you saw a movie as a child about white people doing raysisms slaveries and conquests - and it saddened your feels lots... u havent emotionally evolved since. And since no movies have been made about non-Whites doing these same things.... it means they are blameless, helpless, and victims

and this is completely reasonable to you all
Try the movie - Deliverance

Im sure you look up to Bobby Trippe ….
Now “ squeal like a pig “
 

Offmymeds

Well-Known Member
Judge says he may unseal parts of Mar-a-Lago affidavit
A federal magistrate judge on Thursday said he may be willing to unseal portions of an affidavit used to apply for the search warrant on former President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, ordering Justice Department officials to suggest redactions to the document.
Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart said he believes the Justice Department has not sufficiently shown that the document should remain entirely secret.

“I find that on the present record the Government has not met its burden of showing that the entire affidavit should remain sealed,” Reinhart said in a brief order.

The judge issued his ruling during a hearing in West Palm Beach, Fla., where several news outlets had argued that the significant public interest in the filing justifies disclosing at least part of it.

According to The New York Times, Reinhart said there were parts of the affidavit that “could be presumptively unsealed,” and that it was not for him to decide whether “those portions would be meaningful for the public or the media.”
The affidavit, which was used to convince Reinhart that there was enough evidence to support the probable cause needed to obtain a search warrant, contains information about the federal law enforcement investigation into Trump’s handling of material marked classified following his departure from the White House.

Reinhart told the Justice Department to send him proposed redactions of the affidavit by next Thursday and said he would review whether they were appropriate.

“This is going to be a considered, careful process,” the judge said, according to the Times.

Charles Tobin, an attorney representing media outlets who have asked for the document’s release, said during Thursday’s hearing that the significant public interest in the matter weighs in favor of disclosing information about the search.

“Transparency serves the public interest in understanding and accepting the results. That’s good for the government and for the court,” Tobin said, according to The Washington Post. “You can’t trust what you cannot see.”

The department had argued that the affidavit should remain under seal in its entirety, saying the information it contained laid out a “roadmap” to its ongoing investigation.

“There remain compelling reasons, including to protect the integrity of an ongoing law enforcement investigation that implicates national security, that support keeping the affidavit sealed,” DOJ lawyers said in a court filing earlier this week.
Interesting. A week to submit a redacted version. Maybe it will have clues such as "subject's son-in-law" assisted ...
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
yes - we have established that Whites are the race that has practiced tolerance, anti-racism, and inclusivity

and you all argue to REPLACE white people with non-Whites - who reject all of these things in their own countries

all because you saw a movie as a child about white people doing raysisms slaveries and conquests - and it saddened your feels lots... u havent emotionally evolved since. And since no movies have been made about non-Whites doing these same things.... it means they are blameless, helpless, and victims

and this is completely reasonable to you all

can you all at least understand why this DOESNT sound reasonable to the smart people?
why would the smart people talk to you? you haven't got clue fucking 1...
 

rabbita78

Well-Known Member
Can you all at least understand why all of the smart people disagree with you?

I mean all of your intellectual spokesmen have long abandoned your side

hell even CHOMSKY is clowning you politically correct fanatical clowns these days
your boy BILL MAHER has abandoned you - all u got left really is Michael Moore - and that's only cuz he feels you are easy prey if he gets hungry
 

doublejj

Well-Known Member
Can you all at least understand why all of the smart people disagree with you?

I mean all of your intellectual spokesmen have long abandoned your side

hell even CHOMSKY is clowning you politically correct fanatical clowns these days
your boy BILL MAHER has abandoned you - all u got left really is Michael Moore - and that's only cuz he feels you are easy prey if he gets hungry
Brandon won.....
1660853974505.png
 
Top